Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors Affecting Cost and Length of Stay Associated With the Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the costs associated with the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedure and identify those factors that most affected or determined such costs. Specifically evaluated were the costs, complication rates, and length of stay associated with the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis done as a one-stage, two-stage, two-stage modified, or three-stage procedure. METHODS: Costs from the hospital accounting database and clinical data from retrospective chart review of 135 ileal pouch-anal anastomosis patients from a ten-year period were compiled. Overall costs and length of stay (the sum of all hospitalizations for all surgeries and any related complications) for each group were compared by analysis of variance. Linear regression was used to compute net costs and length of stay excluding contributions from other relevant factors such as number of operative stages, complications, demographics, and nonelective operations. RESULTS: The average overall cost and length of stay of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis ranged from a low of $12,738 and 13.5 days for the one-stage procedure to a high of $32,758 and 23.9 days for the three-stage pathway. Overall costs, length of stay, and incidence of complications increased with the number of operations necessary to complete the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. This pattern of increased costs and length of stay with the greater number of stages persisted even after demographic and preoperative characteristics were controlled for in the analyses. The occurrence of a complication added an average of $9,304 (P < 0.0001) and 7.4 days to the procedure (P = 0.0002), whereas an urgent presentation added an average of $5,258 (P = 0.15) and 6.1 days (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The two most definitive determinants of cost and length of stay after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis are complications and number of operative stages used to complete the operation. Elective ileal pouch-anal anastomosis operations done in the fewest stages with the least complications provide the least costly result and the shortest hospital stay. For patients with severe disease, the two-stage modified pathway (total abdominal colectomy followed by pouch creation without a protecting ileostomy) appears to have fewer complications, lower costs, and a shorter length of stay than the traditional three-stage pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. VW Fazio Y Ziv JM Church et al. (1995) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients Ann Surg 222 120–127

    Google Scholar 

  2. AR MacLean Z Cohen HM MacRae et al. (2002) ArticleTitleRisk of small bowel obstruction after the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Ann Surg 235 200–206

    Google Scholar 

  3. S Galandiuk BG Wolff RR Dozois RW Beart SuffixJr (1991) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomosis without ileostomy Dis Colon Rectum 34 870–873

    Google Scholar 

  4. RJ Nicholls SD Holt DZ Lubowski (1989) ArticleTitleRestorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir Dis Colon Rectum 32 323–326

    Google Scholar 

  5. PM Sagar W Lewis PJ Holdsworth D Johnston (1992) ArticleTitleOne-stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary defunctioning ileostomy Dis Colon Rectum 35 582–588

    Google Scholar 

  6. HJ Sugerman EL Sugerman JG Meador et al. (2000) ArticleTitleIleal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion Ann Surg 232 530–541

    Google Scholar 

  7. UA Heuschen U Hinz EH Allemeyer M Lucas G Heuschen C Herfarth (2001) ArticleTitleOne- or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy Ann Surg 234 788–794

    Google Scholar 

  8. BR Swenson CS Hollenbeak WA Koltun (2002) ArticleTitleHospital costs and risk factors associated with complications of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis Surgery 132 767–774

    Google Scholar 

  9. JS Bender DL Bouwman (1994) ArticleTitleTotal abdominal colectomy Am Surg 60 205–209

    Google Scholar 

  10. DP Ondrula RL Nelson ML Prasad BW Coyle H Abcarian (1992) ArticleTitleMultifactorial index of preoperative risk factors in colon resections Dis Colon Rectum 35 117–122

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Swenson, B.R., Hollenbeak, C.S. & Koltun, W.A. Factors Affecting Cost and Length of Stay Associated With the Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 754–761 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6653-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6653-7

Keywords

Navigation