Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 49, Issue 10, pp 1569–1573

Efficacy of Anal Fistula Plug in Closure of Crohn’s Anorectal Fistulas

  • Lynn O’Connor
  • Bradley J. Champagne
  • Martha A. Ferguson
  • Guy R. Orangio
  • Marion E. Schertzer
  • David N. Armstrong
Article
  • 87 Downloads

Purpose

The efficacy of Surgisis® anal fistula plug in closure of Crohn’s anorectal fistula was studied.

Methods

Patients with Crohn’s anorectal fistulas were prospectively studied. Diagnosis was made by histologic, radiographic, or endoscopic criteria. Variables recorded were: number of fistula tracts (primary openings), presence of setons, and current antitumor necrosis factor therapy. Under general anesthesia and in prone jackknife position, patients underwent irrigation of the fistula tract by using hydrogen peroxide. Each primary opening was occluded by using a Surgisis® anal fistula plug. Superficial tracts amenable to fistulotomy were excluded.

Results

Twenty consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled, comprising a total of 36 fistula tracts. At final follow-up, all fistula tracts had been successfully closed in 16 of 20 patients, for an overall success rate of 80 percent. Thirty of 36 individual fistula tracts (83 percent) were closed at final follow-up. Patients with single fistulas (with 1 primary opening) were most likely to have successful closure using the anal fistula plug. Successful closure was not correlated with the presence of setons or antitumor necrosis factor therapy.

Conclusions

Closure of Crohn’s anorectal fistula tracts using Surgisis® anal fistula plug is safe and successful in 80 percent of patients and 83 percent of fistula tracts. Closure rates were higher with single tracts than complex fistulas with multiple primary openings.

Key words

Crohn’s disease Anorectal fistula Surgisis® anal fistula plug Fistulotomy Endoanal flap Fibrin glue 

References

  1. 1.
    Williamson, PR, Hellinger, MD, Larach, SW, Ferrara, A 1995Twenty-year review of the surgical management of perianal Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum38389392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marks, CG, Ritchie, JK, Lockhart-Mummery, HE 1981Anal fistulas in Crohn’s diseaseBr J Surg68525527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams, JG, Rothenberger, DA, Nemer, FD, Goldberg, SM 1991Fistula-in-ano in Crohn’s disease: results of aggressive surgical treatmentDis Colon Rectum34378384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fry, RD, Shemesh, EI, Kodner, IJ, Timmcke, A 1981Techniques and results in the management of anal and perianal Crohn’s diseaseSurg Gynecol Obstet1684248Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morrison, JG, Gathright, JB,Jr, Ray, JE, Ferrari, BT, Hicks, TC 1989Surgical management of anorectal fistulas in Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum32492496PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thornton, M, Solomon, MJ 2005Long-term indwelling setons for complex anal fistulas in Crohn’s diseaseDis Colon Rectum48459463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bodegraven, AA, Sloots, CE, Felt-Bersma, RJ, Meuwissen, SG 2002Endosonographic evidence of persistence of Crohn’s disease-associated fistulas after infliximab treatment, irrespective of clinical responseDis Colon Rectum453945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Present, DH, Rutgeers, P, Targan, S,  et al. 1999Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s diseaseN Engl J Med34013981405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson, EK, Gaw, JU, Armstrong, DN 2006Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulasDis Colon Rectum49371376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Badylak, SF 2002The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstructionSemin Cell Dev Biol13377383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Badylak, SF 1993

    Small intestinal submucosa (SIS): a biomaterial conducive to smart tissue remodeling

    Bell, E eds. Tissue engineering: current perspectivesBurkhauser PublishersCambridge179189
    Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ueno, T, Pickett, LC, Feunte, SG, Lawson, DC, Pappas, TN 2004Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defectsJ Gastrointest Surg8109112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franklin, ME,Jr, Gonzalez, JJ,Jr, Glass, JL 2004Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernias in contaminated fields: 2-year follow-upHernia8186189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Helton, WS, Fisichella, PM, Berger, R, Horgan, S, Espat, NJ, Abcarian, H 2005Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal herniaArch Surg140549562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynn O’Connor
    • 1
  • Bradley J. Champagne
    • 1
  • Martha A. Ferguson
    • 1
  • Guy R. Orangio
    • 1
  • Marion E. Schertzer
    • 1
  • David N. Armstrong
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia Colon and Rectal Surgical ClinicAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations