Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Attitudes and compliance to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist; a review

  • ICS congress 2015
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This review aimed to assess surgical safety checklist compliance (SSC) and evaluate surgical team attitudes, post checklist implementation.

Method

A thorough search of MEDLINE and PUBMED databases for English language studies using any adapted form of the WHO SSC was conducted. In total 26 studies; 13 assessing SSC compliance and 13 investigating surgical team attitudes of the checklist, were evaluated.

Results

Compliance studies demonstrated a checklist initiation rate of >90 %, but showed completion rates to be significantly lower across studies. ‘Sign out’ was the most poorly performed phase (<50 %) with ‘Time out’ being the best. Verification of patient identity and procedure demonstrated high (>90 %) compliance, while ‘Verification of team-members’ varied greatly. Surgical team attitudes noted improved teamwork, communication, patient safety and staff awareness of adverse events.

Conclusion

SSC compliance is highly dependent on staff perceptions, training and effective leadership. While, surgical teams have positive attitudes towards the SSC, resolving key barriers will improve compliance across all phases of SCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wangoo L, Robin R, Ho YH. Compliance and surgical team perceptions of WHO surgical safety checklist; systematic review. Int Surg. 2015:, In press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pickering SP, Robertson ER, Griffin D, Hadi M, Morgan LJ, Catchpole KC, et al. Compliance and use of the World Health Organization checklist in U.K. operating theatres. Br J Surg. 2013;100(12):1664–1670.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Urbach DR, Govindarajan A, Saskin R, Wilton AS, Baxter NN. Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(11):1029–1038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomassen O, Storesund A, Softeland E, Brattebo G. The effects of safety checklists in medicine: A systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(1):5–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Russ S, Rout S, Sevdalis N, Moorthy K, Darzi A, Vincent C. Do safety checklists improve teamwork and communication in the operating room? A systematic review. Ann Surg. 2013;258(6):856–871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laltaksh Wangoo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

L. Wangoo, R.A. Ray and Y.-H. Ho state that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

The supplement is dedicated to Jubilee World congress of International College of Surgeons 2015.

The publishing was sponsored by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wangoo, L., Ray, R.A. & Ho, YH. Attitudes and compliance to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist; a review. Eur Surg 48 (Suppl 2), 155–162 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-016-0405-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-016-0405-5

Keywords

Navigation