Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Neorectal Reservoir Is Not the Functional Principle of the Colonic J-Pouch

The Volume of a Short Colonic J-Pouch Does Not Differ From a Straight Coloanal Anastomosis

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis prevents a definitive stoma in patients with distal rectal cancer. However, imperative stool urge, stool fragmentation, prolonged stooling sessions, and minor problems of incontinence are frequently observed in the postoperative situation and negatively affect quality of life. Therefore, the colonic J-pouch was originally constructed to create a stool reservoir. In a randomized, prospective study, the short (5 cm) colonic J-pouch was tested for function and continence vs. straight coloanal anastomosis. METHODS: Over a period of 30 months, 74 consecutive patients (55 males) with rectal cancer in the lower and middle third of the rectum were included and randomized into two groups. Anastomosis was performed either as a coloanal or a colon-pouch-anal anastomosis. The standardized surgical procedure included mobilization of the left hemicolon, central ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery and vein, preaortal lymph node dissection, autonomic nerve preservation, and total mesorectal excision. The anastomosis was performed at the upper anal canal or at the intersphincteric level. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and six months postoperatively for fecal continence, including sphincter manometry and defecation habits. In addition, quality of life was determined by use of a standardized questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, EORTC-QLQ-C30). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were randomized into each group. In general, problems with continence for liquids or gas occurred less frequently in the colonic J-pouch group 6 months after surgery. The frequency of bowel movements was lower in the J-pouch group (2.5 per day) than in the coloanal group (4.7 per day). Importantly, in a manometric study at the same postoperative point, neorectal capacity was decreased to a similar degree in both groups compared with the preoperative rectal volume. Thus, the expected and postulated reservoir effect could not be achieved by forming a 5-cm colonic J-pouch. CONCLUSION: The colonic J-pouch was superior with regard to continence for gas and liquids compared with a straight coloanal anastomosis. Furthermore, stool frequency was significantly lower in the J-pouch group than in the coloanal reconstruction group. However, because neorectal capacity decreased equally in both groups, we speculate that the advantage of the colonic J-pouch is not in the creation of a larger neorectal reservoir but rather may be related to decreased motility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WE Miles (1908) ArticleTitleA method of abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon Lancet 2 1812–1813

    Google Scholar 

  2. WE Miles (1910) ArticleTitleThe radical abdomino-perineal operation for cancer of the rectum and of the pelvic colon BMJ 2 941–942

    Google Scholar 

  3. CE Dukes (1930) ArticleTitleThe spread of cancer of the rectum Br J Surg 17 643–648

    Google Scholar 

  4. CE Dukes (1943) ArticleTitleThe surgical pathology of rectal cancer Proc R Soc Med 37 131–144

    Google Scholar 

  5. H Westhues (1930) ArticleTitleÜber die Entstehung und Vermeidung des lokalen Rektumkarzinom-Rezidivs Arch Klin Chir 161 582–591

    Google Scholar 

  7. JC Goligher CE Dukes HJ Bussey (1951) ArticleTitleLocal recurrences after sphincter-saving excisions for carcinomas of the rectum and rectosigmoid Br J Surg 39 199–211

    Google Scholar 

  8. AG Parks (1972) ArticleTitleTransanal technique in low rectal anastomosis Proc R Soc Med 65 975–976

    Google Scholar 

  9. JC Goligher (1979) ArticleTitleRecent trends in the practice of sphincter-saving excision for carcinoma of the rectum Adv Surg 13 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  10. WG Pollett RJ Nicholls (1983) ArticleTitleThe relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum Ann Surg 198 159–163

    Google Scholar 

  11. NS Williams D Johnston (1984) ArticleTitleSurvival and recurrence after sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum Br J Surg 71 278–282

    Google Scholar 

  12. NS Williams (1984) ArticleTitleThe rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancer Br J Surg 71 575–581

    Google Scholar 

  13. K Shirouzu H Isomoto T Kakegawa (1995) ArticleTitleDistal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter-preserving surgery Cancer 76 388–392

    Google Scholar 

  14. SN Fain S Patin L Morganstern (1975) ArticleTitleUse of mechanical apparatus in low colo-rectal anastomosis Arch Surg 110 1079–1082

    Google Scholar 

  15. P Quirke P Durdey MF Dixon NS Williams (1986) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection Lancet 2 996–999

    Google Scholar 

  16. RJ Heald (1988) ArticleTitleThe “holy plane” of rectal surgery J R Soc Med 81 503–508

    Google Scholar 

  17. JK MacFarlane RD Ryall RJ Heald (1993) ArticleTitleMesorectal excision for rectal cancer Lancet 341 457–460

    Google Scholar 

  18. RG Molloy KT Moran J Coulter R Waldron WO Kirwan (1992) ArticleTitleMechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection Dis Colon Rectum 35 462–464

    Google Scholar 

  19. K Havenga MC DeRuiter WE Enker K Welvaart (1996) ArticleTitleAnatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Br J Surg 83 384–388

    Google Scholar 

  20. IK Pedersen K Huit J Christiansen J Olsen P Jensen PE Mortensen (1986) ArticleTitleAnorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma Ann Surg 204 133–135

    Google Scholar 

  21. PJ McDonald RJ Heald (1983) ArticleTitleA survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices Br J Surg 70 727–729

    Google Scholar 

  22. WG Lewis IG Martin ME Williamson et al. (1995) ArticleTitleWhy do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 38 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  23. S Miller WG Lewis ME Williamson PJ Holdsworth D Johnston PJ Finan (1995) ArticleTitleFactors that influence the outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 82 1327–1330

    Google Scholar 

  24. EC Jehle T Haehnel MJ Starlinger HD Becker (1995) ArticleTitleLevel of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior resection for rectal cancer Am J Surg 169 147–153

    Google Scholar 

  25. F Lazorthes P Fages P Chiotasso J Lemozy E Bloom (1986) ArticleTitleResection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 73 136–138

    Google Scholar 

  26. R Parc E Tiret P Frileux E Moszkowski J Loygue (1986) ArticleTitleResection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma Br J Surg 73 139–141

    Google Scholar 

  27. J Hida M Yasutomi K Fujimoto et al. (1996) ArticleTitleFunctional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch Dis Colon Rectum 39 986–991

    Google Scholar 

  28. F Lazorthes R Gamagami P Chiotasso G Istvan S Muhammad (1997) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 40 1409–1413

    Google Scholar 

  29. JS Joo JF Latulippe O Alabaz EG Weiss JJ Nogueras SD Wexner (1998) ArticleTitleLong-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch Dis Colon Rectum 41 740–746

    Google Scholar 

  30. NK Aaronson S Ahmedzai B Bergman et al. (1993) ArticleTitleThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 85 365–376

    Google Scholar 

  33. C Thomas F Madden D Jehu (1984) ArticleTitlePsychosocial morbidity in the first three months following stoma surgery J Psychosom Res 28 251–257

    Google Scholar 

  34. C Thomas F Madden D Jehu (1987) ArticleTitlePsychosocial effects of stomas J Psychosom Res 31 311–316

    Google Scholar 

  35. O Hallböök U Hass A Wänström R Sjödahl (1997) ArticleTitleQuality of life measurement after rectal excision for cancer Scand J Gastroenterol 32 490–493

    Google Scholar 

  36. NR Krischke F Petermann (1995) ArticleTitleLebensqualität von Krebspatienten in der stationären Rehabilitation Prax Klin Verhaltensmed Rehabil 8 291–299

    Google Scholar 

  37. ME Williamson WG Lewis PJ Finan AS Miller PJ Holdsworth D Johnston (1995) ArticleTitleRecovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma Dis Colon Rectum 38 411–418

    Google Scholar 

  38. IC Otto K Ito C Ye et al. (1996) ArticleTitleCauses of rectal incontinence after sphincter-preserving operations for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 39 1423–1427

    Google Scholar 

  39. AG Parks RJ Nicholls P Belliveau (1980) ArticleTitleProctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and anal anastomosis Br J Surg 67 533–538

    Google Scholar 

  40. J Utsunomiya T Iwama M Imajo et al. (1980) ArticleTitleTotal colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 23 459–466

    Google Scholar 

  41. RJ Nicholls DZ Lubowski DR Donaldson (1988) ArticleTitleComparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision Br J Surg 75 318–320

    Google Scholar 

  42. M Kusunoki Y Shoji H Yanagi et al. (1991) ArticleTitleFunction after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic pouch-anal anastomosis Br J Surg 78 1434–1438

    Google Scholar 

  43. NJ Mortensen JM Ramirez N Takeuchi MM Smilgin Humphreys (1995) ArticleTitleColonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma Br J Surg 82 611–613

    Google Scholar 

  44. YH Ho M Tan F Seow-Choen (1996) ArticleTitleProspective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection Br J Surg 83 978–980

    Google Scholar 

  45. A Berger E Tiret R Parc et al. (1992) ArticleTitleExcision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum World J Surg 16 470–477

    Google Scholar 

  46. F Guillemot J Leroy M Boniface et al. (1991) ArticleTitleFunctional assessment of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir and excision of the anal transition zone Dis Colon Rectum 34 967–972

    Google Scholar 

  47. EP Pélissier D Blum A Bachour JF Bosset (1992) ArticleTitleFunctional results of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir Dis Colon Rectum 35 843–846

    Google Scholar 

  48. AM Cohen (1993) ArticleTitleColon J-pouch rectal reconstruction after total or subtotal proctectomy World J Surg 17 267–270

    Google Scholar 

  49. H Ortiz M De Miguel P Armendáriz J Rodriguez C Chocarro (1995) ArticleTitleColoanal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 38 375–377

    Google Scholar 

  50. F Seow-Cheon HS Goh (1995) ArticleTitleProspective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction Br J Surg 82 608–610

    Google Scholar 

  51. O Hallböök L Pahlman M Krog SD Wexner R Sjödahl (1996) ArticleTitleRandomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection Ann Surg 224 58–65

    Google Scholar 

  52. JM Ramirez NJ Mortensen N Takeuchi MM Smilgin Humphreys (1996) ArticleTitleColonic J-pouch rectal reconstruction Dis Colon Rectum 39 1286–1288

    Google Scholar 

  53. J Romanos JF Stebbing MM Smilgin Humphreys N Takeuchi NJ Mortensen (1996) ArticleTitleAmbulatory manometric examination in patients with colonic J pouch and in normal controls Br J Surg 83 1744–1746

    Google Scholar 

  54. SB Chew DS Tindal J Colonic (1997) ArticleTitle-pouch as a neorectum Aust N Z J Surg 67 607–610

    Google Scholar 

  55. O Hallböök PO Nyström R Sjödahl (1997) ArticleTitlePhysiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer Dis Colon Rectum 40 332–338

    Google Scholar 

  56. F Lazorthes P Chiotasso RA Gamagami et al. (1997) ArticleTitleLate clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis Br J Surg 84 1449–1451

    Google Scholar 

  57. A Fürst K Burghofer M Babl-Weisbarth S Kümmel S Tange KW Jauch (1998) ArticleTitleFunktionelles Ergebnis und Lebensqualität nach coloanaler oder colonpouch-analer Anastomose Langenbecks Arch Suppl I Forumsband 84 621–624

    Google Scholar 

  58. U Hildebrandt W Lindemann D Kreißler-Haag G Feifel (1995) ArticleTitleDie intersphinctere Rectumresektion mit colosphincterem Pouch Chirurg 66 377–384

    Google Scholar 

  59. ER Dennett BR Parry (1999) ArticleTitleMisconceptions about the colonic J-pouch Dis Colon Rectum 42 804–811

    Google Scholar 

  60. JW Baker (1950) ArticleTitleLow end to side rectosigmoid anastomosis Arch Surg 61 143–145

    Google Scholar 

  61. FT Huber B Herter JR Siewert (1999) ArticleTitleColonic pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection Dis Colon Rectum 42 896–902

    Google Scholar 

  62. VW Fazio CR Mantyh TL Hull (2000) ArticleTitleColonic “coloplasty” Dis Colon Rectum 43 1448–1450

    Google Scholar 

  63. K Z’graggen CA Maurer D Mettler C Stoupis S Wildi MW Büchler (1999) ArticleTitleA novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch-anal anastomosis Surgery 125 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  64. K Z’graggen CA Maurer MW Büchler (1999) ArticleTitleTransverse coloplasty pouch Dig Surg 16 363–366

    Google Scholar 

  65. R Ruppert D Staimmer (1999) ArticleTitleColonic “coloplasty” pouch Coloproctology 21 232–366

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

    Authors
    1. Alois Fürst M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Karin Burghofer M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Lilli Hutzel M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Karl-Walter Jauch M.D.
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Fürst, A., Burghofer, K., Hutzel, L. et al. Neorectal Reservoir Is Not the Functional Principle of the Colonic J-Pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 660–667 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6264-3

    Download citation

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6264-3

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation