Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

H-Pouch: New Isoperistaltic Colonic Pouch For Coloanal Anastomosis After Rectal Resection For Cancer. A Pilot Study

  • Technical Notes
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

To date, there is a consensus to consider colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis as the standard form of reconstruction after proctectomy for cancer. However, one drawback of colonic J-pouch is evacuation difficulties, which are observed at some degree in almost one-half of patients. To improve functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis, we describe a new technique of isoperistaltic colonic H-pouch.

METHODS

The functional results after construction of this pouch were assessed prospectively in ten patients and compared with those obtained in a control group of matched patients with a colonic J-pouch.

RESULTS

At six months and one year, there were no differences between both pouches for bowel function, continence score, and evacuation difficulties.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study showed that the creation of a new isoperistaltic colonic H-pouch did not improve the functional results after coloanal anastomosis compared with colonic J-pouch. Because colonic H-pouch is technically more complex to fashion, it should not be performed routinely and the J-pouch remains the benchmark for routine clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. O Hallböök L Pahlman M Krog SD Wexner R Sjodahl (1996) ArticleTitleRandomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection Ann Surg 224 58–65 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199607000-00009 Occurrence Handle8678619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. M Sailer KH Fuchs M Fein A Thiede (2002) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial comparing quality of life after straight and pouch coloanal reconstruction Br J Surg 89 1108–17 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02194.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjsVWisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12190675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. ER Dennett BR Parry (1999) ArticleTitleMisconceptions about the colonic J-pouch: what the accumulating data show Dis Colon Rectum 42 804–11 Occurrence Handle10378606

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. YH Ho S Brown SM Heah et al. (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates Ann Surg 236 49–55 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200207000-00009 Occurrence Handle12131085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. J Hida M Yasutomi T Maruyama T Tokoro T Wakano T Uchida (1999) ArticleTitleEnlargement of colonic pouch after proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis: potential cause for evacuation difficulty Dis Colon Rectum 42 1181–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvisVykug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10496559

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. A Berger E Tiret R Parc et al. (1992) ArticleTitleExcision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum World J Surg 16 470–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B2s7ltlQ%3D Occurrence Handle1589983

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. OS Miettinen (1969) ArticleTitleIndividual matching with multiple controls in the case of all-or-none responses Biometrics 25 339–54 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCaB3svlsVU%3D Occurrence Handle5794104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. F Lazorthes R Gamagami P Chiotasso G Istvan S Muhammad (1997) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 40 1409–13 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FmvFyltw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9407976

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. GG Browning AG Parks (1983) ArticleTitlePostanal repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence: correlation of clinical result and anal pressures Br J Surg 70 101–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyC38fitVA%3D Occurrence Handle6824891

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O Hallböök R Sjodahl (1997) ArticleTitleComparison between the colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis and healthy rectum: clinical and physiological function Br J Surg 84 1437–41 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2168.1997.02807.x Occurrence Handle9361608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. AK Banerjee R Parc (1996) ArticleTitlePrediction of optimum dimensions of colonic pouch reservoir Dis Colon Rectum 39 1293–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2snht1E%3D Occurrence Handle8918442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. J Hida M Yasutomi K Fujimoto et al. (1996) ArticleTitleFunctional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch: prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size Dis Colon Rectum 39 986–91 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA1M%2Fmslc%3D Occurrence Handle8797646

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. FT Huber B Herter JR Siewert (1999) ArticleTitleColonic pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection Dis Colon Rectum 42 896–902 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzjslansQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10411436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J Hida M Yasutomi T Maruyama et al. (1999) ArticleTitleHorizontal inclination of the longitudinal axis of the colonic J-pouch: defining causes of evacuation difficulty Dis Colon Rectum 42 1560–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FnvVKgtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10613474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. N Williams F Seow-Choen (1998) ArticleTitlePhysiological and functional outcome following ultra-low anterior resection with colon pouch-anal anastomosis Br J Surg 85 1029–35 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00804.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czot1SqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9717992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. GJ Harris IJ Lavery VW Fazio (2002) ArticleTitleReasons for failure to construct the colonic J-pouch. What can be done to improve the size of the neorectal reservoir should it occur? Dis Colon Rectum 45 1304–8 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6355-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38njsV2jtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12394426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. MO Flüe Particlevon LP Degen C Beglinger AC Hellwig JM Rothenbuhler FH Harder (1996) ArticleTitleIleocecal reservoir reconstruction with physiologic function after total mesorectal cancer excision Ann Surg 224 204–12 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199608000-00014 Occurrence Handle8757385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. EW Fonkalsrud M Stelzner N McDonald (1988) ArticleTitleConstruction of an ileal reservoir in patients with a previous straight endorectal ileal pull-through Ann Surg 208 50–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieB28fivFI%3D Occurrence Handle2839124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Nordlinger M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Gëré, D., Benoist, S., Penna, C. et al. H-Pouch: New Isoperistaltic Colonic Pouch For Coloanal Anastomosis After Rectal Resection For Cancer. A Pilot Study. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1740–1744 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0632-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0632-x

Key words

Navigation