Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Accurate is Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Restaging Rectal Cancer in Patients Receiving Preoperative Combined Chemoradiotherapy?

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

Preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy is currently the main neoadjuvant therapy used to treat locally advanced middle and low rectal adenocarcinoma. A restaging work-up with magnetic resonance imaging was hoped to provide information about the effects related to combined chemoradiotherapy. The goal was to evaluate the correlation between pathologically verified tumor stages and clinical stages predicted by magnetic resonance imaging after combined chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Between August 2000 and June 2003, 50 patients with biopsy-proven middle and lower rectal adenocarcinoma, with initial stage T3–T4 or N+, M0, were recruited in this series. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was used to stage the tumor before and after combined chemoradiotherapy. A protocol of the standard external radiation dose and oral combined uracil and 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin was used. The results of magnetic resonance imaging restaging after combined chemoradiotherapy were correlated with the pathologic staging.

RESULTS

The overall predictive accuracy in T stage was 52 percent, whereas overstaging and understaging occurred in 38 percent and 10 percent of patients, respectively. Most of the inaccurate T staging was a result of the overstaging of superficial tumors (T0–T2). In N stage, accurate staging was noted in 68 percent of all patients, whereas 24 percent were overstaged and 8 percent were understaged.

CONCLUSION

In restaging irradiated tumors, magnetic resonance imaging had the accuracy of 52 percent in T stage and 68 percent in N stage. Poor agreement between post–combined chemoradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic staging was observed in both T (k = 0.017) and N (k = 0.031) stages. Most of the inaccuracy in both T and N stages was caused by overstaging. The problem with magnetic resonance imaging was believed to be that it could not completely differentiate fibrosis from viable residual tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. HO Douglass SuffixJr CG Moertel RJ Mayer et al. (1986) ArticleTitleSurvival after postoperative combination treatment of rectal cancer N Engl J Med 315 1294–5 Occurrence Handle3773947 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM198611133152014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. JE Krook CG Moertel LL Gunderson et al. (1991) ArticleTitleEffective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma N Engl J Med 324 709–15 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M7kvVKmsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1997835 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199103143241101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. B Minsky (1994) ArticleTitlePreoperative combined modality treatment for rectal cancer Oncology (Huntingt) 8 53–61 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3ps12jtg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. JF Bosset V Magnin P Maingon et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer: long-term results of a phase II trial Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46 323–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00411-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7isV2mtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10661338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. CS Wong BJ Cummings TJ Keane W Dobrowsky B O’Sullivan CN Catton (1991) ArticleTitleCombined radiation therapy, mitomycin C, and 5-fluorouracil for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma: results of a pilot study Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21 1291–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FktFWhsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1938526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous (1997) ArticleTitleImproved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial N Engl J Med 336 980–7 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199704033361402 Occurrence Handle9091798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. NA Janjan J Abbruzzese R Pazdur et al. (1999) ArticleTitlePrognostic implications of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer Radiother Oncol 51 153–60 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00054-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzmt1Wrtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10435807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. P Rauch P Bey D Peiffert T Conroy L Bresler (2001) ArticleTitleFactors affecting local control and survival after treatment of carcinoma of the rectum by endocavitary radiation: a retrospective study of 97 cases Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49 117–24 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00749-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7nslCnsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11163504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. L Ruo S Tickoo DS Klimstra et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLong-term prognostic significance of extent of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy Ann Surg 236 75–81 Occurrence Handle12131088

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. G Theodoropoulos WE Wise A Padmanabhan et al. (2002) ArticleTitleT-level downstaging and complete pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiation for advanced rectal cancer result in decreased recurrence and improved disease-free survival Dis Colon Rectum 45 895–903 Occurrence Handle12130878

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. M Schaffer M Thoma R Wilkowski P Schaffer E Duhmke (2002) ArticleTitleRadio-chemotherapy as a preoperative treatment for advanced rectal cancer. Evaluation of down-staging and morbidity Onkologie 25 352–6 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000066053 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vntFaksQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12232487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. FA Calvo M Gomez-Espi JA Diaz-Gonzalez et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePathologic downstaging of T3-4Nx rectal cancer after chemoradiation: 5-fluorouracil vs. Tegafur Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51 1264–70 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01728-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnot1ynug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11728686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. C Berger A de Muret P Garaud et al. (1997) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer: predictive factors of tumor downstaging and residual tumor cell density (RTCD): prognostic implications Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37 619–27 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ms1Ogug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9112461

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Y Katsumoto N Maruyama M Nakamura et al. (2001) ArticleTitleDiagnosis of the postoperative local recurrence of rectal cancer by FDG-PET–a case report Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 28 1688–91 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnmt1Ohtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11708010

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. JJ Chung MJ Kim JT Lee HS Yoo (2000) ArticleTitleLarge villous adenoma in rectum mimicking cerebral hemispheres Am J Roentgenol 175 1465–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FisVygug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. G Brown AG Radcliffe RG Newcombe NS Dallimore MW Bourne GT Williams (2003) ArticleTitlePreoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging Br J Surg 90 355–64 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4034 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fot1Oiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12594673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. H Matsuoka A Nakamura T Masaki et al. (2003) ArticleTitleComparison between endorectal coil and pelvic phased-array coil magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anorectal tumor Am J Surg 185 328–32 Occurrence Handle12657384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. MH Fuchsjager AG Maier W Schima et al. (2003) ArticleTitleComparison of transrectal sonography and double-contrast MR imaging when staging rectal cancer Am J Roentgenol 181 421–7 Occurrence Handle12876020

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. H Kwok IP Bissett GL Hill (2000) ArticleTitlePreoperative staging of rectal cancer Int J Colorectal Dis 15 9–20 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3islWmsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10766086

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. A Maier M Fuchsjager (2003) ArticleTitlePreoperative staging of rectal cancer Eur J Radiol 47 89–97 Occurrence Handle12880989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. B Holzer M Urban N Holbling et al. (2003) ArticleTitleMagnetic resonance imaging predicts sphincter invasion of low rectal cancer and influences selection of operation Surgery 133 656–61 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2003.150 Occurrence Handle12796734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. A Martling T Holm S Bremmer J Lindholm B Cedermark L Blomqvist (2003) ArticleTitlePrognostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in rectal cancer Br J Surg 90 1422–8 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4276 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srhvV2qtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle14598425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. KT Hoffmann B Rau P Wust et al. (2002) ArticleTitleRestaging of locally advanced carcinoma of the rectum with MR imaging after preoperative radio-chemotherapy plus regional hyperthermia Strahlenther Onkol 178 386–92 Occurrence Handle12163993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. FL Greene DL Page ID Fleming et al. (2002) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual EditionNumber6th ed. Springer Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  25. M Indinnimeo RF Grasso C Cicchini et al. (1996) ArticleTitleEndorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of rectal tumors Int Surg 81 419–22 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ntlegsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9127810

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. L Blomqvist M Machado C Rubio et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRectal tumour staging: MR imaging using pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils vs endoscopic ultrasonography Eur Radiol 10 653–60 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3lsVGltQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10795550

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. G Brown S Davies GT Williams et al. (2004) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging? Br J Cancer 91 23–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czitlOruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15188013

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. AG Maier PP Barton NR Neuhold F Herbst BK Teleky GL Lechner (1997) ArticleTitlePeritumoral tissue reaction at transrectal US as a possible cause of overstaging in rectal cancer: histopathologic correlation Radiology 203 785–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szhtlWjsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9169705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. A Habr-Gama PM de Souza U Ribeiro SuffixJr et al. (1998) ArticleTitleLow rectal cancer: impact of radiation and chemotherapy on surgical treatment Dis Colon Rectum 41 1087–96 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvhvF2hsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9749491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. DC Allen LJ Fon JJ McAleer ST Irwin (1999) ArticleTitlePathology of rectal adenocarcinoma following preoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy Ulster Med J 68 17–21 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvhvFKmsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10489807

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. A Horn I Morild O Dahl (1990) ArticleTitleTumour shrinkage and down staging after preoperative radiation of rectal adenocarcinomas Radiother Oncol 18 19–28 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c3psFKhtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2193318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. M Gavioli A Bagni I Piccagli S Fundaro G Natalini (2000) ArticleTitleUsefulness of endorectal ultrasound after preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer: comparison between sonographic and histopathologic changes Dis Colon Rectum 43 1075–83 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvitVSgsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10950005

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. P Torricelli A Pecchi G Luppi R Romagnoli (2003) ArticleTitleGadolinium-enhanced MRI with dynamic evaluation in diagnosing the local recurrence of rectal cancer Abdom Imaging 28 19–27 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00261-001-0127-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jitFCgsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12483379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. C Kremser W Judmaier P Hein J Griebel P Lukas A Vries de (2003) ArticleTitlePreliminary results on the influence of chemoradiation on apparent diffusion coefficients of primary rectal carcinoma measured by magnetic resonance imaging Strahlenther Onkol 179 641–9 Occurrence Handle14628131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. PA Hein C Kremser W Judmaier et al. (2003) ArticleTitleDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring diffusion changes in rectal carcinoma during combined, preoperative chemoradiation: preliminary results of a prospective study Eur J Radiol 45 214–22 Occurrence Handle12595106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. C Schiepers K Haustermans K Geboes L Filez G Bormans F Penninckx (1999) ArticleTitleThe effect of preoperative radiation therapy on glucose utilization and cell kinetics in patients with primary rectal carcinoma Cancer 85 803–11 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXhtlygsLk%3D Occurrence Handle10091757

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shung-Haur Yang M.D..

Additional information

Supported by a grant (92-78) from Taipei Veterans General Hospital.

Reprint requests to: Chien-Chih Chen, M.D., Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, No. 125 Li-Der Road, Taipei, Taiwan, e-mail: peter70@seed.net.tw.

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, CC., Lee, RC., Lin, JK. et al. How Accurate is Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Restaging Rectal Cancer in Patients Receiving Preoperative Combined Chemoradiotherapy?. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 722–728 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0851-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0851-1

Key words

Navigation