Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 47, Issue 7, pp 1164–1169 | Cite as

Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy With Local Anesthesia can be Performed Safely and Cost-Efficiently

  • Steven Esser
  • Indru Khubchandani
  • Mikhail Rakhmanine
Original Contribution


This prospective study was designed to assess the feasibility of performing the procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids, or stapled hemorrhoidectomy, under local anesthesia supplemented with conscious sedation.


Seventy consecutive patients (mean age, 56 years; 37 males) with Grade 3 or 4 hemorrhoids underwent the procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids after perianal infiltration of 0.5 percent lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and supplemental conscious sedation. The procedure was performed in an outpatient setting, with the patient being discharged within two hours of checking into the ambulatory facility. All patients were assessed the following day by telephone, and then in the office at three weeks and two months for degree of postoperative pain, bleeding, continence, and time back to work or social activities. Additionally, all excised mucosal anastomotic rings were analyzed for presence or absence of muscle.


Each patient rated the pain as minimal or none. Five patients complained of mild, transient perineal pressure, and three complained of fecal urgency and seepage before their first office visit; one complained of external skin tags at the second office visit. All subjects were back to work or social activities within three to four days—most within 48 hours. Complications included urinary retention in five patients, two of whom had a concomitant urinary tract infection, and one had urosepsis requiring hospitalization. One patient required immediate reoperation for bleeding from the staple line. Another patient was admitted for postoperative bleeding and packed with a hemostatic agent the evening of surgery. Muscularis propria fibers were identified in 68 of 70 pathologic specimens.


Administration of general, spinal, or epidural anesthesia for the procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids is well described. This study suggests that the use of local anesthesia supplemented with conscious sedation for the procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids yields results equivalent to those achieved with general or regional anesthesia without the attendant risks and additional costs. This study also suggests that the presence of muscle fibers in the pathologic specimen does not seem to lead to increased pain or impaired continence, although it was not specifically designed to address this issue.

Key words

Prolapsing hemorrhoids Hemorrhoidectomy Stapled hemorrhoidectomy Outpatient procedure Local anesthesia Conscious sedation Pain Continence 


  1. 1.
    Goligher, J 1984Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon5th edBallière TindallLondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Law, WL, Chu, KW 1999Triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids: prospective, randomized trial of use of local anesthetic injectionDis Colon Rectum423637Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murie, JA, Sim, AJ, Mackenzie, I 1982Rubber band ligation versus haemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing haemorrhoids: a long term prospective clinical trialBr J Surg695368Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peng, BC, Jayne, DG, Ho, YH 2003Randomized trial of rubber band ligation vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed pilesDis Colon Rectum462917Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacRae, HM, McLeod, RS 1995Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: a meta-analysisDis Colon Rectum3868794Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaufmann, HD 1976Outpatient treatment of hemorrhoids by cryotherapyBr J Surg634623Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Milligan, ET, Morgan, CN 1937Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and operative treatment of hemorrhoidsLancet2111924Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferguson, JA, Heaton, JR 1959Closed hemorrhoidectomyDis Colon Rectum21769Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khubchandani, IT, Trimpi, HD, Sheets, JA 1972Closed hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesiaSurg Gynaecol Obstet1359557Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khubchandani, I 1988Operative hemorrhoidectomySurg Clin North Am6814116Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Watts, JM, Bennet, RC, Duthie, HL, Goligher, JC 1965Pain after haemorrhoidectomySurg Gynaecol Obstet120103742Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Watts, JM, Bennet, RC, Duthie, HL, Goligher, JC 1964Healing and pain after different forms of haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg5180817Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khubchandani, IT 2002Internal sphincterotomy with hemorrhoidectomy does not relieve pain: a prospective, randomized studyDis Colon Rectum4514527Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ho, YH, Seow-Choen, F, Low, JY, Tan, M, Leong, AP 1997Randomized trial of trimbutine (anal sphincter relaxant) for pain after hemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg843779Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carapeti, E, Kamm, M, McDonald, P, Phillips, R 1998Double-blind randomised control of effect of metronidazole on pain after day-case hemorrhoidectomyLancet35116972Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Balfour, L, Stojkovic, SG, Botterill, ID, Burke, DA, Finan, PJ, Sagar, PM 2002A randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of metronidazole on pain after closed hemorrhoidectomyDis Colon Rectum45118691Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wasvary, HJ, Hain, J, Mosed-Vogel, M, Benedick, P, Barkel, DC, Klein, SN 2001Randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of effect of nitroglycerin ointment on pain after hemorrhoidectomyDis Colon Rectum44106973Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hodgson, WJ, Morgan, J 1995Ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy with CO2 laserDis Colon Rectum3812659Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Armstrong, DN, Ambroze, WL, Schertzer, ME, Orangio, GR 2001Harmonic Scalpel vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluationDis Colon Rectum4455864Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tan, JJY, Seow-Choen, F 2001Prospective, randomized trial comparing diathermy and Harmonic Scalpel® hemorrhoidectomyDis Colon Rectum446779Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khan, S, Pawlak, SE, Eggenberger, JC,  et al. 2001Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids: prospective, randomized trial comparing closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the Harmonic Scalpel technique of excisional hemorrhoidectomyDis Colon Rectum448459Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sayfan, J, Becker, A, Koltun, L 2001Sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy: a new techniqueAnn Surg234214Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Whitehead, W 1882The surgical treatment of hemorrhoidsBMJ114850Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rand, AA 1969The sliding skin-flap graft operation for hemorrhoids: a modification of the Whitehead procedureDis Colon Rectum1226576Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barrios, G, Khubchandani, M 1979Whitehead operation revisitedDis Colon Rectum223302Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hodedadi, J, Kurgan, A, Jersky, J 1979The Whitehead operation for advanced hemorrhoidsDis Colon Rectum2223840Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wolff, BG, Culp, CE 1988The Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy. An unjustly maligned procedureDis Colon Rectum3158790Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bonello, JC 1988Who’s afraid of the dentate line? The Whitehead hemorrhoidectomyAm J Surg1561826Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Allegra, G 1990Experiences with mechanical staplers: hemorrhoidectomy using a circular staplerG Chir11957Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pescatori, M, Favetta, U, Dedola, S, Orsini, S 1997Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosa prolapseTech Coloproctol1968Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular stapling device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore, 1998:777–84.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rowsell, M, Bello, M, Hemingway, DM 2000Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trialLancet35577981Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mehigan, BJ, Monson, JR, Hartley, JE 2000Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trialLancet3557825Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ho, YH, Cheong, WK, Tsang, C,  et al. 2000Stapled hemorrhoidectomy - cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three monthsDis Colon Rectum43166675Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pernice, LM, Bartalucci, B, Bencini, L, Borri, A, Catarzi, S, Kröning, K 2001Early and late (ten years) experience with circular stapler hemorrhoidectomyDis Colon Rectum4483641Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arnaud, JP, Pessaux, P, Huten, N,  et al. 2001Treatment of hemorrhoids with circular stapler, a new alternative to conventional methods: a prospective study of 140 patientsJ Am Coll Surg1931615Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beattie, GC, Loudon, MA 2001Follow-up confirms sustained benefit of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of prolapsing haemorrhoidsBr J Surg888502Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Khalil, KH, O’Bichere, A, Sellu, D 2000Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg8713525Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boccasanta, P, Capretti, PG, Venturi, M,  et al. 2001Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapseAm J Surg182648Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shalaby, R, Desoky, A 2001Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg88104953Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hetzer, FH, Demartines, N, Handschin, AE, Clavien, PA 2002Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trialArch Surg13733740Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Correa-Rovelo, JM, Tellez, O, Obregón, L, Miranda-Gomez, A, Moran, S 2002Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trialDis Colon Rectum45136775Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wilson, MS, Pope, V, Doran, HE, Fearn, SJ, Brough, WA 2002Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trialDis Colon Rectum45143744Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sutherland, LM, Burchard, AK, Matsuda, K,  et al. 2002A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomyArch Surg1371395406Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Marti, MC 1999Mechanical hemorrhoidectomy using circular staples: warning to colleaguesSwiss Surg51514Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ortiz, H, Marzo, J, Armendariz, P 2002Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg89137681Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kairaluoma, M, Nuorva, K, Kellokumpu, I 2003Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcomeDis Colon Rectum46939Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cheetham, MJ, Mortensen, NJ, Nystrom, PO, Kamm, MA, Phillips, RK 2000Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomyLancet3567303Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cheetham, MJ, Cohen, CR, Kamm, MA, Phillips, RK 2003A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-upDis Colon Rectum464917Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Molloy, RG, Kingsmore, DK 2000Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomyLancet355810Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ripetti, V, Caricato, M, Arullani, A 2002Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerationsDis Colon Rectum4526870Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wong, LY, Jiang, JK, Chang, SC, Lin, JK 2003Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a caseDis Colon Rectum461167Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Singer, MA, Cintron, JR, Fleshman, JW,  et al. 2002Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United StatesDis Colon Rectum453609Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gabrielli, F, Chiarelli, M, Cioffi, U,  et al. 2001Day surgery for mucosal-hemorrhoidal prolapse using a circular stapler and modified regional anesthesiaDis Colon Rectum448424Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gabrielli, F, DiSibio, T, Chiarelli, M,  et al. 1996The posterior perineal block in proctological day-surgeryColoproctology181339Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Marti, MC 1976L’anesthésie locale en proctologieNouv Presse Med520757Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Petros, JG, Bradley, TM 1990Factors influencing postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing surgery for benign anorectal diseaseAm J Surg1593746Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Read, TE, Henry, SE, Hovis, RM,  et al. 2002Prospective evaluation of anesthetic technique for anorectal surgeryDis Colon Rectum45155360Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Esser
    • 1
  • Indru Khubchandani
    • 1
  • Mikhail Rakhmanine
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehigh Valley HospitalAllentown

Personalised recommendations