Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative and Postoperative Quality of Life in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to prospectively examine functional outcome, quality of life, and patients’ personal experiences and adjustment to functional changes during the first year after prophylactic surgery.

Methods

Twenty-one consecutive patients with familial adenomatous polyposis were examined before proctocolectomy (T0), on ileostomy reversal (T1), and 6 (T2) and 12 months (T3) after surgery by means of standardized questionnaires and interviews.

Results

Average physical and mental health declined profoundly after proctocolectomy, followed by a steady improvement after 6 and 12 months. The majority of patients reported the ileostomy period as particularly distressing. After one year, 75 percent of patients reported complete recovery in terms of physical, emotional, and social functioning, whereas one-quarter of patients did not regain their former level of functioning. Despite substantial improvement in pouch functions, functional impairment persists because of frequent bowel movements, resulting mainly in restricted social activities. Ten percent of patients reported impaired sex life, irrespective of gender.

Conclusions

The majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis were found to adjust favorably to functional impairment while maintaining satisfactory quality of life. Complementing standardized quality of life measures by patients’ personal experiences may help to identify vulnerable patients in need of psychosocial support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ambrose WL Jr, Dozois RR, Pemberton JH, Beart RW Jr, Ilstrup DM. Familial adenomatous polyposis: results following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:12–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Fazio VW, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 2006;93:407–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Duijvendijk P, Slors JF, Taat CW, Oosterveld P, Vasen HF. Functional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 1999;230:648–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Remzi FH, Church JM, Bast J, et al. Mucosectomy vs. stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: functional outcome and neoplasia control. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1590–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, McGannon E, Fazio VW. Surgery for the teenager with familial adenomatous polyposis: ileo-rectal anastomosis or restorative proctocolectomy? Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:6–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tonelli F, Valanzano R, Monaci I, Mazzoni P, Garcea A, Monaci I. Restorative proctocolectomy or rectum-preserving surgery in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: results of a prospective study. World J Surg 1997;21:653–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hassan I, Chua HK, Wolff BG, et al. Quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2032–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kadmon M. Preventive surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis coli. Chirurg 2005;76:1125–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heuschen U, Schmidt J, Allemeyer E, Stern J, Heuschen G. The ileo-anal pouch procedure: complications, quality of life, and long-term results. Zentralbl Chir 2001;126(Suppl):36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Robb B, Pritts T, Gang G, et al. Quality of life in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at the University of Cincinnati. Am J Surg 2002;183:353–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fazio VW, O'Riordain MG, Lavery IC, et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg 1999;230:575–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Duijvendijk P, Slors JF, Taat CW, et al. Quality of life after total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 2000;87:590–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Esplen MJ, Berk T, Butler K, Gallinger S, Cohen Z, Trinkhaus M. Quality of life in adults diagnosed with familial adenomatous polyposis and desmoid tumor. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:687–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heuschen UA, Heuschen G, Lucas M, Hinz U, Stern J, Herfarth C. Pre- and postoperative quality of life of patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis with ileoanal pouch operation. Chirurg 1998;69:1329–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ware JE Jr. The SF-36 Health Survey. In: Spilker B. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:337–46.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bullinger M. German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1359–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Hulten L. The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:50–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheier MF, Carver CS. Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol 1985;4:219–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scholler G, Fliege H, Klapp BF. Questionnaire of self-efficacy, optimism and pessimism: reconstruction, selection of items and validation of an instrument by means of examinations of clinical samples. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 1999;49:275–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fydrich T, Sommer G, Menzel G, Höll B. Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (Social Support Questionnaire, Shortform, SOZU-K22). Z Klin Psychol 1984;16:434–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Notter J, Burnard P. Preparing for loop ileostomy surgery: women's accounts from a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud 2006;43:147–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Buddeberg C. Career promotion in psychosomatic medicine. Z Psychosom Med Psychother 2002;48:313–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, Lucas M, Heuschen G, Herfarth C. One- or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 2001;234:788–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Osterfeld M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Osterfeld, N., Kadmon, M., Brechtel, A. et al. Preoperative and Postoperative Quality of Life in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1324–1330 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9383-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9383-4

Key words

Navigation