Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 348–354 | Cite as

Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection in Solitary Rectal Ulcer Associated with Prolapse of the Rectum: A Prospective Study

  • Paolo Boccasanta
  • Marco Venturi
  • Giuseppe Calabro
  • Marco Maciocco
  • Gian Carlo Roviaro
Original Contribution

Abstract

Purpose

At present, none of the conventional surgical treatments of solitary rectal ulcer associated with internal rectal prolapse seems to be satisfactory because of the high incidence of recurrence. The stapled transanal rectal resection has been demonstrated to successfully cure patients with internal rectal prolapse associated with rectocele, or prolapsed hemorrhoids. This prospective study was designed to evaluate the short-term and long-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection in patients affected by solitary rectal ulcer associated with internal rectal prolapse and nonresponders to biofeedback therapy.

Methods

Fourteen patients were selected on the basis of validated constipation and continence scorings, clinical examination, anorectal manometry, defecography, and colonoscopy and were submitted to biofeedback therapy. Ten nonresponders were operated on and followed up with incidence of failure, defined as no improvement of symptoms and/or recurrence of rectal ulceration, as the primary outcome measure. Operative time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, time to return to normal activity, overall patient satisfaction index, and presence of residual rectal prolapse also were evaluated.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 27.2 (range, 24–34) months, symptoms significantly improved, with 80 percent of excellent/good results and none of the ten operated patients showed a recurrence of rectal ulcer. Operative time, hospital stay, and time to return to normal activity were similar to those reported after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation, whereas postoperative pain was slightly higher. One patient complained of perineal abscess, requiring surgery.

Discussion

The stapled transanal rectal resection is safe and effective in the cure of solitary rectal ulcer associated with internal rectal prolapse, with minimal complications and no recurrences after two years. Randomized trials with sufficient number of patients are necessary to compare the efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection with the traditional surgical treatments of this rare condition.

Key words

Solitary rectal ulcer Internal rectal prolapse Stapled transanal rectal resection 

References

  1. 1.
    Meurette G, Regenet N, Frampas E, Sagan C, Le Borgne J, Lehur PA. The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2006;30:382–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nincheri Kunz M, Renzi F, Kroning KC, et al. The solitary rectal ulcer today. A review of the literature. Min Chir 1998;53:919–34.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaizey CJ, van den Bogaerde JB, Emmanuel AV, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 1998;85:1617–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keighley MR, Shouler P. Clinical and manometric features of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:507–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salzano A, Grassi R, Habib I, et al. The defecographic and clinical aspects of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Radiol Med 1988;95:588–92.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marchal F, Bresler L, Brunaud L, et al. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a series of 13 patients operated with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001;16:228–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choi HJ, Shin EJ, Hwang YH, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Clinical presentation and surgical outcome in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Surg Innov 2005;12:307–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Salamina G, Cesana BM, Bernasconi F, Roviaro G. New trends in the surgical treatment of outlet obstruction: clinical and functional results of two novel transanal stapled techniques from a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;19:359–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G. Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:245–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeiffer J, Reisman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:681–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oliviera J, Pfeiffer J, Wexner SD. Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 1996;83:502–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Basilisco G, Velio P, Bianchi PA. Oesophageal manometry in the evaluation of megacolon with onset in adult life. Gut 1997;40:188–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography: II. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9:253–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dvorkin LS, Gladman MA, Epstein J, Scott SM, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ. Rectal intussusception in symptomatic patients is different from that in asymptomatic volunteers. Br J Surg 2005;92:866–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vaizey CJ, Roy AJ, Kamm MA. Prospective evaluation of the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with biofeedback. Gut 1997;41:817–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rao SS, Ozturk R, De Ocampo S, Stessman M. Pathophysiology and role of the biofeedback therapy in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:613–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choi JS, Hwang YH, Salum MR, Pikarsky AS, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Outcome and management of patients with large rectoanal intussusception. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:740–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van den Brandt-Gradel V, Huibregtse K, Tytgat GN. Treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with high-fiber diet and abstention of straining of defecation. Dig Dis Sci 1984;29:1005–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simsek A, Yagci G, Gorgolu S, Zeybek N, Kaymakcioglu N, Sen D. Diagnostic features and treatment modalities in solitary rectal ulcer. Acta Chir Belg 2004;104:92–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dieng M, Sanon DA, Ka O, Konate I, Dia A, Toure CT. Solitary ulcer of the rectum. Report of two cases treated by the Orr-Loygue technique. Dakar Med 2004;49:32–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morio O, Meurette G, Desforneaux V, D’Halluin PN, Bretagne JF, Siproudhis L. Anorectal physiology in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a case-matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1917–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Boccasanta
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marco Venturi
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Calabro
    • 1
  • Marco Maciocco
    • 1
  • Gian Carlo Roviaro
    • 1
  1. 1.1st Department of General SurgeryOspedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy, and the University of MilanMilanItaly
  2. 2.MilanItaly

Personalised recommendations