Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence and risk factors of nasal pressure ulcers related to nasogastric intubation: an observational study

  • original article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Pressure ulcers related to nasogastric tubes (NGT) are underestimated in clinical practice and rarely reported in the literature. Improper tube fixation around the nostril quickly induces tissue ischemia, possibly leading to skin ulcers and permanent full-thickness lesions. Epidemiological and clinical studies on this subject are lacking.

Methods

This was an observational, cross-sectional study performed in a tertiary-care hospital. Consecutive hospital records of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia, with an NGT inserted before or during surgery and maintained in place after the operation, were examined. Demographic and clinical data were extracted to investigate factors possibly associated with the occurrence of pressure ulcers of the nostril.

Results

Between 2011 and 2015, 2131 patients underwent elective surgical procedures. The overall prevalence of NGT-induced ulcers was 4.8%, with esophagectomy being the most common index operation. Univariate analysis did not show a statistically significant association between the presence of ulcers and the examined variables, with the exception of operative time (p < 0.012). The prevalence of nostril ulcers statistically differed across operative procedure time (p < 0.001), with a positive significant linear trend (p < 0.001), and lesions were significantly more frequent when the operative procedure lasted longer than 4 h (Confidence interval [CI] 9.2–17.1). Twenty-one (20.5%) patients required plastic surgery consultation due full-thickness lesions with severe cosmetic sequelae.

Conclusions

Nostril pressure ulcers related to NGT are common in clinical practice and necessitate a high index of suspicion and vigilance during the perioperative period. The only factor significantly associated with NGT-induced pressure ulcers was the length of the operative procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheadle WG, Vitale GC, Mackie CR, Cuschieri A. Prophylactic postoperative nasogastric decompression. A prospective study of its requirement and the influence of cimetidine in 200 patients. Ann Surg. 1985;202:361–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson R, Tse B, Edward S. Systematic review of prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal operations. Br J Surg. 2005;92:673–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanguy M, Seguin P, Mallédant Y. Bench-to-bedside review: routine postoperative use of the nasogastric tube – utility or futility? Crit Care. 2007;11:2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:189–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Black JM, Cuddigan JE, Walko MA, Didier LA, Lander MJ, Kelpe MR. Medical device related pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients. Int Wound J. 2010;7:358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Apold J, Rydrych D. Preventing device-related pressure ulcers: using data to guide statewide changes. J Nurs Care Qual. 2012;27:28–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Defloor T, Schoonhoven L. Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs. J Clin Nursing. 2004;13:952–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bass MJ, Phillips LG. Pressure sores. Curr Probl Surg. 2007;44:101–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mistry RC, Vijayabhaskar R, Karimundackal G, Jiwnani S, Pramesh CS. Effect of short-term vs prolonged nasogastric decompression on major postesophagectomy complications. Arch Surg. 2012;147:747–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsukamoto M, Fujiwara S, Nakamura Y, Yokoyama T. The risk factors of medical device related (MDR) pressure ulcers at the nostril in oral maxillofacial surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Standring S. et al. Gray’s Anatomy, 39th ed. Edinburgh, New York: Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Banerjee TS, Schneider HJ. Recommended method of attachment of nasogastric tubes. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:529–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Klinger M, Maione L, Villani F, Caviggioli F, Forcellini D, Klinger F. Reconstruction of a full-thickness alar wound using an auricular conchal composite graft. Can J Plast Surg. 2010;18:149–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Weijs TJ, Kumagai K, Berkelmans GHK, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Luyer MDP. Nasogastric decompression following esophagectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Dis Esoph. 2016; doi:10.1111/dote.12530.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Bonavina MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

E. Asti, A. Sironi, P. Milito, G. Bonavina, G. Bonitta and L. Bonavina declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asti, E., Sironi, A., Milito, P. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of nasal pressure ulcers related to nasogastric intubation: an observational study. Eur Surg 49, 171–174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-017-0476-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-017-0476-y

Keywords

Navigation