Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Successful Physical Therapy for Constipation Related to Puborectalis Dyssynergia Improves Symptom Severity and Quality of Life

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated symptom severity and quality of life in patients with puborectalis dyssynergia before and after physical therapy.

Methods

Twenty-two patients with puborectalis dyssynergia were prospectively enrolled into a multidisciplinary program for the treatment of pelvic floor and bowel disorders in this case series. All patients had functional constipation and evidence of puborectalis dyssynergia. Physical therapy and behavioral counseling were offered to all. Patients completed the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Patient-Assessment of Constipation Symptom Questionnaire, and the Patient-Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Results

Sixteen patients successfully completed the program. Symptom severity decreased after physical therapy (2.1 ± 0.7 vs. 1.3 ± 0.9, P = 0.007). Quality of life also improved significantly (2.6 ± 0.8 vs. 1.5 ± 1.0, P = 0.007). Patients reported less physical discomfort, fewer worries/concerns, and indicated satisfaction with treatment. The difference in symptom severity was highly correlated with improvement in quality of life (r = 0.7, P = .005).

Conclusions

Successful physical therapy for patients with puborectalis dyssynergia is associated with improvements in constipation-related symptoms and in quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Physician visits in the United States for constipation: 1958 to 1986. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:606–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wald A, Scarpignato C, Kamm MA, et al. The burden of constipation on quality of life: results of a multinational survey. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26:227–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Irvine EJ, Ferrazzi S, Pare P, Thompson WG, Rance L. Health-related quality of life in functional GI disorders: focus on constipation and resource utilization. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1986–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lembo A, Camilleri M. Chronic constipation. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1360–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nyam DC, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup DM, Rath DM. Long-term results of surgery for chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:273–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Karlbom U, Edebol Eeg-Olofsson K, Graf W, Nilsson S, Pahlman L. Paradoxical puborectalis contraction is associated with impaired rectal evacuation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1998;13:141–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dailianas A, Skandalis N, Rimikis MN, Koutsomanis D, Kardasi M, Archimandritis A. Pelvic floor study in patients with obstructive defecation: influence of biofeedback. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000;30:176–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Heymen S, Jones KR, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Biofeedback treatment of constipation: a critical review. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1208–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A, et al. Pelvic floor dyssynergia and bimodal rehabilitation: results of combined pelviperineal kinesitherapy and biofeedback training. Int J Colorectal Dis 1998;13:124–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A, Wexner SD. Biofeedback therapy in the colon and rectal practice. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2003;28:47–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Palsson OS, Heymen S, Whitehead WE. Biofeedback treatment for functional anorectal disorders: a comprehensive efficacy review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2004;29:153–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ko CY, Tong J, Lehman RE, Shelton AA, Schrock TR, Welton ML. Biofeedback is effective therapy for fecal incontinence and constipation. Arch Surg 1997;132:829–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Larach SW, et al. Electromyographic assessment of biofeedback training for fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:907–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitehead WE, Wald A, Diamant NE, Enck P, Pemberton JH, Rao SS. Functional disorders of the anus and rectum. Gut 1999;45(Suppl 2)II55–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frank L, Kleinman L, Farup C, Taylor L, Miner P Jr. Psychometric validation of a constipation symptom assessment questionnaire. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34:870–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marquis P, De La Loge C, Dubois D, McDermott A, Chassany O. Development and validation of the patient assessment of constipation quality of life questionnaire. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005;40:540–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient health questionnaire. JAMA 1999;282:1737–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wexner SD, Cheape JD, Jorge JM, Heymen S, Jagelman DG. Prospective assessment of biofeedback for the treatment of paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:145–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Battaglia E, Serra AM, Buonafede G, et al. Long-term study on the effects of visual biofeedback and muscle training as a therapeutic modality in pelvic floor dyssynergia and slow-transit constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:90–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chiotakakou-Faliakou E, Kamm MA, Roy AJ, Storrie JB, Turner IC. Biofeedback provides long-term benefit for patients with intractable, slow and normal transit constipation. Gut 1998;42:517–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiesel PH, Dorta G, Cuypers P, et al. Patient satisfaction after biofeedback for constipation and pelvic floor dyssynergia. Swiss Med Wkly 2001;131:152–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Jones K, Ringel Y, Drossman D, Whitehead WE. Randomized, controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to alternative treatments for patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia-type constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:428–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez-Puente MC, Pascual-Montero JA, Garcia-Olmo D. Customized biofeedback therapy improves results in fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;19:210–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lau CW, Heymen S, Alabaz O, Iroatulam AJ, Wexner SD. Prognostic significance of rectocele, intussusception, and abnormal perineal descent in biofeedback treatment for constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:478–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Anne McLeod, R.N., B.S.N., and Raylene Marcum, R.N. of the Michigan Bowel Control Program, and the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of Michigan Hospital for their participation and support of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Lewicky-Gaupp M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Lewicky-Gaupp, C., Morgan, D.M., Chey, W.D. et al. Successful Physical Therapy for Constipation Related to Puborectalis Dyssynergia Improves Symptom Severity and Quality of Life. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1686–1691 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9392-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9392-3

Key words

Navigation