Skip to main content
Log in

Loop Ileostomy Closure at an Ambulatory Surgery Facility

A Safe and Cost-Effective Alternative to Routine Hospitalization

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Temporary loop ileostomies have become widely used in colorectal surgery. Subsequent ileostomy closure has traditionally required hospital admission with observation until return of bowel function. On the basis of clinical observation, the authors hypothesized that loop ileostomy closure may be performed safely without prolonged in-hospital observation. METHODS: A protocol for 23-hour observation after loop ileostomy closure was implemented at a single institution and applied to 28 patients at an ambulatory surgery facility. Patient outcomes were reviewed and results compared with a cohort of 30 patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure before introduction of the protocol. RESULTS: The study and control groups were statistically similar in age, gender, diseases, and duration after original operation. Twenty-eight patients underwent loop ileostomy closure, and all were discharged the following day. Two patients were admitted for nausea and vomiting within 48 hours after closure and remained in the hospital for two and four days, respectively. One of these patients was readmitted 12 days after surgery with an abdominal abscess that was drained percutaneously. The mean cost per patient in the study group was $2,665. For the control population, the mean hospital stay was 2.9 days. Return of bowel function was delayed in two patients, resulting in prolonged hospital stays of six and eight days, respectively. Two patients were readmitted after discharge for nausea and vomiting. The mean cost per cohort patient was $3,811. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure may be discharged safely after overnight observation without increased complications or hospital readmissions. This practice significantly reduces the use of hospital resources and decreases economic cost without compromising care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SD Wexner DA Taranow OB Johansen et al. (1993) ArticleTitleLoop ileostomy is a safe option for fecal diversion Dis Colon Rectum 36 349–354

    Google Scholar 

  2. N Dehni RD Schlegel C Cunningham M Guiguet E Tiret R Parc (1998) ArticleTitleInfluence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis Br J Surg 85 1114–1117

    Google Scholar 

  3. B Moran R Heald (2000) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leakage after colorectal anastomosis Semin Surg Oncol 18 244–248

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y Sakai H Nelson D Larson L Maidl T Young-Fadok D Ilstrup (2001) ArticleTitleTemporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion Arch Surg 136 338–342

    Google Scholar 

  5. DP Edwards A Leppington-Clarke R Sexton RJ Heald BJ Moran (2001) ArticleTitleStoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy Br J Surg 88 360–363

    Google Scholar 

  6. SN Amin MA Memon NC Armitage JH Scholefield (2001) ArticleTitleDefunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83 246–249

    Google Scholar 

  7. H Hasegawa S Radley DG Morton MR Keighley (2000) ArticleTitleStapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy Ann Surg 231 202–204

    Google Scholar 

  8. E Rullier N Le Toux C Laurent JL Garrelon M Parneix J Saric (2001) ArticleTitleLoop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery World J Surg 25 274–278

    Google Scholar 

  9. JA Grabham BJ Moran RH Lane (1995) ArticleTitleDefunctioning colostomy for low anterior resection Br J Surg 82 1331–1332

    Google Scholar 

  10. K Gullberg L Liljeqvist (2001) ArticleTitleStapled ileoanal pouches without loop ileostomy Int J Colorectal Dis 16 221–227

    Google Scholar 

  11. TL Hull I Kobe VW Fazio (1996) ArticleTitleComparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures Dis Colon Rectum 39 1086–1089

    Google Scholar 

  12. DP Edwards EM Chisholm DR Donaldson (1998) ArticleTitleClosure of transverse loop colostomy and loop ileostomy Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80 33–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kalady, M.F., Fields, R.C., Klein, S. et al. Loop Ileostomy Closure at an Ambulatory Surgery Facility. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 486–490 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6587-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6587-0

Keywords

Navigation