Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic or Transanal Repair of Rectocele? A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to analyze the functional and physiologic outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic rectocele repair compared to a matched cohort undergoing transanal repair.

METHODS

Forty patients with a rectocele who had undergone laparoscopic pelvic floor repair by a laparoscopic gynecologist were matched for age and rectocele size with 40 patients who had undergone a transanal repair by a colorectal surgeon. All patients had clinical evidence of a symptomatic rectocele. All patients were assessed postoperatively with a quality of life (SF-36) score, a modified St. Mark’s continence score, a urinary dysfunction score, a Watt’s sexual dysfunction score, and a linear analog patient satisfaction score. Fifteen patients in each group had also undergone preoperative and postoperative anal manometry.

RESULTS

At 44 months median follow-up, the transanal approach resulted in significantly more patients reporting bowel symptom alleviation (P < 0.002) and higher patient satisfaction (P < 0.003). The bowel symptom improvement was also sustained over a significantly longer period (P < 0.03). Only 11 patients (28 percent) in the laparoscopic group reported more than 50 percent improvement in their bowel symptoms compared to 25 patients (63 percent) in the transanal group. On univariate analysis of 50 percent bowel symptom improvement, a larger rectocele (P < 0.009), transanal repair (P < 0.02), and presenting with obstructive defecation rather than fecal incontinence (P < 0.03) were statistically significant. Rectocele size (P < 0.012) and treatment cohort (P < 0.006) remained significant on multivariate analysis. Postoperatively, bowel symptom alleviation correlated with patient satisfaction in both groups (P < 0.015). Although not statistically significant, five patients (13 percent) in the transanal group developed postoperative fecal incontinence, which was associated with a low maximum anal resting pressure preoperatively that was further diminished postoperatively (P > 0.06). Only one patient (3 percent) in the laparoscopic group reported a decline in fecal continence, but four patients (10 percent) reported worsening of their symptoms of obstructed defecation. Postoperative dyspareunia was reported by 24 patients in total (30 percent), with significantly more in the transanal group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The transanal repair results in a statistically greater alleviation of bowel symptoms and greater patient satisfaction scores. However, this approach may have a greater degree of functional co-morbidity than the laparoscopic rectocele repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. JT Goh JJ Tjandra MP Carey (2002) ArticleTitleHow could management of rectoceles be optimised? ANZ J Surg 72 896–901 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.t01-1-02577.x Occurrence Handle12485230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. SJ Watson PB Loder S Halligan CI Bartram MA Kamm RK Phillips (1996) ArticleTitleTransperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with Marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiologic assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg 183 257–61 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA2sfnsFM%3D Occurrence Handle8784320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. IT Khubchandani JA Sheets JJ Stasik AR Hakki (1983) ArticleTitleEndorectal repair of rectocele. . 26 792–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuD2MjhtV0%3D Occurrence Handle6641461

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. E Graul B Hurst (2001) ArticleTitleAn alternative approach to the repair of cystoceles and rectoceles. Obstet Gynecol 97(Suppl 1) S48 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01259-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. MA Kahn SL Stanton (1998) ArticleTitleTechniques of rectocele repair and their effects on bowel function. Int Urogynecol J 9 37–47 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czhvFamuw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. P Boccasanta M Venturi G Calabro et al. (2001) ArticleTitleWhich surgical approach for rectocele? A multicentric report from Italian coloproctologists. 5 149–56 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387jvVCrsQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. VK Murthy BA Orkin LE Smith LM Glassman (1996) ArticleTitleExcellent outcome using selective criteria for rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 39 374–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD3s3nsVA%3D Occurrence Handle8878494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. IT Khubchandani JP Clancy L Rosen RD Reither JJ Stasik (1997) ArticleTitleEndorectal repair of rectocele revisited. Br J Surg 84 89–91 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02463.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC1MnivVA%3D Occurrence Handle9043465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. JJ Tjandra BS Ooi CL Tang P Dwyer M Carey (1999) ArticleTitleTransanal repair of rectocele corrects obstructed defecation if it is not associated with anismus. Dis Colon Rectum 42 1544–50 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FnvVKgsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10613472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JJ Tjandra HW Sengupta O Dwyer M Carey (2001) ArticleTitleTransanal repair of rectocele: four years on. Dis Colon Rectum 44 A56

    Google Scholar 

  11. JH van Dam WM Huisman WC Hop WR Schouten (2000) ArticleTitleFecal continence after rectocele repair: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 15 54–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003840050008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3islWmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10766092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. S Sehapayak (1985) ArticleTitleTransrectal repair of rectocele: an extended armamentarium of colorectal surgeons report of 355 cases Dis Colon Rectum 28 422–33 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqB38bovVE%3D Occurrence Handle3891260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. K Singh E Cortes WM Reid (2003) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101 320–4 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02616-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fms1OmsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12576256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. WE Porter A Steele P Walsh N Kohli K Mickey (1999) ArticleTitleThe anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 18 1353–8

    Google Scholar 

  15. RA Steiner JC Healy (1998) ArticleTitlePatterns of prolapse in women with symptoms of pelvic floor weakness: magnetic resonance imaging and laparoscopic treatment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10 295–301 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czos1enuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9719880

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. MF Paraiso T Falcone MD Walters (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery for enterocele, vaginal apex prolapse and rectocele. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10 223–9 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001920050050 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MznvVSgsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10450821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. TL Lyons WK Winer (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic rectocele repair using polyglactin mesh. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4 381–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB1Mbps1A%3D Occurrence Handle9154790

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. ML Kennedy S Sowter H Nguyen DZ Lubowski (1999) ArticleTitleGlyceryl trinitrate ointment for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 42 1000–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzosFejsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10458121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. A Lam D Rosen (1997) ArticleTitleA new laparoscopic approach for enterocele repair. Gynecol Endosc 6 211–7

    Google Scholar 

  20. A Malouf C Norton A Engel RJ Nicholls MA Kamm (2000) ArticleTitleLong-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 355 260–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jslGgtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10675072

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. JE Ware CD Sherbourne (1992) ArticleTitleThe MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 30 473–83 Occurrence Handle1593914

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Watts RJ. Watts sexual function questionnaire—female form. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996

  23. PS Milley DH Nichols (1969) ArticleTitleA correlative investigation of the human rectovaginal septum. Anat Rec 163 443–52 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCaC3sjjvVI%3D Occurrence Handle5774728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. S Ayabaca A Zbar M Pescatori (2002) ArticleTitleAnal continence after rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 45 63–9 Occurrence Handle11786766

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. JH van Dam WC Hop WR Schouten (2000) ArticleTitleAnalysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 43 1556–60 Occurrence Handle11089592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. G Maria G Brisinda AR Bentivoglio A Albanese G Sganga M Castagneto (2001) ArticleTitleAnterior rectocele due to obstructed defecation relieved by botulinum toxin. Surgery 129 524–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzgvFGqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11331443

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. JH van Dam AZ Ginai MJ Gosselink et al. (1997) ArticleTitleRole of defecography in predicting clinical outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 40 201–7 Occurrence Handle9075758

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. CJ Van Laarhoven MA Kamm CI Bartram S Halligan PR Hawley RK Phillips (1999) ArticleTitleRelationship between anatomic and symptomatic long-term results after rectocele repair for impaired defecation Dis Colon Rectum 42 204–11 Occurrence Handle10211497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. MA Kamm (1994) ArticleTitleObstetric damage and fecal incontinence. Lancet 344 730–3 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92213-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA2MbjtFw%3D Occurrence Handle7915781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. CJ Vaisey MA Kamm CI Bartram (1997) ArticleTitlePrimary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive fecal incontinence. Lancet 349 612–5 Occurrence Handle9057734

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. S Kunskar EP Arnold K Burgio et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEpidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11 301–19 Occurrence Handle11052566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. RA Steiner JC Healy (1998) ArticleTitlePatterns of prolapse in women with symptoms of pelvic floor weakness: magnetic resonance imaging and laparoscopic treatment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10 295–301 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czos1enuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9719880

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. M Meschia A Bounaguidi P Pifarotti E Somigliana M Spennacchio F Amicarelli (2002) ArticleTitlePrevalence of anal incontinence in women with symptoms of urinary incontinence and genital prolapse Obstet Gynecol 100 719–23 Occurrence Handle12383540

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. AL Olsen VJ Smith JO Bergstrom JC Colling AL Clark (1997) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence Obstet Gynecol 89 501–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB3snmtVI%3D Occurrence Handle9083302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. ML Kennedy DZ Lubowski DW King (2002) ArticleTitleTransanal endoscopic microsurgery excision: is anorectal function compromised? Dis Colon Rectum 45 601–4 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6252-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383msVCnuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12004207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. C Johansson BY Nilsson B Holmstrom A Dolk A Melle-gren (1992) ArticleTitleAssociation between rectocele and paradoxical sphincter response Dis Colon Rectum 35 503–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3sznslQ%3D Occurrence Handle1568403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. JH van Dam WR Schouten AZ Ginai WM Huisman WC Hop (1996) ArticleTitleThe impact of anismus on the clinical outcome of rectocele repair Int J Colorectal Dis 11 238–42 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC3cbitlA%3D Occurrence Handle8951514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. HR Rosen C Ubarz G Novi G Zoch R Schiessel (2002) ArticleTitleLong-term of the modified graciloplasty for sphincter replacement after rectal excision Colorectal Dis 4 266–9 Occurrence Handle12780598

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. SD Wexner C Baeten R Bailey et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLong-term efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 45 809–18 Occurrence Handle12072635

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia

    M. J. Thornton F.R.A.C.S., L.L.B. & D. W. King F.R.A.C.S.

  2. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia

    A. Lam F.R.A.N.Z.C.O.G.

Authors
  1. M. J. Thornton F.R.A.C.S., L.L.B.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Lam F.R.A.N.Z.C.O.G.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. W. King F.R.A.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The work was supported by grants from The Harry Triguboff Research Scholarship, Sydney Colorectal Associates, Sydney, Australia.

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Thornton, M., Lam, A. & King, D. Laparoscopic or Transanal Repair of Rectocele? A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 792–798 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0843-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0843-1

Key words

Search

Navigation