Skip to main content
Log in

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Diathermy Hemorrhoidectomy vs. Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy in an Intended Day-Care Setting With Longer-Term Follow-Up

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hemorrhoidectomy is the most effective long-term treatment for hemorrhoids. Although it is possible to perform hemorrhoidectomy as a day case with a high degree of patient satisfaction, patients take an average of 14 days off work after surgery. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is believed to be less painful than conventional hemorrhoidectomy and should allow an earlier return to work. The aim of this study was to compare both the immediate and the long-term results of stapled hemorrhoidectomy with diathermy hemorrhoidectomy in patients with prolapsing internal hemorrhoids in an intended day-care setting. METHODS: Thirty-one patients were randomly assigned to undergo diathermy hemorrhoidectomy (n = 16) or stapled hemorrhoidectomy performed with a purpose-designed endoluminal stapling device, PPH01T™ (n = 15). All operations were planned as day or short-stay cases. All patients received lactulose, commenced preoperatively, together with postoperative topical glyceryl trinitrate and oral metronidazole. Patients were assessed by structured interview to assess their symptoms before and after surgery, with an intended follow-up of six months. All patients completed a 10-cm visual analog pain scale daily for the first ten days after surgery. RESULTS: The total pain score (sum of all pain scores) was significantly higher in the diathermy group (50 (range, 9.8–79.9) vs. 19.6 (range, 1.3–89.5), P = 0.03). Patients took a median of 14 (range, 3–21) days off work after diathermy hemorrhoidectomy compared with 10 (range, 3–38) days for the patients undergoing stapled hemorrhoidectomy (P = 0.15). At long-term follow-up, three patients (all in the stapled group) developed new symptoms of fecal urgency and anal pain, and three patients required further surgery to remove symptomatic external hemorrhoids after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although stapled hemorrhoidectomy is less painful in the short term, this does not lead to a significantly earlier return to work, and some patients develop new symptoms at long-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DG Wechter GK Luna (1987) ArticleTitleAn unusual complication of rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids Dis Colon Rectum 30 137–140

    Google Scholar 

  2. N Bullock (1997) ArticleTitleImpotence after sclerotherapy of hemorrhoids BMJ 314 419–140

    Google Scholar 

  3. HM MacRae RS McLeod (1995) ArticleTitleComparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities Dis Colon Rectum 38 687–694

    Google Scholar 

  4. NJ London PD Bramley R Windle (1987) ArticleTitleEffect of four days of preoperative lactulose on posthemorrhoidectomy pain BMJ 295 363–364

    Google Scholar 

  5. EA Carapeti MA Kamm PJ McDonald RK Phillips (1998) ArticleTitleDouble-blind randomized controlled trial of effect of metronidazole on pain after day-case hemorrhoidectomy Lancet 351 169–172

    Google Scholar 

  6. BJ Mehigan JR Monson JE Hartley (2000) ArticleTitleStapling procedure for hemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 782–785

    Google Scholar 

  7. M Rowsell M Bello DM Hemingway (2000) ArticleTitleCircumferential mucosectomy (stapled hemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 779–781

    Google Scholar 

  8. PB Loder RK Phillips (1993) ArticleTitleHemorrhoidectomy Curr Pract Surg 5 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  9. MJ Cheetham NJ Mortensen PO Nystrom MA Kamm RK Phillips (2000) ArticleTitlePersistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled hemorrhoidectomy Lancet 356 730–733

    Google Scholar 

  10. L Hunt AJ Luck G Rudkin PJ Hewett (1999) ArticleTitleDay-case hemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 86 255–258

    Google Scholar 

  11. JH Jongen JU Bock (2000) ArticleTitlePain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [letter] Lancet 356 2187–258

    Google Scholar 

  12. A Herold JJ Kirsch (2000) ArticleTitlePain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [letter] Lancet 356 2187–258

    Google Scholar 

  13. M Pescatori (2000) ArticleTitlePain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [letter] Lancet 356 2188–258

    Google Scholar 

  14. M Rowsell M Bello DM Hemingway (2000) ArticleTitlePain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [letter] Lancet 356 2188–258

    Google Scholar 

  15. GC Beattie MA Loudon (2000) ArticleTitlePain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [letter] Lancet 356 2189–258

    Google Scholar 

  16. A Longo (2000) ArticleTitlePain after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [letter] Lancet 356 2189–2190

    Google Scholar 

  17. F Seow-Choen (2001) ArticleTitleStapled hemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 88 1–3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Cheetham, M.J., Cohen, C.R., Kamm, M.A. et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Diathermy Hemorrhoidectomy vs. Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy in an Intended Day-Care Setting With Longer-Term Follow-Up. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 491–497 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6588-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6588-z

Keywords

Navigation