Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Case numbers in carotid surgery training can be accomplished and are not associated with an inferior outcome. Results of a university based tertiary care center study

  • Main Topic
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is regarded as a standard procedure in vascular surgery (VS), but training in CEA is often withheld, because an inferior outcome is feared. Yet, VS training guidelines require minimum caseload experience as the primary operator and/or first assistant for training recognition.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of the vascular database of a university based tertiary care center. Training procedures were defined as procedures performed by a trainee vascular surgeon under supervision of a vascular surgeon; teaching procedures as procedures performed by a vascular surgeon assisted by a trainee. All other procedures were routine.

Results

From February 2002 to April 2011 nine VS trainees performed 816 CEAs either as primary surgeon (n = 353, 43 %) or as first assistant (n = 463, 57 %). A total of 244 months of VS training was evaluated. The average number of CEAs was 1.8 as primary operator and 3.9 as first assistant per month. There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative stroke and death between patients undergoing CEA performed by VS trainees or by senior surgeons.

Conclusions

A VS trainee can expect to perform an average of 50 or more CEAs as primary operator and 80 or more CEAs as first assistant during a training period of 36 months. This exceeds the numbers required by the Austrian Medical Council and the European Vascular Board. There was neither an inferior overall outcome nor a higher complication rate between patients undergoing CEA performed by trainees as primary operator or as first assistant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lutz HJ, Michael R, Gahl B, Savolainen H. Is carotid endarterectomy a trainee operation? World J Surg. 2009;33:242–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sandermann J, Panduro Jensen L. The Danish specialist training in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23:353–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pai M, Handa A, Hands L. Adequate vascular training opportunities can be provided without compromising patient care. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23:524–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradbury AW, Brittenden J, Murie JA, Jenkins AM, Ruckley CV. Supervised training in carotid endarterectomy is safe. Br. J. Surg. 1997;84:1708–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone ME, Kunjummen BJ, Moran JC, Wilkerson DK, Zatina MA. Supervised training of general surgery residents in carotid endarterectomy performed on awake patients under regional block is safe and desirable. Am Surg. 2000;66:781–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Naylor AR, Thompson MM, Varty K, Sayers RD, London NJ, Bell PR. Provision of training in carotid surgery does not compromise patient safety. Br J Surg. 1998;85:939–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, EVA-3S Investigators. Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) Trial. Stroke. 2004;35:18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lamont PM, Scott DJ. The impact of shortened training times on the discipline of vascular surgery in the United Kingdom. Am J Surg. 2005;190:269–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaafarani HM, Itani KM, Petersen LA, Thornby J, Berger DH. Does resident hour reduction have an impact on surgical outcomes? J Surg Res. 2005;126:167–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beard JD, Choksy S, Khan S. Assessment of operative competence during carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg. 2007;94:726–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Austrian Society for Vascular Surgery. Available http://www.vascsurg.at/oeggweb/ausbildungsordnung.html. Accessed:

  12. Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D, et al. ESVS Guidelines. invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(4 Suppl):1–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, et al. ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Neuro-Interventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:e16–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Archie JP. Prospective randomised trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch reconstruction: the problem is power. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:1118–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reigner B, Reveilleau P, Gayral M, Papon X, Enon B, Chevalier JM. Eversion endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery: midterm results of a new technique. Ann Vasc Surg. 1995;9:141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rijbroek A, Wisselink W, Rauwerda JA. The impact of training in unselected patients on mortality and morbidity in carotid endarterectomy in a vascular training center and the recommendations of the European Board of Surgery Qualification in Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;26:256–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gelabert HA, Moore WS. Carotid endarterectomy: current status. Curr Prob Surg. 1991;28:181–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sajid MS, Vijaynagar B, Singh P, Hamilton C. Literature review of cranial nerve injuries during carotid endarterectomy. Acta Chir Belg. 2007;107:25–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schauber MD, Fontenelle LJ, Solomon JW, Hanson TL. Cranial cervical nerve dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:481–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah DM, Darling III RC, Chang BB, et al. Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique. Its safety and durability. Ann Sur. 1998;228:471–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Assadian A, Senekowitsch C, Pfaffelmeyer N, Assadian O, Ptakovsky H, Hagmüller GW. Incidence of cranial nerve injury after carotid eversion endarterectomy with a transverse skin incision under regional anaesthesia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28:421–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, Austria

    P. Metzger MD, M. Aspalter MD, S. Guggenbichler MD, W. Dabernig MD, K. Linni MD, E. Butturini MD & T. Hölzenbein MD

Authors
  1. P. Metzger MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Aspalter MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Guggenbichler MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W. Dabernig MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Linni MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E. Butturini MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. T. Hölzenbein MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Linni MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Metzger, P., Aspalter, M., Guggenbichler, S. et al. Case numbers in carotid surgery training can be accomplished and are not associated with an inferior outcome. Results of a university based tertiary care center study. Eur Surg 46, 239–243 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-014-0274-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-014-0274-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation