Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Technical Factors on Outcome of Restorative Proctocolectomy for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

This study was designed to assess the impact of technical factors on functional outcomes and complications in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Methods

This was a descriptive study on 189 patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy in a single tertiary referral center between 1977 and 2003. Primary outcomes were major complications, pouch function, and neoplastic transformation in the anal transitional zone.

Results

Pouch construction was J-reservoir (60 percent), W-reservoir (34 percent), or S-reservoir (6 percent), with double-stapled (31 percent) or handsewn anastomosis with mucosectomy (69 percent). Overall pouch survival was 96 percent at five years and 89 percent at ten years, with no differences according to pouch design or anastomotic technique. The incidence of pelvic sepsis was unaffected by anastomotic technique (stapled vs. handsewn; 12 vs. 13 percent) or type of reservoir (J- vs. W- vs. S-pouch; 16 vs. 9 vs. 10 percent). Fistula formation was independent of anastomotic technique (stapled vs. handsewn; 8 vs. 8 percent) and type of reservoir (J- vs. W- vs. S-pouch; 9 vs. 7 vs. 0 percent). The night-time and 24-hour bowel frequencies were similar with the two anastomotic techniques and types of reservoirs. The incidence of polyps at the anal transitional zone was lower with handsewn than with stapled anastomosis (19 vs. 38 percent; P = 0.047).

Conclusions

Restorative proctocolectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis has good functional outcomes and an acceptable rate of complications, which are independent of choice of technique. Handsewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy seems to reduce the incidence of subsequent neoplasia in the anal transitional zone but does not eliminate the risk of cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KW Kinzler MC Nilbert LK Su et al. (1991) ArticleTitleIdentification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21 Science 253 661–665 Occurrence Handle1651562 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1651562 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK38XlsVCmtrg%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J Groden A Thliveris W Samowitz et al. (1991) ArticleTitleIdentification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene Cell 66 589–600 Occurrence Handle1651174 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0092-8674(81)90021-0 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXmt1Gitr8%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H Bussey (1975) Familial polyposis coli: family studies, histopathology, differential diagnosis, and results of treatment Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  4. KP Nugent AD Spigelman RK Phillips (1993) ArticleTitleLife expectancy after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis Dis Colon Rectum 36 1059–1062 Occurrence Handle8223060 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02047300 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FjvVCgsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C Bulow H Vasen H Jarvinen J Bjork ML Bisgaard S Bulow (2000) ArticleTitleIleorectal anastomosis is appropriate for a subset of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis Gastroenterology 119 1454–1460 Occurrence Handle11113066 Occurrence Handle10.1053/gast.2000.20180 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fnt1ersA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. AG Parks RJ Nicholls (1978) ArticleTitleProctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis BMJ 2 85–88 Occurrence Handle667572 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE1c3ht1amsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.2.6130.85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. AH Kartheuser R Parc CP Penna et al. (1996) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomosis as the first choice operation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a ten-year experience Surgery 119 615–623 Occurrence Handle8650601 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80185-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283kvVWksQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. I Hassan HK Chua BG Wolff et al. (2005) ArticleTitleQuality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis Dis Colon Rectum 48 2032–2037 Occurrence Handle16374935 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-005-0169-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. J Utsunomiya T Iwama M Imajo et al. (1980) ArticleTitleTotal colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 23 459–466 Occurrence Handle6777128 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3M%2Fms1aisg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. RJ Nicholls ME Pezim (1985) ArticleTitleRestorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs Br J Surg 72 470–474 Occurrence Handle4016516 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800720622 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M3ltlKnsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. RJ Heald DR Allen (1986) ArticleTitleStapled ileo-anal anastomosis: a technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operation Br J Surg 73 571–572 Occurrence Handle3730791 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800730719 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL283ntVyjuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D Johnston PJ Holdsworth DG Nasmyth et al. (1987) ArticleTitlePreservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosis Br J Surg 74 940–944 Occurrence Handle3664227 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800741020 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2Fis1SrsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. WA Kmiot MR Keighley (1989) ArticleTitleTotally stapled abdominal restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 76 961–964 Occurrence Handle2804600 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800760931 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FivFelsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. W Tuckson I Lavery V Fazio J Oakley J Church J Milsom (1991) ArticleTitleManometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation Am J Surg 161 90–95 Occurrence Handle1987862 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90366-L Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M7gtlCjtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. RE Lovegrove VA Constantinides AG Heriot et al. (2006) ArticleTitleA comparison of handsewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients Ann Surg 244 18–26 Occurrence Handle16794385 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000225031.15405.a3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. FH Remzi JM Church J Bast et al. (2001) ArticleTitleMucosectomy vs. stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: functional outcome and neoplasia control Dis Colon Rectum 44 1590–1596 Occurrence Handle11711729 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234377 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnmsFKhtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. FH Remzi VW Fazio CP Delaney et al. (2003) ArticleTitleDysplasia of the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of prospective evaluation after a minimum of ten years Dis Colon Rectum 46 6–13 Occurrence Handle12544515 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6488-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lovegrove RE, Heriot AG, Constantinides VA, et al. A comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal pouch reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis, DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463–1318.2006.01093.x, September 12, 2006

  19. HJ Silva Particlede CP Angelis Particlede N Soper MG Kettlewell NJ Mortensen DP Jewell (1991) ArticleTitleClinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 78 1039–1044 Occurrence Handle1933182 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800780905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. J Romanos DN Samarasekera JF Stebbing DP Jewell MG Kettlewell NJ Mortensen (1997) ArticleTitleOutcome of 200 restorative proctocolectomy operations: the John Radcliffe Hospital experience Br J Surg 84 814–818 Occurrence Handle9189096 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800840623 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szjt12gtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. F Selvaggi A Giuliani C Gallo G Signoriello G Riegler S Canonico (2000) ArticleTitleRandomized, controlled trial to compare the J-pouch and W-pouch configurations for ulcerative colitis in the maturation period Dis Colon Rectum 43 615–620 Occurrence Handle10826420 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02235573 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3osVKmsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. WE Hueting E Buskens I Tweel Particlevan der HG Gooszen CJ Laarhoven Particlevan (2005) ArticleTitleResults and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients Dig Surg 22 69–79 Occurrence Handle15838175 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000085356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. P Duijvendijk Particlevan JF Slors CW Taat P Oosterveld HF Vasen (1999) ArticleTitleFunctional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis Ann Surg 230 648–654 Occurrence Handle10561088 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199911000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. P Duijvendijk Particlevan JF Slors CW Taat et al. (2000) ArticleTitleQuality of life after total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis Br J Surg 87 590–596 Occurrence Handle10792315 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01442.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. DC Nyam PT Brillant RR Dozois KA Kelly JH Pemberton BG Wolff (1997) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal canal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: early and late results Ann Surg 226 514–521 Occurrence Handle9351719 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199710000-00012 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fht1Srtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Y Parc A Piquard RR Dozois R Parc E Tiret (2004) ArticleTitleLong-term outcome of familial adenomatous polyposis patients after restorative coloproctectomy Ann Surg 239 378–382 Occurrence Handle15075655 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000114216.90947.f6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. P Duijvendijk Particlevan HF Vasen L Bertario et al. (1999) ArticleTitleCumulative risk of developing polyps or malignancy at the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis J Gastrointest Surg 3 325–330 Occurrence Handle10481126 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(99)80075-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. PR O’Connell JH Pemberton LH Weiland et al. (1987) ArticleTitleDoes rectal mucosa regenerate after ileoanal anastomosis? Dis Colon Rectum 30 1–5 Occurrence Handle3803100 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02556908 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiC3cvovFI%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. J Church (2005) ArticleTitleIleoanal pouch neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis: an underestimated threat Dis Colon Rectum 48 1708–1713 Occurrence Handle15937627 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-005-0057-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. CJ Groves G Beveridge DJ Swain et al. (2005) ArticleTitlePrevalence and morphology of pouch and ileal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis Dis Colon Rectum 48 816–823 Occurrence Handle15747076 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0835-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. SK Clark RK Phillips (1996) ArticleTitleDesmoids in familial adenomatous polyposis Br J Surg 83 1494–1504 Occurrence Handle9014661 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800831105 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s7ms12ksA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kay Neale and the staff of the Polyposis Registry at St. Mark’s Hospital for providing valuable assistance and additional patient follow-up data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paris P. Tekkis M.D., F.R.C.S..

About this article

Cite this article

von Roon, A.C., Tekkis, P.P., Clark, S.K. et al. The Impact of Technical Factors on Outcome of Restorative Proctocolectomy for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 952–961 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0872-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0872-z

Key words

Navigation