Purpose
Traditional length of hospital stay after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is 8 to 15 days. Fast track rehabilitation programs reduce stay, but there are concerns that readmission and complication rates may be increased. This study evaluated a fast track pathway after ileoanal pouch surgery.
Methods
One hundred three consecutive patients underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on two colorectal services using a fast track protocol with early ambulation, diet, and defined discharge criteria. Direct hospital costs and 30-day and long-term complication data were collected. Patients were matched to controls managed with traditional care pathways by other colorectal staff.
Results
Matching was established for 97 patients. Fast track patients had shorter hospital stay than controls (median 4 vs. 5 days; mean 5.0 vs. 5.9, P = 0.012). Readmission and recurrent operation rates were similar (24 vs. 20 percent, P = 0.49, and 9 vs. 10 percent, P = 0.8, fast track vs. control, respectively). Median direct costs per patient (US$) within 30 days were lower with fast track (5692 vs. 6672, P = 0.001), primarily because of reductions in postoperative management expenses. Complication rates, including pouch failure, bowel obstruction, pouchitis, and anastomotic stricture were comparable. Early discharge (≤ 5 days from surgery) occurred in 79 (77 percent) fast track patients. Failure with early discharge was associated with male gender, reoperations, and anastomotic complications.
Conclusions
Fast track protocol after ileoanal pouch surgery reduces length of stay and hospital costs without increasing complication rates. Successful early discharge usually signals a benign postoperative course.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AG Parks RJ Nicholls (1978) ArticleTitleProctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis BMJ 2 85–88 Occurrence Handle667572 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE1c3ht1amsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.2.6130.85
P Setti-Carraro JK Ritchie KH Wilkinson RJ Nicholls PR Hawley (1994) ArticleTitleThe first 10 years’ experience of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis Gut 35 1070–1075 Occurrence Handle7926908 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FhtFOgtw%3D%3D
VW Fazio Y Ziv JM Church et al. (1995) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients Ann Surg 222 120–127 Occurrence Handle7639579 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199508000-00003 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2Mzms1yiuw%3D%3D
CP Delaney VW Fazio FH Remzi et al. (2003) ArticleTitleProspective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Ann Surg 238 221–228 Occurrence Handle12894015
SB Archer RJ Burnett LV Flesch et al. (1997) ArticleTitleImplementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and hospital charges for patients undergoing total colectomy and ileal pouch/anal anastomosis Surgery 122 699–705 Occurrence Handle9347845 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90076-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FgslGgtw%3D%3D
BR Swenson CS Hollenbeak WA Koltun (2003) ArticleTitleFactors affecting cost and length of stay associated with the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 46 754–761 Occurrence Handle12794577 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6653-7
CP Delaney VW Fazio AJ Senagore B Robinson AL Halverson FH Remzi (2001) ArticleTitle‘Fast track’ postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery Br J Surg 88 1533–1538 Occurrence Handle11683754 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01905.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MngvF2mtw%3D%3D
CP Delaney M Zutshi AJ Senagore FH Remzi J Hammel VW Fazio (2003) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection Dis Colon Rectum 46 851–859 Occurrence Handle12847356 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6672-4
L Basse JE Thorbol K Lossl H Kehlet (2004) ArticleTitleColonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care Dis Colon Rectum 47 271–278 Occurrence Handle14991487 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-003-0055-0
L Basse DH Jakobsen L Bardram et al. (2005) ArticleTitleFunctional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study Ann Surg 241 416–423 Occurrence Handle15729063 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000154149.85506.36
L Basse HH Raskov D Hjort Jakobsen et al. (2002) ArticleTitleAccelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition Br J Surg 89 446–453 Occurrence Handle11952586 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02044.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383hs1KqsA%3D%3D
L Basse D Hjort Jakobsen P Billesbolle M Werner H Kehlet (2000) ArticleTitleA clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection Ann Surg 232 51–57 Occurrence Handle10862195 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200007000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czitVCqsQ%3D%3D
KE Behrns AP Kircher JA Galanko MR Brownstein MJ Koruda (2000) ArticleTitleProspective randomized trial of early initiation and hospital discharge on a liquid diet following elective intestinal surgery J Gastrointest Surg 4 217–221 Occurrence Handle10675246 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80059-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jvFKrtA%3D%3D
LA Di Fronzo J Cymerman TX O’Connell (1999) ArticleTitleFactors affecting early postoperative feeding following elective open colon resection Arch Surg 134 941–946 Occurrence Handle10487587 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.134.9.941 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvhsFGhug%3D%3D
LA DiFronzo N Yamin K Patel TX O’Connell (2003) ArticleTitleBenefits of early feeding and early hospital discharge in elderly patients undergoing open colon resection J Am Coll Surg 197 747–752 Occurrence Handle14585408 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00794-4
M Zutshi CP Delaney AJ Senagore VW Fazio (2004) ArticleTitleShorter hospital stay associated with fast track postoperative care pathways and laparoscopic intestinal resection are not associated with increased physical activity Colorectal Dis 6 477–480 Occurrence Handle15521939 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00692.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crltVKgsA%3D%3D
M Zutshi CP Delaney AJ Senagore et al. (2005) ArticleTitleRandomized controlled trial comparing the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet pathway versus the cotrolled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet with preemptive epidural anesthesia/analgesia after laparotomy and intestinal resection Am J Surg 189 268–272 Occurrence Handle15792748 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.11.012
CP Delaney RP Kiran AJ Senagore K Brady VW Fazio (2003) ArticleTitleCase-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery Ann Surg 238 67–72 Occurrence Handle12832967 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200307000-00009
L Basse P Billesbolle H Kehlet (2002) ArticleTitleEarly recovery after abdominal rectopexy with multimodal rehabilitation Dis Colon Rectum 45 195–199 Occurrence Handle11852332 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6145-9
L Basse DH Jacobsen P Billesbolle H Kehlet (2002) ArticleTitleColostomy closure after Hartmann’s procedure with fast-track rehabilitation Dis Colon Rectum 45 1661–4 Occurrence Handle12473891 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-7255-0
H Kehlet T Mogensen (1999) ArticleTitleHospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme Br J Surg 86 227–230 Occurrence Handle10100792 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01023.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7pvVyqsw%3D%3D
RP Kiran CP Delaney AJ Senagore M Steel T Garafalo VW Fazio (2004) ArticleTitleOutcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery J Am Coll Surg 198 877–883 Occurrence Handle15194068 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.01.036
PP Goodney TA Stukel FL Lucas EV Finlayson JD Birkmeyer (2003) ArticleTitleHospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery Ann Surg 238 161–167 Occurrence Handle12894006
SR Gorfine IM Gelernt JJ Bauer MT Harris I Kreel (1995) ArticleTitleRestorative proctocolectomy without diverting ileostomy Dis Colon Rectum 38 188–194 Occurrence Handle7851175 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02052449 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M7lsVSksw%3D%3D
F Michelassi J Lee M Rubin et al. (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study Ann Surg 238 433–445 Occurrence Handle14501509
AR MacLean Z Cohen HM MacRae et al. (2002) ArticleTitleRisk of small bowel obstruction after the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Ann Surg 235 200–206 Occurrence Handle11807359 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200202000-00007
BR Swenson CS Hollenbeak LS Poritz WA Koltun (2005) ArticleTitleModified two-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: equivalent outcomes with less resource utilization Dis Colon Rectum 48 256–261 Occurrence Handle15711857 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0848-9
PA Seshadri EC Poulin CM Schlachta MO Cadeddu J Mamazza (2001) ArticleTitleDoes a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages? Surg Endosc 15 837–842 Occurrence Handle11443423 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640000356 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrksFSitA%3D%3D
P Kienle J Weitz A Benner C Herfarth J Schmidt (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy Surg Endosc 17 716–720 Occurrence Handle12616394 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-9159-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3hsFGltA%3D%3D
P Kienle K Z’graggen J Schmidt A Benner J Weitz MW Buchler (2005) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 92 88–93 Occurrence Handle15593294 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4772 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2Fhs1ehug%3D%3D
SD Wexner SM Cera (2005) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis Surg Clin North Am 85 35–47 Occurrence Handle15619527 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.suc.2004.09.009
DE Rivadeneira PW Marcello PL Roberts et al. (2004) ArticleTitleBenefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study Dis Colon Rectum 47 1371–1376 Occurrence Handle15484352 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0587-y
K Nakajima SW Lee C Cocilovo C Foglia T Sonoda JW Milsom (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total colectomy: hand-assisted vs standard technique Surg Endosc 18 582–586 Occurrence Handle15026921 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8648-6
S Maartense MS Dunker JF Slors et al. (2004) ArticleTitleHand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial Ann Surg 240 984–992 Occurrence Handle15570204 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000145923.03130.1c
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Kariv, Y., Delaney, C.P., Senagore, A.J. et al. Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a “Fast Track” Postoperative Care Pathway for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. A Case Control Study. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 137–146 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0760-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0760-6