Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vascular Invasion is Underrecognized in Colorectal Cancer Using Conventional Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that highlighting vascular spaces with histochemical or immunohistochemical stains facilitates the identification of extramural and intramural vascular invasion in resected colorectal cancer specimens compared with routine hematoxylin and eosin staining.

Methods

Archival tumor sections from 50 resected colorectal cancers, in which extramural vascular invasion was not seen within the original tissue sections, were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, elastic van gieson histochemistry, and immunohistochemistry for CD31 and CD34. Two observers assessed the stained sections and the agreed incidence of vascular invasion using the four staining methods was compared.

Results

Vascular invasion was more commonly identified in Dukes C (pTanyN1/2) (vascular invasion seen in 24 of 25 cases by at least 1 method) than Dukes B tumors (pT3/4N0) (vascular invasion seen in 14 of 25 cases by at least 1 method). Vascular invasion was identified in significantly more cases using elastic van gieson (24 cases; P--.0001), CD31 (18 cases; P--.0064), and CD34 (21 cases; P-lt;-.0001) than with hematoxylin and eosin alone (5 cases).

Conclusions

This study was novel in that it compared both histochemical and immunohistochemical methods for identifying vascular invasion in cases of colorectal cancer in which vascular invasion had not been identified during initial reporting. Highlighting of endothelium significantly increases the observed incidence of vascular invasion in colorectal cancer compared with hematoxylin and eosin alone. Elastic van gieson seemed sensitive for the presence of vascular invasion but with uncertain specificity. The possibility that these immunohistochemical methods may identify a subset of patients with colorectal cancer who may benefit from chemotherapy warrants further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dataset for colorectal cancer histopathology reports. 1998b The Royal College of Pathologists. Available at: http://www.rcpath.org/index.asp?PageID=1153., Accessed on March 15, 2006

  2. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch, eds. UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumours. 5th ed. New York: Wiley, 1997.

  3. Petersen VC, Baxter KJ, Love SB, Shepherd NA. Identification of objective pathological prognostic determinants and models of prognosis in Dukes B colon cancer. Gut 2002;51:65–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Willett CG, Badizadegan K, Ancukiewicz M, Shellito PC. Prognostic factors in stage T3N0 rectal cancer: do all patients require postoperative pelvic irradiation and chemotherapy? Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:167-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vass DG, Ainsworth R, Anderson JH, Murray D, Foulis AK. The value of an elastic tissue stain in detecting venous invasion in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:769-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sternberg A, Mizrahi A, Amar M, Groisman G. Detection of venous invasion in surgical specimens of colorectal carcinoma: the efficacy of various types of tissue blocks. J Clin Pathol 2006;59:207-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Talbot IC, Ritchie S, Leighton MH, Hughes AO, Bussey HJ, Morson B. The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1980;67:439-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lapertosa G, Baracchini P, Fulcheri E, Tanzi R. Prognostic value of the immunocytochemical detection of extramural venous invasion in Dukes-C colorectal adenocarcinoma. A preliminary study. Am J Pathol 1989;135:939-5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Inoue T, Mori M, Shimono R, Kuwano H, Sugimachi K. Vascular invasion of colorectal carcinoma readily visible with certain stains. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:34-.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bellis D, Marci V, Monga G. Light microscopic and immunohistochemical evaluation of vascular and neural invasion in colorectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract 1993;189:443-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang JT, Huang KC, Jeng YM, Lee PH, Lai HS, Hsu HC. Microvessel density, cyclo-oxygenase 2 expression, K-ras mutation and p53 overexpression in colonic cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:355-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalekou H, Kostopoulos I, Milias S, Papdimitriou CS. Comparative study of CD34, alpha-SMA and h-caldesmon expression in the stroma of gynaecomastia and male breast carcinoma. Histopathology 2005;47:74–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parums DV, Cordell JL, Micklem K, Heryet AR, Gatter KC, Mason DY. JC70: a new monoclonal antibody that detects vascular endothelium associated antigen on routinely processed tissue sections. J Clin Pathol 1990;43:752-.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gunther K, Dworak O, Remke S, et al. Prediction of distant metastases after curative surgery for rectal cancer. J Surg Res 2002;103:68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giese T, Engstner M, Mansmann U, Hartschuh W, Arden B. Quantification of melanoma micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes using real-time RT-PCR. J Invest Dermatol 2005;124:633-.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hermanek P, Hutter RV, Sobin LH, Wittekind C. International Union Against Cancer. Classification of isolated tumour cells and micrometastasis. Cancer 1999;86:2668-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seitz U, Bohnacker S, Seewald S, et al. Is endoscopic polypectomy an adequate therapy for malignant colorectal adenomas? Presentation of 114 patients and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1789-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, United Kingdom, for providing consumables funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian C. Bateman M.D..

Additional information

Supported by The Institute of Biomedical Sciences, United Kingdom.

About this article

Cite this article

Kingston, E.F., Goulding, H. & Bateman, A.C. Vascular Invasion is Underrecognized in Colorectal Cancer Using Conventional Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 1867–1872 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9021-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9021-6

Key words

Navigation