Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Lavage Timing on Tumor Cell Burden During Colonic Resection

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A subset of patients undergoing elective resection for an intra-abdominal malignancy may have viable tumor cells present within the peritoneal cavity at the start of the procedure. The presence of these cells may alter the pattern of tumor recurrence. METHODS: Six million human colorectal tumor cells were radiolabeled and injected into the pelvis of eight pigs before the undertaking of a standardized laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy. In four pigs, a 1-liter saline lavage was performed before resection, and in the four remaining pigs, a similar lavage was performed after construction of the anastomosis. After completion of the sigmoid colectomy, pigs were killed, and the anastomosis was excised. Counting the radioactivity present on each sample and correlating this with the radioactivity present within the initial cell inoculum enabled the number of cells on each anastomosis to be calculated. Additional measurements were made of the number of cells on the resected bowel specimen, the stapling device, the resected anastomotic donuts, the trocars and abdominal wounds, and the lavage fluid. RESULTS: Significantly fewer cells were detected on the anastomosis, the resected bowel specimen, and the donut of resected tissue in the pigs that received a preresection lavage (P = 0.01). Significantly greater numbers of cells were retrieved in the lavage fluid in this group (P = 0.01). No differences were detected in the number of cells that contaminated the stapling device (P = 0.1), trocars (P = 0.47), or trocar sites (P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: The simple strategy of lavage at the commencement of resection for an intra-abdominal resection may reduce contamination of the anastomosis and effect a reduction of the total number of viable cells present within the abdominal cavity in patients with free intra-abdominal tumor cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JC Goligher CE Dukes HJ Bussey (1951) ArticleTitleLocal recurrences after sphincter-saving excisions for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid Br J Surg 39 199

    Google Scholar 

  2. HC Umpleby B Fermor MO Symes RC Williamson (1984) ArticleTitleViability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells Br J Surg 71 659–663

    Google Scholar 

  3. A Tsunoda M Shibusawa Y Tsunoda G Kamiyama K Yamazaki M Kusano (1999) ArticleTitleEffect of povidone-iodine on anastomotic tumor growth in an experimental model of colorectal cancer surgery Anticancer Res 19 1149–1152

    Google Scholar 

  4. JG Docherty JR McGregor CA Purdie DJ Galloway PJ O’Dwyer (1995) ArticleTitleEfficacy of tumoricidal agents in vitro and in vivo Br J Surg 82 1050–1052

    Google Scholar 

  5. K Hase H Ueno N Kuranaga K Utsunomiya S Kanabe H Mochizuki (1998) ArticleTitleIntraperitoneal exfoliated cancer cells in patients with colorectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 41 1134–1140

    Google Scholar 

  6. NS Ambrose F MacDonald J Young H Thompson MR Keighley (1989) ArticleTitleMonoclonal antibody and cytological detection of free malignant cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer—can monoclonal antibodies do better? Eur J Surg Oncol 15 99–102

    Google Scholar 

  7. H Juhl (1994) ArticleTitleImmunocytological detection of micro-metastatic cells Int J Cancer 57 330–335

    Google Scholar 

  8. D Skipper MJ Jeffrey AJ Cooper P Alexander I Taylor (1989) ArticleTitleEnhanced growth of tumour cells in healing colonic anastomoses and laparotomy wounds Int J Colorectal Dis 4 172–177

    Google Scholar 

  9. HC Umpleby RC Williamson (1984) ArticleTitleThe efficacy of agents employed to prevent anastomotic recurrence in colorectal carcinoma Ann R Coll Surg Engl 66 192–194

    Google Scholar 

  10. RA Allardyce P Morreau PF Bagshaw (1997) ArticleTitleOperative factors affecting tumor cell distribution following laparoscopic colectomy in a porcine model Dis Colon Rectum 40 939–945

    Google Scholar 

  11. G Pandos S Penglis C Tsopelas (1999) ArticleTitleValidation of a column method for technetium-99m exametazime quality control J Nucl Med Technol 27 306–308

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y Iitska S Kaneshima O Tanida T Takeuchi S Koga (1979) ArticleTitleIntraperitoneal free cancer cells and their viability in gastric cancer Cancer 44 1476–1480

    Google Scholar 

  13. JC Hung S Chowdhury DW Mahoney BP Mullan (1998) ArticleTitleRadiolabelled mixed leukocytes and pure granulocytes with stabilized 99Tcm-exametazime Nucl Med Commun 19 981–987

    Google Scholar 

  14. JC Hung S Chowdhury BP Mullan (1998) ArticleTitleUse of stabilized technetium-99m-exametazime for radiolabeling leukocytes J Nucl Med 39 912–917

    Google Scholar 

  15. E Hansen N Wolff R Knuechel J Ruschoff F Hofstaedter K Taeger (1995) ArticleTitleTumor cells in blood shed from the surgical field Arch Surg 130 387–393

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Brundell, S., Tucker, K., Chatterton, B. et al. Influence of Lavage Timing on Tumor Cell Burden During Colonic Resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 460–466 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6583-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6583-4

Keywords

Navigation