Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effects of Intraperitoneal Sildenafil Administration on Healing of Left Colonic Anastomoses and Intra-Abdominal Adhesion Formation in the Presence of Intra-Abdominal Infection

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this pilot study was to establish an animal model for intra-abdominal infection and to examine the effect of sildenafil on anastomotic healing of the left colon and intra-abdominal adhesion formation.

Methods

Fourteen Winstar rats underwent colonic transsection and primary anastomosis after performing intra-abdominal infection. Rats were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 7): intra-abdominal infection, resection, and anastomoses; Group 2 (n = 7): intra-abdominal infection, resection, anastomoses, and sildenafil. Anastomotic bursting pressures, hydroxyproline levels, histopathologic grading, and abdominal adhesions were accessed on the postoperative Day 7.

Results

Anastomotic healing was found to be improved in terms of a bursting pressure (P = 0.02). Histopathological examination revealed an increase in angiogenesis (P = 0.007). Moreover, intra-abdominal adhesions were significantly less in rats given sildenafil (P = 0.03).

Conclusion

Sildenafil may improve anastomotic healing of the left colon and diminishes peritoneal adhesion formation in the presense of abdominal infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batukan C, Ozgun MT, Basbug M, Muderris II. Sildenafil reduces postoperative adhesion formation in a rat uterine horn model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;135:183–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reijnen MM, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor H. Pathophysiology of intra-abdominal adhesion and abscess formation, and the effect of hyaluronan. Br J Surg 2003;90:533–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ecthenacher B, Mannel DN, Hultner L. Critical protective role of mast cells in a model of acute septic peritonitis. Nature 1996;331:75–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malaviya R, Ikeda T, Ross E, Abraham SN. Mast cell modulation of neutrophil influx and bacterial clearance at sites of infection through TNF-alfa. Nature 1996;381:77–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cahill RA, Wang J, Sookhai S, Redmond HP. Mast cells facilitate local VEGF release as an early event in the pathogenesis of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Surgery 2006;140:108–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liebman SM, Langer JC, Marshall JS, Collins SM. Role of mast cells in adhesion formation. Am J Surg 1993;165:127–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Regenet N, Pessaux P, Hennekinne S, et al. Primary anastomoses after intraoprrative colonic lavagen vs. Hartmann’s procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003;18:503–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zorcolo L, Covotta L, Carlomagno N, Bartolo DC. Safety of primary anastomosis in emergency colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:262–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaleli B, Ozden A, Aybek Z, Bostanci B. The effect of L-arginine and pentoxifyllin on postoperative adhesion formation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77:377–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozden A, Bostanci B, Sarioglu A, Taskiran D, Tetik C. Effect of nitric oxide on postoperative adhesion formation. Eur Surg Res 1999;31:465–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarifakioglu N, Gokrem S, Ates L, Akbuga UB, Aslan G. The influence of sildenafil on random skin flap survival in rats: an experimental study. Br J Plast Surg 2004;57:769–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonsson K, Jensen JA, Goodson WH, et al. Tissue oxygenation, anemia, and perfusion in relation to wound healing in surgical patients. Ann Surg 1991;214:605–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Swaim SF, Vaughn DM, Kincaid SA. Effect of locally injected medications on the healing of pad wounds in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1996;57:394–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brasken P. Healing of experimental colon anastomoses. Eur J Surg Suppl 1991;566:1–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McCullough AR. An update on the PDE-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i). J Androl 2003;24:52–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hulka JF, Omran K, Berger GS. Classification of adnexal adhesions: a proposal and evaluation of its prognostic value. Fertil Steril 1978;41:661–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Woessner JF. The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this imino acid. Arch Biochem Biophys 1961;93:440–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ehrlich HP, Tarver H, Hunt TK. Effects of vitamin A and glucocorticoids upon inflammation and collagen synthesis. Ann Surg 1973;177:222–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cahil RA, Wang JH, Redmond HP. Enteric bacteria and their antigens may stimulate postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation. Surgery 2007;141:403–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vipond MN, Whawell SA, Thomson JN, Dudley HA. Effect of experimental peritonitis and ischemia on peritoneal fibrinolitic activity. Eur J Surg 1994;160:471–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dorr PJ, Vemer HM, Brommer EJ, Willemsen WM, Veldhuizen RW, Rolland R. Prevention of postoperative adhesions by tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) in the rabbit. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1990;37:287–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Biondo S, Jaurrieta E, Marti Rague J, DeOca J, Moreno P, Farran L. Role of resection and primary anastomosis of the left colon in the presense of peritonitis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1580–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Runkel NS, Hinz U, Lehnert T, Buhr HJ, Herforth CH. Improved outcome after emergency surgery for cancer of the large intestine. Br J Surg 1998;85:1260–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hart K, Baur D, Hodam J, et al. Short- and long-term effects of sildenafil on skin flap survival in rats. Laringoscope 2006;116:522–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Irkorucu O, Tascılar O, Cakmak GK, et al. The effect of sildenafil on an animal model for ischemic colitis. Dig Dis Sci 2008;53:1618–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Boland GM, Weigel RJ. Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res 2006;132:3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Barnes CD, Eltherington LG. Drug dosage in laboratory animals: A handbook. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kologlu M, Yorganci K, Renda N, Sayek I. Effect of local and remote ischemia reperfusion injury on healing of colonic anastomoses. Surgery 2000;128:99–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thornton FJ, Barbul A. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:549–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Aytekin FO, Teke Z, Aydin C, et al. Effects of a membrane-permeable radical scavenger, Tempol, on healing of colonic anastomoses in the cecal ligation and pucture model of polymicrobial sepsis in rats. Am Surg 2007;193:723–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Colak T, Nayci A, Polat G, et al. Effects of trapidil on the healing of colonic anastomoses in an experimental rat model. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:916–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Refik Ayten M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Ayten, R., Çetinkaya, Z., Girgin, M. et al. The Effects of Intraperitoneal Sildenafil Administration on Healing of Left Colonic Anastomoses and Intra-Abdominal Adhesion Formation in the Presence of Intra-Abdominal Infection. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1837–1841 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9398-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9398-x

Key words

Navigation