Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis of Nodal Upstaging Between Colon and Rectal Cancers by Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: A Prospective Trial

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

Sentinel lymph node mapping accurately predicts nodal status in >90 percent of melanoma and breast and colorectal cancers. However, because of anatomic differences, sentinel lymph node mapping of rectal cancers has been considered inaccurate and difficult relative to colon. A prospective study was undertaken to identify differences in sentinel lymph node mapping between patients with colon cancer and those with rectal cancer.

METHODS

At operation 1 to 3 ml of 1 percent isosulfan blue dye was injected subserosally around colon cancers. The first to fourth blue-staining nodes seen within ten minutes of injection were marked as sentinel lymph nodes. For cancer of the mid-rectum to low rectum, the dye was injected submucosally via rigid scope and spinal needle. The mesorectum was dissected ex vivo to identify blue nodes nearest the tumor as sentinel lymph nodes. Multilevel microsections of sentinel lymph nodes were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunostained for cytokeratin, and standard examination of the entire specimen was performed.

RESULTS

There were 407 consecutive patients (336 with colon and 71 rectum). The sentinel lymph nodes were identified in 99.1 percent of colon and 91.5 percent of rectal patients (P < 0.0001). Skip metastases were found in 3.6 percent of colon vs. 2.8 percent of rectal patients (P = 0.16). Occult micrometastases were found in 13.4 percent of colon vs. 7.0 percent of rectal patients (P = 0.24). Except for success rates, no other parameters were statistically different between colon and rectum. Lower success in sentinel lymph node identification in rectal cancer may have been related to neoadjuvant chemoradiation received in all six of the patients with sentinel lymph node mapping failures.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher success rates in sentinel lymph node identification for colon patients, sentinel lymph node mapping was highly successful (91.5 percent) in rectal patients. Nodal upstaging, skip metastases, and occult metastases were similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. PH Chapuis OF Dent R Fisher et al. (1985) ArticleTitleA multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer Br J Surg 72 698–702 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimD3c7isVw%3D Occurrence Handle4041728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. G Lindmark B Gerdin L Pahlman R Bergstrom B Glimelius (1994) ArticleTitlePrognostic predictors in colorectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 37 1219–27 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD1cjks1E%3D Occurrence Handle7995147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. T Wiggers JW Arends B Schutte L Volovics FT Bosman (1988) ArticleTitleA multivariate analysis of pathologic prognostic indicators in large bowel cancer Cancer 61 386–95 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieD2sbptV0%3D Occurrence Handle3422035

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. AM Cohen D Kelsen L Saltz et al. (1997) ArticleTitleAdjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer Curr Probl Surg 34 601–76 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA1MrksVM%3D Occurrence Handle9251585

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. S Saha D Wiese J Badin et al. (2000) ArticleTitleTechnical details of sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer and its impact on staging Ann Surg Oncol 7 120–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3it1ChtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10761790

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. TF Wood GJ Tsioulias DL Morton et al. (2000) ArticleTitleFocused examination of sentinel lymph nodes upstages early colorectal carcinoma Am Surg 66 998–1003 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FmvVCntg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11090005

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DA Wiese S Saha J Badin et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma Arch Pathol Lab Med 124 1759–63 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpsVyqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11100053

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. AJ Bilchik S Saha D Wiese et al. (2001) ArticleTitleMolecular staging of early colon cancer on the basis of sentinel node analysis: a multicenter phase II trial J Clin Oncol 19 1128–36 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3gsFagtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11181678

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. GJ Tsioulias TF Wood DL Morton AJ Bilchik (2000) ArticleTitleLymphatic mapping and focused analysis of sentinel lymph nodes upstage gastrointestinal neoplasms Arch Surg 135 926–32 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.135.8.926 Occurrence Handle10922254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JH Wong S Steineman C Calderia J Bowles T Namiki (2001) ArticleTitleEx vivo sentinel node mapping in carcinoma of the colon and rectum Ann Surg 233 515–21 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200104000-00006 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3kvVajsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11303133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. TL Fitzgerald MA Khalifa M Zahrani ParticleAl CH Law AJ Smith (2002) ArticleTitleEx vivo sentinel lymph node biopsy in colorectal cancer: a feasibility study J Surg Oncol 80 27–32 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jso.10091 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383osVaqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11967903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. R Broll V Schauer H Schimmelpenning et al. (1997) ArticleTitlePrognostic relevance of occult tumor cells in lymph nodes of colorectal carcinomas: an immunohistochemical study Dis Colon Rectum 40 1465–71 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FmvFyktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9407986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. JK Greenson CE Isenhart R Rice C Mojzisik D Houchens EW Martin SuffixJr (1994) ArticleTitleIdentification of occult micrometastases in pericolic lymph nodes of Duke’s B colorectal cancer patients using monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratin and CC49. Correlation with long-term survival Cancer 73 563–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC3s%2Fit1I%3D Occurrence Handle7507795

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. N Isaka M Nozue M Doy K Fukao (1999) ArticleTitlePrognostic significance of perirectal lymph node micrometastases in Dukes’ B rectal carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study by CAM5.2 Clin Cancer Res 5 2065–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgtVSltA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10473087

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. RT Palma J Waisberg SH Bromberg AB Simao AC Godoy (2003) ArticleTitleMicrometastasis in regional lymph nodes of extirpated colorectal carcinoma: immunohistochemical study using anti-cytokeratin antibodies AE1/AE3 Colorectal Dis 5 164–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3ls1Grtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12780907

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. G Adell B Boeryd B Franlund R Sjodahl L Hakansson (1996) ArticleTitleOccurrence and prognostic importance of micrometastases in regional lymph nodes in Dukes’ B colorectal carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study Eur J Surg 162 637–42 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2cnntVU%3D Occurrence Handle8891622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. HJ Choi YY Choi SH Hong (2002) ArticleTitleIncidence and prognostic implications of isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes from patients with Dukes B colorectal carcinoma Dis Colon Rectum 45 750–5 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6291-0 Occurrence Handle12072625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. R Cutait VA Alves LC Lopes et al. (1991) ArticleTitleRestaging of colorectal cancer based on the identification of lymph node micrometastases through immunoperoxidase staining of CEA and cytokeratins Dis Colon Rectum 34 917–20 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D3cnps1I%3D Occurrence Handle1717210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. ER Fisher L Colangelo S Wieand B Fisher N Wolmark (2003) ArticleTitleLack of influence of cytokeratin-positive mini micrometastases in “negative node” patients with colorectal cancer: findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel projects protocols R-01 and C-01 Dis Colon Rectum 46 1021–5 Occurrence Handle12907892

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. MD Jeffers GM O’Dowd H Mulcahy M Stagg DP O’Donoghue M Toner (1994) ArticleTitleThe prognostic significance of immunohistochemically detected lymph node micrometastases in colorectal carcinoma J Pathol 172 183–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB38zksFQ%3D Occurrence Handle7513353

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Y Nakanishi A Ochiai Y Yamauchi Y Moriya K Yoshimura S Hirohashi (1999) ArticleTitleClinical implications of lymph node micrometastases in patients with colorectal cancers. A case control study Oncology 57 276–80 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000012060 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXnvVKktLw%3D Occurrence Handle10575311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. A Oberg R Stenling B Tavelin G Lindmark (1998) ArticleTitleAre lymph node micrometastases of any clinical significance in Dukes Stages A and B colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 41 1244–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank William Joy, Theo Klopf, Luci Saha, M.D., M.P.H., Cynthia Duncanson, and Kimberly Barber, Ph.D., for their generous assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukamal Saha M.D., FRCSC.

About this article

Cite this article

Saha, S., Monson, K., Bilchik, A. et al. Comparative Analysis of Nodal Upstaging Between Colon and Rectal Cancers by Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: A Prospective Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1767–1772 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0661-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0661-5

Key words

Navigation