Abstract
PURPOSE: Emergency surgery for colon cancer is widely thought to be associated with increased likelihood of surgical morbidity and mortality; however, other coexistent factors such as advanced disease, the age of the patient, and medical comorbid conditions may also influence these outcomes. The primary purpose of this study was to identify the relative risk for surgical morbidity and/or mortality conferred by emergency surgery compared with elective surgery for patients with colon cancer. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved, case-control study was performed. During the period from January 1, 1995, to June 30, 2001, a total of 184 primary surgeries for colon cancer were performed. Emergency indications for surgery were defined as peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscess, or complete bowel obstruction at presentation (defined as emesis, distention on examination, and confirmatory plain radiograph films). By this definition, 29 patients (15.7 percent) met the criteria for inclusion. These patients were age and stage matched with 29 patients derived from the remaining 155 patients. Information was collected on surgical morbidity and mortality, length of stay, and survival. RESULTS: Age, medical comorbidities, and stage of disease were well matched between groups. The indications for the 29 emergency surgeries were as follows: 6 for peritonitis, 2 for abscesses, and 21 for complete obstructions. Nine patients did not have their primary tumor removed. Sixteen patients underwent resection and anastomosis; the remaining four patients underwent a Hartmann’s procedure. Overall surgical morbidity (64 vs. 24 percent; odds ratio, 5.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7–16) and mortality (34 vs. 7 percent; odds ratio, 7.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.4–36.2) were significantly higher for patients undergoing emergency surgery. Among patients surviving surgery, there was no difference in overall survival between patients undergoing emergency compared with elective operation. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency surgery has a strong negative influence (beyond that which is expected based on stage of disease) on immediate surgical morbidity and mortality. The similarity between the two groups in overall survival for patients surviving the perioperative period suggests that the negative impact of emergency surgery is confined to the immediate postoperative period.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
IM Leitman JD Sullivan D Brams JJ DeCosse (1992) ArticleTitleMultivariate analysis of morbidity and mortality from the initial surgical management of obstructing carcinoma of the colon Surg Gynecol Obstet 174 513–518
S Khan SE Pawlak JC Eggenberger CS Lee EJ Szilagy DA Margolin (2001) ArticleTitleAcute colonic perforation associated with colorectal cancer Am Surg 67 261–264
HS Chen SM Sheen-Chen (2000) ArticleTitleObstruction and perforation in colorectal adenocarcinoma Surgery 127 370–376
PG Setti Carraro M Segala BM Cesana G Tiberio (2001) ArticleTitleObstructing colonic cancer Dis Colon Rectum 44 243–250
J Mella A Biffin AG Radcliffe JD Stamatakis RJ Steele (1997) ArticleTitlePopulation-based audit of colorectal cancer management in two UK health regions. Colorectal Cancer Working Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England Clinical Epidemiology and Audit Unit Br J Surg 84 1731–1736
S Repse M Calic B Zakelj Z Stor R Juvan F Jelenc (1996) ArticleTitleEmergency colorectal surgery Ann Ital Chir 67 205–209
M Massa G Corradini R Bucchianeri F Xiume R Scibe (1995) ArticleTitleEmergency surgical treatment in cancer of the colon Ann Ital Chir 66 467–471
I Arveux MC Boutron T El Mrini et al. (1997) ArticleTitleColon cancer in the elderly Br J Cancer 76 963–967
RD Kingston J Jeacock S Walsh F Keeling (1995) ArticleTitleThe outcome of surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly Eur J Surg Oncol 21 514–516
. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2000) ArticleTitleSurgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients Lancet 16 968–974
JJ Dignam L Colangelo W Tian et al. (1999) ArticleTitleOutcomes among African-Americans and Caucasians in colon cancer adjuvant therapy trials J Natl Cancer Inst 91 1933–1940
CC Boring TS Squires CW Heath SuffixJr (1992) ArticleTitleCancer statistics for African Americans CA Cancer J Clin 42 7–17
N Desoubeaux C Herbert G Launoy J Maurel M Gignoux (1997) ArticleTitleSocial environment and prognosis of colorectal cancer patients Int J Cancer 73 317–322
DR Risser (1996) ArticleTitleCancer incidence and mortality in urban versus rural areas of Texas, 1980 through 1985 Tex Med 92 58–61
NC Campbell AM Elliott L Sharp LD Ritchie J Cassidy J Little (2001) ArticleTitleRural and urban differences in stage at diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancers Br J Cancer 84 910–914
P Gervaz H Bouzourene JP Cerottini et al. (2001) ArticleTitleDukes B colorectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 44 364–372
YM Lee WL Law KW Chu RT Poon (2001) ArticleTitleEmergency surgery for obstructing colorectal cancers J Am Coll Surg 192 719–725
JE Payne HJ Meyer (1997) ArticleTitleIndependently predictive prognostic variables after resection for colorectal carcinoma Aust N Z J Surg 67 849–853
DC Hodgson CS Fuchs JZ Ayanian (2001) ArticleTitleImpact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 93 501–515
T Koperna M Kisser F Schulz (1997) ArticleTitleEmergency surgery for colon cancer in the aged Arch Surg 132 1032–1037
WE Longo KS Virgo FE Johnson et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRisk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer Dis Colon Rectum 43 83–91
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Smothers, L., Hynan, L., Fleming, J. et al. Emergency Surgery for Colon Carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 24–30 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6492-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6492-6