Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

APACHE II and Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) fail to predict lethality in septic peritonitis in immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

We investigated the applicability of both Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) in transplant recipients with intestinal perforation as polymicrobial peritonitis is highly life-threatening in patients with impaired immunological defence and the course of abdominal sepsis is aberrant compared to non-immunosuppressed individuals.

Methods

In a retrospective database analysis, we validated the consistency of APACHE II and MPI in death prediction in septic peritonitis. In a matched-pair analysis we then investigated their applicability in immunosuppressed transplant recipients. The validation of the scores was performed with 125 non-immunosuppressed patients. In a matched-pair analysis 16 immunosuppressed transplant recipients were compared with 32 controls.

Results

In accordance with clinical observations, statistical analyses revealed significantly higher MPI scores in immunosuppressed transplant recipients (P = 0.0007), whereas APACHE II scores were comparable. Linear regression analysis revealed that predicted death rates derived from APACHE II and MPI differ significantly (P = 0.0344) in immunosuppressed transplant recipients compared to controls.

Conclusions

Both scores consistently serve as reliable tools for prediction of lethality in septic peritonitis but they fail in immunosuppressed organ recipients. Our findings clearly confirm that in immunosuppressed patients severe peritonitis might be present despite an a- or oligosymptomatic clinical course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Till JW, van Veen SQ, van Ruler O, et al. The innate immune response to secondary peritonitis. Shock. 2007;28(5):504–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hensler T, Hecker H, Heeg K, et al. Distinct mechanisms of immunosuppression as a consequence of major surgery. Infect Immun. 1997;65(6):2283–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeitoun G, Laurent A, Rouffet F, et al. Multicentre, randomized clinical trial of primary versus secondary sigmoid resection in generalized peritonitis complicating sigmoid diverticulitis. Br J Surg. 2000;87(10):1366–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Novotny A, Emmanuel K, Matevossian E, et al. Use of procalcitonin for early prediction of lethal outcome of postoperative sepsis. Am J Surg. 2007;194(1):35–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991;100:1619–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U, et al. The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intra-operative prognosis of peritonitis. Chirurg. 1987;58(2):84–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Demmel N, Muth G, Maag K, et al. Prognostic scores in peritonitis: the Mannheim Peritonitis Index or APACHE II? Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379(6):347–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Komatsu S, Shimomatsuya T, Nakajima M, et al. Prognostic factors and scoring system for survival in colonic perforation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52(63):761–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bosscha K, Reijnders K, Hulstaert PF, et al. Prognostic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intra-abdominal sepsis. Br J Surg. 1997;84(11):1532–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Demmel N, Maag K, Osterholzer G. Probability of clinical prognostic factors in peritonitis – evaluation of the Mannheim Peritonitis-Index. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379:152–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rix TE, Bates T. Pre-operative risk scores for the prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg. 2007;2:16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogy M, Függer R, Schemper M, et al. The value of 2 distinct prognosis scores in patients with peritonitis. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index versus the Apache II score. Chirurg. 1990;61(4):297–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Michalak G, Kwiatkowski A, Czerwinski J, et al. Surgical complications of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a 16-year-experience at one centre. Transpl Proc. 2005;37(8):3555–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Michalak G, Kwiatkowski A, Bieniasz M, et al. Infectious complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Transpl Proc. 2005;37(8):3560–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sansalone CV, Maione G, Aseni P, et al. Surgical complications are the main cause of pancreatic allograft loss in pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Proc. 2005;37(6):2651–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. SFAR—Société Française d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation. APACHE II and predicted mortality. http://www.sfar.org/scores2/apache22.html [accessed Oct.–Dec. 2012].

  18. Függer R, Rogy M, Herbst F, et al. Validation study of the Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Chirurg. 1988;59(9):598–601.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Billing A, Fröhlich D, Schildberg FW. Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. Peritonitis Study Group. Br J Surg. 1994;81(2):209–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nomura T, Tasaki Y, Hirata Y, et al. Intestinal perforation after cadaveric renal transplantation. Int J Urol. 2004;11(9):774–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peng T, Peng MH, Li LQ, et al. Perforation after combined liver-kidney transplantation for a case of congenital polycystic disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10(18):2769–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abderrahim E, Bouhamed L, Raies L, et al. Intestinal perforation following renal transplantation: report of 2 cases related to cytomegalovirus disease. Transpl Proc. 2003;35(7):2706–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Andreoni KA, Pelletier RP, Elkhammas EA, et al. Increased incidence of gastrointestinal surgical complications in renal transplant recipients with polycystic kidney disease. Transplantation. 1999;67(2):262–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stelzner M, Vlahakos DV, Milford EL, et al. Colonic perforations after renal transplantation. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184(1):63–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bardaxoglou E, Maddern G, Ruso L, et al. Gastrointestinal surgical emergencies following kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 1993;6(3):148–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bone RC, Sibbald WJ, Sprung CL. The ACCP-SCCM consensus conference on sepsis and organ failure. Chest. 1992;101(6):1481–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Assfalg V, Hüser N, Reim D, et al. Combined immunosuppressive and antibiotic therapy improves bacterial clearance and survival of polymicrobial septic peritonitis. Shock. 2010;33(2):155–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Grunau G, Heemken R, Hau T. Predictors of outcome in patients with postoperative intra-abdominal infection. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(8):619–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gea-Banacloche JC, Opal SM, Jorgensen J, et al. Sepsis associated with immunosuppressive medications: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:S578–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Soubrane O, el Meteini M, Devictor D, et al. Risk and prognostic factors of gut perforation after orthotopic liver transplantation for biliary atresia. Liver Transpl Surg. 1995;1(1):2–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee YJ, Park CH, Yun JW, et al. Predictive comparisons of procalcitonin (PCT) level, arterial ketone body ratio (AKBR), APACHE III score and multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Yonsei Med J. 2004;29(1):29–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors (Volker Assfalg, Daniel Reim, Edouard Matevossian, Bernhard Holzmann, Klaus Emmanuel, Alexander Novotny, and Norbert Hüser) declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Assfalg MD.

Additional information

A. N. and N.H. contributed equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Assfalg, V., Reim, D., Matevossian, E. et al. APACHE II and Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) fail to predict lethality in septic peritonitis in immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients. Eur Surg 45, 205–212 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-013-0218-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-013-0218-8

Keywords

Navigation