Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pouch-Vaginal Fistula After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Treatment and Outcomes

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

Pouch-vaginal fistula is an uncommon but serious complication after ileal pouch anal anastomosis. The management of pouch-vaginal fistulas is challenging and a number of treatment options exist. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes after various procedures for pouch-vaginal fistula performed at our institution.

METHODS

Patients who were treated for pouch-vaginal fistula at Mount Sinai Hospital were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Demographic, disease history, treatment, and outcomes data were obtained. Treatment success was defined as no recurrence of the fistula with a functioning pouch and no ileostomy.

RESULTS

Since November 1982, 24 of 619 (3.9 percent) women who had primary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed at Mount Sinai Hospital developed a pouch-vaginal fistula. Five women had ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed at another institution and were referred for management of their pouch-vaginal fistula. Local and/or combined abdominoperineal repairs were performed in 22 of 29 patients. Combined abdominoperineal repairs were associated with a higher success rate than that of local perineal repairs (52.9 vs. 7.9 percent, respectively, at 10 years after repair; p = 0.035). Overall, 50 percent (11/22) of patients who underwent surgical repair of a pouch-vaginal fistula had a successful result with a functioning pouch and no recurrence of the fistula, and 21 percent (6/29) of patients required pouch excision.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of pouch-vaginal fistula after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is associated with a high recurrence rate. Combined abdominoperineal repair appears to offer better results than those of local procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. NS Shah F Remzi A Massmann J Baixauli VW Fazio (2003) ArticleTitleManagement and treatment outcome of pouch-vaginal fistulas following restorative proctocolectomy Dis Colon Rectum 46 911–7 Occurrence Handle12847365

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. R Zinicola KH Wilkinson RJ Nicholls (2003) ArticleTitleIleal-pouch vaginal fistula treated by abdominal advancement of the ileal pouch Br J Surg 90 1434–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srmtVylug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle14598427

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. D Burke CJ Laarhoven Particlevan F Herbst RJ Nicholls (2001) ArticleTitleTransvaginal repair of pouch vaginal fistula Br J Surg 88 241–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7kt1Wisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11167874

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. SR Gorfine A Fichera MT Harris JJ Bauer (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term results of salvage surgery for septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy: does fecal diversion improve outcome Dis Colon Rectum 46 1339–44 Occurrence Handle14530672

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Z Cohen D Smith R McLeod (1998) ArticleTitleReconstructive surgery for pelvic pouches World J Surg 22 342–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7osVWitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9523514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. SD Wexner DA Rothenberger L Jensen et al. (1989) ArticleTitleIleal pouch vaginal fistulas: incidence, etiology and management Dis Colon Rectum 32 460–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BD3cvnsV0%3D Occurrence Handle2676425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. UA Heuschen U Hinz EH Allemeyer et al. (2002) ArticleTitleRisk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis Ann Surg 235 207–16 Occurrence Handle11807360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. PY Lee VW Fazio JM Church TL Hull K Eu IC Lavery (1997) ArticleTitleVaginal fistula following restorative proctocolectomy Dis Colon Rectum 40 752–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA28vovFw%3D Occurrence Handle9221847

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MR Keighley SP Grobler (1993) ArticleTitleFistula complicating restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 80 1065–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD3crlvV0%3D Occurrence Handle8402069

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. VW Fazio JJ Tjandra (1992) ArticleTitlePouch advancement and neo-ilealanal anastomosis for anastomotic stricture and anovaginal fistula complication restorative proctocolectomy Br J Surg 79 694–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A2MzotV0%3D Occurrence Handle1643488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. AR MacLean B O’Connor R Parkes Z Cohen RS McLeod (2002) ArticleTitleReconstructive surgery for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A viable surgical option with acceptable results Dis Colon Rectum 45 880–6 Occurrence Handle12130874

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. J Baixauuli CP Delaney JS Wu FH Remzi VW Fazio (2004) ArticleTitleFunctional outcome and quality of life after repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for complications of ileoanal surgery Dis Colon Rectum 47 2–11 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-003-0003-z Occurrence Handle14719144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, P., O’Connor, B., Cohen, Z. et al. Pouch-Vaginal Fistula After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Treatment and Outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 1249–1253 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0872-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0872-9

Key words

Navigation