Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Objective Comparison of Stapled Anopexy and Open Hemorrhoidectomy

A Randomized, Controlled Trial

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This trial compares stapled anopexy with open hemorrhoidectomy in patients with prolapsing (Grade 3) hemorrhoids. Particular attention was paid to changes in anorectal physiology, nature of tissue resected, quality-of-life assessments, and cost implications of the treatments studied. METHODS: An initial pilot study was followed by a randomized, controlled trial in a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom. All patients had Grade 3 hemorrhoids. Nineteen patients were studied in the pilot study, with 99 patients in the randomized, controlled trial. All patients in the pilot study and 59 in the randomized, controlled trial underwent stapled anopexy. Thirty patients in the randomized, controlled trial underwent open hemorrhoidectomy. Of the 59 patients in the stapled group, 32 were treated with the Ethicon PPH™ stapling device, and 27 received stapling with a reusable Autosuture™ stapling device. The following variables were measured: demographic details, quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 and directed questions), anorectal manometry, and histology. RESULTS: There was no difference in the case mix within or between the groups. The stapled anopexy groups showed a significant reduction in operative time (P < 0.001) and blood loss (P < 0.001) compared with open hemorrhoidectomy. Open hemorrhoidectomy resulted in significantly greater usage of protective pads postoperatively (P < 0.001) and longer rehabilitation (P < 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Stapled anopexy is an effective alternative treatment for prolapsing hemorrhoids that allows reduced operative time and shorter rehabilitation. It does not appear to affect continence or overall quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E Milligan C Morgan L Jones R Officer (1937) ArticleTitleSurgical anatomy of the anal canal and operative treatment of haemorrhoids Lancet 2 1119–1124 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)88465-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E Carapeti M Kamm P McDonald R Phillips (1998) ArticleTitleDouble-blind randomised controlled trial of effect of metronidazole on pain after day-case haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 351 169–172 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXoslanug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9449871

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M Pescatori U Favetta S Dedola S Orsini (1997) ArticleTitleTransanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse Tech Coloproctol 1 96–98

    Google Scholar 

  4. DF Altomare M Rinaldi C Chiumarulo N Palasciano (1999) ArticleTitleTreatment of external anorectal mucosal prolapse with a circular stapler Dis Colon Rectum 42 1102–1105

    Google Scholar 

  5. M Rowsell M Bello D Hemingway (2000) ArticleTitleCircumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 779–781 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06122-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSrug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10711924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. B Mehigan J Monson J Hartley (2000) ArticleTitleStapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 782–785 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08362-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10711925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. G Beattie J Lam M Loudon (2000) ArticleTitleA prospective evaluation of the introduction of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse Colorectal Dis 2 137–142 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2000.00125.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V Fazio (2000) ArticleTitleEarly promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 768–769 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)00086-6 Occurrence Handle10711919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. InstitutionalAuthorNameEditor (2000) ArticleTitleStapled haemorrhoidectomy [editorial] Colorectal Dis 2 125–769

    Google Scholar 

  10. KI Deen D Kumar JG Williams EA Grant MR Keighley (1995) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of internal anal sphincter plication with pelvic floor repair for neuropathic fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 38 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  11. SA Pilkington AC Bateman S Wombwell R Miller (2000) ArticleTitleAnatomical basis for impotence following haemorrhoid sclerotherapy Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82 303–306

    Google Scholar 

  12. MJ Cheetham NJ Mortensen PO Nystrom MA Kamm RK Phillips (2000) ArticleTitlePersistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy Lancet 356 730–733 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02632-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjvVKquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11085693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, M.S., Pope, V., Doran, H.E. et al. Objective Comparison of Stapled Anopexy and Open Hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 1437–1444 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6446-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6446-z

Keywords

Navigation