Abstract
PURPOSE: The number of operations to reach a plateau phase in colorectal laparoscopic surgery is still under debate. There are few publications reporting on multidimensional assessment of the learning curve, including operation time and complication and conversion rates. The purpose of this study was to define a multidimensional learning curve for sigmoid resection performed by two surgeons with experience in laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2001 from a total of 715 laparoscopic colorectal procedures, two surgeons performed self-educated 338 sigmoid resections. Demographic data, indications for surgery, procedure performed, operation time, frequency and kind of complications, conversion rate, and days to discharge were recorded. The moving average method was used to demonstrate the change of the operation time. The cumulative sum technique was used to chart the changes in the conversion and complication rates. RESULTS: Surgeon A performed 199 and Surgeon B 139 sigmoid resections. The operation time decreased from 225 minutes to 169 minutes after approximately 90 operations for Surgeon A and from 270 minutes to 223 minutes after 110 operations for Surgeon B. Based on a decline in intraoperative complications and conversion rate, the steady state was reached after approximately 70 to 80 interventions for both surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of a learning curve should not be limited to measurement of a decrease in operation time but should also include the conversion and complication rates. The cumulative sum technique and moving average method as proposed in this study seem appropriate to evaluate the learning curve in this clinical domain. Our findings might be especially useful for those planning training programs in laparoscopic surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P Buchmann D Christen (2002) ArticleTitlePro Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer Dig Surg 12 296–301
HH Chen SD Wexner EG Weiss et al. (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy for benign colorectal disease is associated with a significant reduction in disability as compared with laparotomy Surg Endosc 12 1397–1400
ME Franklin SuffixJr D Rosenthal D Abrego-Medina et al. (1996) ArticleTitleProspective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma Dis Colon Rectum 39 35–46
AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas S Delgado et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer Lancet 359 2224–2229
AJ Senagore HJ Duepree CP Delaney S Dissanaike KM Brady VW Fazio (2002) ArticleTitleCost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease Dis Colon Rectum 45 485–490
CM Schlachta J Mamazza PA Seshadri M Cadeddu R Gregoire EC Poulin (2001) ArticleTitleDefining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections Dis Colon Rectum 44 217–222
DA Rogers AS Elstein G Bordage (2001) ArticleTitleImproving continuing medical education for surgical techniques Ann Surg 233 159–166
A Bartlett B Parry (2001) ArticleTitleCusum analysis of trends in operative selection and conversion rates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy ANZ J Surg 71 453–456
BR Parry HS Goh (1993) ArticleTitleQuality control in colonoscopy Int J Colorectal Dis 8 139–141
BR Parry SM Williams (1991) ArticleTitleCompetency and the colonoscopist ANZ J Surg 61 419–422
AB Nix RJ Rowlands KW Kemp DW Wilson K Griffiths (1987) ArticleTitleInternal quality control in clinical chemistry Stat Med 6 425–440
AM Van Rij JR McDonald RA Pettigrew MJ Putterill CK Reddy JJ Wright (1995) ArticleTitleCusum as an aid to early assessment of the surgical trainee Br J Surg 82 1500–1503
F Agachan JS Joo M Sher EG Weiss JJ Nogueras SD Wexner (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11 331–335
E Page (1954) ArticleTitleContinuous inspection schemes Biometrika 41 100–115
R Kenett M Pollak (1983) ArticleTitleOn sequential detection of a shift in the probability of a rare event J Am Stat Assoc 78 389–395
DG Altman JP Royston (1988) ArticleTitleThe hidden effect of time Stat Med 7 629–637
CM Schlachta J Mamazza PA Seshadri MO Cadeddu EC Poulin (2000) ArticleTitlePredicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections. A simple clinical model Surg Endosc 14 1114–1117
P Hermanek H Wiebelt D Staimmer S Riedl (1995) ArticleTitlePrognostic factors of rectum carcinoma: experience of the German Multicentre Study SGCRC. German Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma Tumori 81 60–64
A Darzi S Smith N Taffinder (1999) ArticleTitleAssessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective BMJ 318 887–888
TR Eubanks RH Clements D Pohl et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAn objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Am Coll Surg 189 566–574
N Taffinder S Smith J Jansen B Ardehali D Russell A Darzi (1998) ArticleTitleObjective measurement of surgical dexterity-validation of the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) Minimal Invas Ther Allied Techniq 7 11–574
N Taffinder I McManus J Jansen D Russell A Darzi (1998) ArticleTitleAn objective assessment of surgeons psychomotor skills Br J Surg 85 75–574
JG Hunter JM Sackier G Berci (1994) ArticleTitleTraining in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Quantifying the learning curve Surg Endosc 8 28–31
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Dinçler, S., Koller, M.T., Steurer, J. et al. Multidimensional Analysis of Learning Curves in Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 1371–1378 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6752-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6752-5