Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of Patients With Indeterminate Colitis Undergoing a Double-Stapled Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of patients with indeterminate colitis undergoing double-stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of demographic, disease-related, and outcome variables of all patients undergoing double-stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis from August 1988 to January 2000 was undertaken. All patients were evaluated using the validated American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Fecal Incontinence Severity Index. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, those who had undergone pouch revision or had S-configured pouches, and patients with a follow-up of less than three months were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-five patients underwent the double-stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis; of these 303 patients were included for analysis. The mean duration of follow-up was 40 months. Fifty-six (18.1 percent) had a preoperative diagnosis of indeterminate colitis. Postoperatively, indeterminate colitis was diagnosed in 13 (4.3 percent), mucosal ulcerative colitis in 285 (94 percent), and Crohn’s disease in 5 (1.6 percent). The overall complication rate was 37.7 percent, 60 percent, and (30.7) percent in patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and indeterminate colitis, respectively. Postoperative hemorrhage, abscess, and fistula occurred in 2.4 percent, 6.3 percent, and 3.9 percent, respectively, in patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis, and 0 percent, 15.3 percent, and 7.7 percent, respectively, in patients with indeterminate colitis. Small-bowel obstruction occurred in 8.5 percent, 20 percent, and 7.7 percent of patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and indeterminate colitis, respectively. Pouchitis occurred in 4.6 percent of patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis but in none of the patients with indeterminate colitis. Dysplasia of the anal transition zone was seen in one patient each with mucosal ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis. These patients had consistent follow-up and neither showed any sign of evolution to neoplastic disease. None of the patients with indeterminate colitis had a postoperative diagnosis of Crohn’s disease during the follow-up period. Functional outcome was comparable in all three patient groups.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of the double-stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate colitis is similar to that of patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis. Therefore, it is a safe option in patients with indeterminate colitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. SD Wexner K James DG Jagelman (1991) ArticleTitleThe double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis: a prospective review of sphincter function and clinical outcome Dis Colon Rectum 34 487–94

    Google Scholar 

  2. PW Marcello DJ Schoetz SuffixJr PL Roberts et al. (1997) ArticleTitleEvolutionary changes in the pathologic diagnosis after the ileoanal pouch procedure Dis Colon Rectum 40 263–9

    Google Scholar 

  3. KG Atkinson DA Owen G Wankling (1994) ArticleTitleRestorative proctocolectomy and indeterminate colitis Am J Surg 167 516–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. CS Yu JS Pemberton DH Larson (2000) ArticleTitleIleal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate colitis: long-term results Dis Colon Rectum 43 1487–96

    Google Scholar 

  5. TH Rockwood JM Church JW Fleshman et al. (2000) ArticleTitleFecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 43 9–17

    Google Scholar 

  6. SD Wexner DG Jagelman (1989) The double-stapled ileoanal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis (monograph) CineMed Woodbury

    Google Scholar 

  7. SD Wexner DG Jagelman (1990) ArticleTitleThe double stapled ileoanal reservoir Perspect Colon Rectal Surg 3 132–44

    Google Scholar 

  8. NH Hyman VW Fazio WB Tuckson IC Lavery (1991) ArticleTitleConsquences of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn’s colitis Dis Colon Rectum 34 653–7

    Google Scholar 

  9. PM Sagar RR Dozois BG Wolff (1996) ArticleTitleLong-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with Crohn’s disease Dis Colon Rectum 39 893–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. ME Pezim JH Pemberton RW Beart SuffixJr et al. (1989) ArticleTitleOutcome of “indeterminate” colitis following ileal pouch anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 32 653–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. PB McIntyre JH Pemberton BG Wolff RR Dozois RW Beart SuffixJr (1995) ArticleTitleIndeterminate colitis: long-term outcome in patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 38 51–4

    Google Scholar 

  12. AD Wells I McMillan AB Price JK Ritchie RJ Nicholls (1991) ArticleTitleNatural history of indeterminate colitis Br J Surg 78 179–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven D. Wexner M.D..

Additional information

This work was funded in part by a research grant from the Eleanor Naylor Dana Charitable Trust Fund.

About this article

Cite this article

Pishori, T., Dinnewitzer, A., Zmora, O. et al. Outcome of Patients With Indeterminate Colitis Undergoing a Double-Stapled Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 717–721 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-003-0116-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-003-0116-4

Key words

Navigation