Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endosonographic Imaging of Anal Sphincter Injury

Does the Size of the Tear Correlate With the Degree of Dysfunction?

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the extent of anal sphincter muscle injury as graded at endosonography correlates with the degree of functional impairment. METHODS: Three hundred and thirty adults presenting for evaluation of fecal incontinence were recruited. Ultrasound was performed with a 7.5-MHz radial rotating axial endoprobe in the left lateral position. Anal sphincter muscle tears were graded on the basis of the degree of circumferential involvement (< or >25 percent) and by an assessment of the superoinferior longitudinal extent of an external anal sphincter tear. Muscles that demonstrated multiple tears, poor visualization, or fragmentation were classed as fragmented. Sphincter injuries were correlated with basal and squeeze pressures at manometry, pudendal nerve terminal latencies, and the severity of symptoms using the Parks-Browning clinical score. RESULTS: Patients with an intact external anal sphincter had a higher squeeze pressure (mean, 162.6 cm H2O) than those with a partial- (mean, 125.7 cm H2O) or full-length tear (mean, 124.9 cm H2O; P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in squeeze pressure between those with partial- vs. full-length external anal sphincter tears nor between circumference tears < or >25 percent. Basal pressure was significantly lower in those with a full-length external anal sphincter tear (47.8 cm H2O) vs. an intact external anal sphincter (65.7 cm H2O; P < 0.001). The basal pressure in those with an intact internal anal sphincter was not significantly different from those with clearly defined internal anal sphincter tears, and the degree of circumferential involvement was also not important in this regard. However, those with a fragmented internal anal sphincter had a significantly lower basal pressure than other subgroups of internal anal sphincter injuries (P < 0.001). There was no association between external or internal anal sphincter status and the mean pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, suggesting the patient groups were neurologically similar. There was no significant association between external or internal anal sphincter status and the severity of reported symptoms. CONCLUSION: Correlations between the presence or absence of muscle tears and reduced manometric function have been identified. Further grading of tears was of less importance. No relationship between muscle injuries and the severity of clinical symptoms could be elicited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B Frenckner (1975) ArticleTitleFunction of the anal sphincters in spinal man Gut 16 638–644

    Google Scholar 

  2. B Frenckner CV Euler (1975) ArticleTitleInfluence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters Gut 16 482–489

    Google Scholar 

  3. AP Zbar M Beer-Gabel AC Chiappa M Aslam (2001) ArticleTitleFecal incontinence after minor anorectal surgery Dis Colon Rectum 44 1610–1619

    Google Scholar 

  4. AH Sultan RB Johanson JE Carter (1998) ArticleTitleOccult anal sphincter trauma following randomized forceps and vacuum delivery Int J Gynaecol Obstet 61 113–119

    Google Scholar 

  5. S Karoui . Savoye-Collet E Koning AM Leroi P Denis (1999) ArticleTitlePrevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed by sonography in 335 incontinent patients and 115 continent patients AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 389–392

    Google Scholar 

  6. L Abramowitz I Sobhani R Ganansia et al. (2000) ArticleTitleAre sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study Dis Colon Rectum 43 590–598

    Google Scholar 

  7. N Rieger A Schloithe G Saccone D Wattchow (1998) ArticleTitleA prospective study of anal sphincter injury due to childbirth Scand J Gastroenterol 33 950–955

    Google Scholar 

  8. JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97

    Google Scholar 

  9. PJ Law MA Kamm CI Bartram (1991) ArticleTitleAnal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence Br J Surg 78 312–314

    Google Scholar 

  10. KI Deen D Kumar JG Williams J Oliff MR Keighley (1993) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter defects Ann Surg 218 201–205

    Google Scholar 

  11. T Tetzschner M Sorensen G Lose J Christiansen (1996) ArticleTitleAnal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103 1034–1040

    Google Scholar 

  12. MB Nielsen C Hauge JF Pedersen J Christiansen (1993) ArticleTitleEndosonographic evaluation of patients with anal incontinence AJR Am J Roentgenol 160 771–775

    Google Scholar 

  13. M Sorensen T Tetzschner OO Rasmussen J Bjarnesen J Christiansen (1993) ArticleTitleSphincter rupture in childbirth Br J Surg 80 392–394

    Google Scholar 

  14. JP Zetterstrom A Mellgren RD Madoff DG Kim D Wong (1998) ArticleTitlePerineal body measurement improves evaluation of anterior sphincter lesions during endoanal ultrasonography Dis Colon Rectum 41 705–713

    Google Scholar 

  15. GG Browning AG Parks (1983) ArticleTitlePostanal repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence Br J Surg 70 101–104

    Google Scholar 

  16. YP Sangwan JA Solla (1998) ArticleTitleInternal anal sphincter Dis Colon Rectum 41 1297–1311

    Google Scholar 

  17. M Wunderlich AG Parks (1982) ArticleTitlePhysiology and pathophysiology of the anal sphincters Int Surg 67 291–298

    Google Scholar 

  18. CJ Vaizey MA Kamm CI Bartram (1997) ArticleTitlePrimary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence Lancet 349 612–615

    Google Scholar 

  19. SJ Burnett C Spence-Jones CT Speakman MA Kamm CN Hudson CI Bartram (1991) ArticleTitleUnsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by anal endosonography Br J Radiol 64 225–227

    Google Scholar 

  20. F Voyvodic AC Schloithe DA Wattchow NA Rieger R Scroop GT Saccone (2000) ArticleTitleDelayed pudendal nerve conduction and endosonographic appearance of the anal sphincter complex Dis Colon Rectum 43 1689–1694

    Google Scholar 

  21. R Schafer T Heyer B Gantke et al. (1997) ArticleTitleAnal endosonography and manometry Dis Colon Rectum 40 293–297

    Google Scholar 

  22. AH Sultan MA Kamm CN Hudson JR Nicholls CI Bartram (1994) ArticleTitleEndosonography of the anal sphincters Clin Radiol 49 368–374

    Google Scholar 

  23. B Gantke A Schafer P Enck HJ Lubke (1993) ArticleTitleSonographic, manometric, and myographic evaluation of the anal sphincters morphology and function Dis Colon Rectum 36 1037–1041

    Google Scholar 

  24. WE Whitehead A Wald NJ Norton (2001) ArticleTitleTreatment options for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 44 131–144

    Google Scholar 

  25. TH Rockwood JM Church JW Fleshman et al. (2000) ArticleTitleFecal incontinence quality of life scale Dis Colon Rectum 43 9–17

    Google Scholar 

  26. CI Bartram AH Sultan (1995) ArticleTitleAnal endosonography in faecal incontinence Gut 37 4–6

    Google Scholar 

  27. LL Jensen AC Lowry (1997) ArticleTitleBiofeedback improves functional outcome after sphincteroplasty Dis Colon Rectum 40 197–200

    Google Scholar 

  28. C Savoye-Collet G Savoye E Koning et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAnal endosonography after sphincter repair Abdom Imaging 24 569–573

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Voyvodic, F., Rieger, N.A., Skinner, S. et al. Endosonographic Imaging of Anal Sphincter Injury. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 735–741 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6650-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6650-x

Keywords

Navigation