Abstract
PURPOSE: How to manage posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage, a rare but serious complication, effectively remains controversial. This study evaluated the effectiveness of using rectal irrigation as an initial treatment for posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage. METHODS: Among 4,880 patients on whom elective closed hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease was performed, 45 (0.9 percent) developed posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage. The 45 patients were divided into two groups based on the initial treatment in the stoma therapy room (n = 25) or in the operating room (n = 20). Patients in the stoma therapy room group were treated with rectal irrigation, whereas those in the operating room group were examined under anesthesia and the bleeding point (if any) was under-run using a suture. The two groups were then compared with respect to the cost-effectiveness of treatment, rehospitalization stay, and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: The two groups (stoma therapy room vs. operating room groups) were comparable with respect to the mean age of patients (44 vs. 38 years), interval of hemorrhage (9.4 vs. 7.8 days), and estimated amount of blood loss (560 vs. 520 ml). Bleeding effectively stopped in 22 (88 percent) patients in the stoma therapy room group but only in 12 (60 percent) patients in the operating room group (P = 0.010). The rehospitalization stay was three days in the stoma therapy room and 4.9 days in the operating room group (P = 0.016). In addition, the stoma therapy room group had a greater satisfaction rate than the operating room group did (80 vs. 10 percent, P < 0.001). Moreover, the average cost of treatment in the operating room group was six-fold higher than that in the stoma therapy room group. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that rectal irrigation is an effective initial treatment for posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage and offers a high rate of patient satisfaction with a reduced hospital cost.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R Bleday JP Pena DA Rothenberger SM Goldberg JG Buls (1992) ArticleTitleSymptomatic hemorrhoids Dis Colon Rectum 35 477–481
AG Parks (1971) ArticleTitleHemorrhoidectomy Adv Surg 5 1–50
NJ Kilbourne (1934) ArticleTitleInternal haemorrhoids Ann Surg 99 600–608
JA Ferguson WP Mazier MI Ganchrow WG Friend (1971) ArticleTitleThe closed technique of hemorrhoidectomy Surgery 70 480–484
IT Khubchandani HD Trimpi JA Sheets (1974) ArticleTitleEvaluation of polyglycolic acid suture vs. catgut in closed hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia South Med J 67 1504–1506
LI Bautista (1977) ArticleTitleSymposium. Hemorrhoidectomy—how I do it: complications of closed hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 20 183–185
KW Eu F Seow-Choen HS Goh (1994) ArticleTitleComparison of emergency and elective hemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 81 308–310
WF Burrows EC Burrows (1922) ArticleTitleRectal packing JAMA 78 1293–1294
GL Walker ND Nigro (1959) ArticleTitlePostoperative anorectal hemorrhage Surg Clin North Am 39 1655–1660
WB Gabriel (1920) ArticleTitleHaemorrhage following the operative treatment of internal hemorrhoids, with particular reference to severe secondary hemorrhage Lancet 2 121–122
L Rosen P Sipe JJ Stasik RD Riether HD Trimpi (1993) ArticleTitleOutcome of delayed hemorrhage following surgical hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 36 743–746
PW Mazier AE Wolkomir (1990) ArticleTitleHemorrhoids Semin Colon Rectal Surg 1 197–206
HH Chen CY Yeh R Tang ChienCR Chang JY Wang (1999) ArticleTitleA method to control delayed posthemorrhoidectomy hemorrhage [in Chinese] J Soc Colon Rectal Surg Taiwan 10 47–51
FE Farrer (1961) ArticleTitleDelayed postoperative anorectal hemorrhage Dis Colon Rectum 4 50–55
L Basso M Pescatori (1994) ArticleTitleOutcome of delayed hemorrhage following surgical hemorrhoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 37 288–289
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, H.H., Wang, JY., Changchien, C.R. et al. Effective Management of Posthemorrhoidectomy Secondary Hemorrhage Using Rectal Irrigation. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 234–238 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6154-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6154-8