Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-society guideline for reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes

  • Shea Position Paper
  • Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Summary

Flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic tool for the care of patients with gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary disorders. Compliance with accepted guidelines for the reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopes between patients is critical to the safety and success of their use. When these guidelines are followed, pathogen transmission can be effectively prevented. Increased efforts and resources should be directed to improve compliance with these guidelines. Further research in the area of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing should be encouraged. The organizations that endorsed this guideline are committed to assisting the FDA and manufacturers in addressing critical infection control issues in gastrointestinal device reprocessing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Favero MS, Bond WW. Disinfection of medical and surgical materials. In: Block SS (ed) Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001:881–917

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spach DH, Silverstein FE, Stamm WE. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:117–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kimmey MB, Burnett DA, Carr-Locke DL, et al. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;36:885–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lo Passo C, Pernice I, Celeste A, Perdichizzi G, Todaro-Luck F. Transmission of Trichosporon asahii esophagitis by a contaminated endoscope. Mycoses 2001;44:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bronowicki J-P, Venard V, Botté C, et al. Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus during colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 1997;337:237–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Le Pogam S, Gondeau A, Bacq Y. Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:794

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tennenbaum R, Colardelle P, Chochon M, Maison-neuve P, Jean F, Andrieu J. Hepatitis C after retrograde cholangiography. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1993;17:763–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notifications for Endoscopes Used in Gastroenterology and Urology. Rockville, MD: National Press Office, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garner JS, Favero MS. CDC guideline for handwashing and hospital environmental control, 1985. Infect Control 1986;7:231–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. DiMarino AJ, Leung J, Ravich W, et al. Reprocessing of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:540–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvarado CJ, Reichelderfer M. APIC guidelines for infection prevention and control in flexible endoscopy. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:138–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Practice for Cleaning and Disinfection of Flexible Fiberoptic and Video Endoscopes Used in the Examination of the Hollow Viscera. West Conshohocken, PA, American Society for Testing and Materials, 2000. F1518–00.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses. Recommended Practices for Use and Care of Endoscopes: 2002 Standards, Recommended Practices, and Guidelines. Denver, Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses, 2002:229–232.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates. Standards of infection control in reprocessing of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Gastroenterol Nurs 2000; 23:172–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorse GJ, Messner RL. Infection control practices in gastrointestinal endoscopy in the United States: a national survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:289–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaczmarek RG, Moore RM, John M, et al. Multi-state investigation of the actual disinfection/sterilization of endoscopes in health care facilities. Am J Med 1992;92: 257–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Reynolds CD, Rhinehart E, Dreyer P, Goldman DA. Variability in reprocessing policies and procedures for flexible fiberoptic endoscopes in Massachusetts hospitals. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:283–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson FW, Ball MD. Correction of deficiencies in flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope cleaning and disinfection technique in family practice and internal medicine offices. Arch Fam Med 1997;6:578–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheung RJ, Ortiz D, DiMarino AJ. GI endoscopic reprocessing practices in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:362–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Muscarella LF. Current instrument reprocessing practices: results of a national survey. Gastroenterol Nurs 2001;24:253–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rutala WA, Weber DJ, the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities. Am J Infect Control. In preparation.

  22. Merritt K, Hitchins VM, Brown SA. Safety and cleaning of medical materials and devices. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:131–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Babb JR, Bradley CR. Endoscope reprocessing: where do we go from here? J Hosp Infect 1995;30:543–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanson PJV, Gor D, Clarke JR, et al. Contamination of endoscopes used in AIDS patients. Lancet 1989;2:86–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vesley D, Norlien KG, Nelson B, Ott B, Streifel AJ. Significant factors in the disinfection and sterilization of flexible endoscopes. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:291–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rutala WA. APIC guideline for selection and use of disinfectants. Am J Infect Control 1996;24:313–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Urayama S, Kozarek RA, Sumida S, Raltz S, Merriam L, Pethigal P. Mycobacteria and glutaraldehyde: is high-level disinfection of endoscopes possible? Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:451–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. British Society of Gastroenterology. Cleaning and disinfection of equipment for gastrointestinal endoscopy: report of a Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Committee. Gut 1998;42:585–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chu NS, McAlister D, Antonoplos PA. Natural bioburden levels detected on flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after clinical use and manual cleaning. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:137–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cronmiller JR, Nelson DK, Salman G, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of endoscopic disinfection procedures: a controlled, multifactorial investigation. Gastrointest Endosc 1999:50:152–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kovacs BJ, Chen YK, Kettering JD, Aprecio RM, Roy I. High-level disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes: are current guidelines adequate? Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1546–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vesley D, Melson J, Patricia S. Microbial bioburden in endoscope reprocessing and an in-use evaluation of the high-level disinfection capabilities of Cidex PA. Gastroenterol Nurs 1999;22:63–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines on cleaning and disinfection in GI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2000;32:77–83

    Google Scholar 

  34. Graham DY, Osato MS. Disinfection of biopsy forceps and culture of Helicobacter pylori from gastric mucosal biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1422–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses. Recommended Practices for High-Level Disinfection: 2002 Standards, Recommended Practices, and Guidelines. Denver, Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses, 2002:211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Food and Drug Administration. FDA-Cleared Sterilants and High Level Disinfectants With General Claims for Processing Reusable Medical and Dental Devices 1/30/ 02. Rockville, MD, National Press Office, 2002. Available at www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/germlab.html. Accessed 2002;December:9.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Collins FM. Kinetics of tuberculocidal response by alkaline glutaraldehyde in solution and on an inert surface. J Appl Bacteriol 1986;61:87–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Collins FM. Bactericidal activity of alkaline glutaraldehyde solution against a number of atypical mycobacterial species. J Appl Bacteriol 1986;61:247–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ascenzi JM, Ezzell RJ, Wendt TM. A more accurate method for measurement of tuberculocidal activity of disinfectants. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987;53:2189–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Collins FM. Use of membrane filters for measurement of mycobacterial activity of alkaline glutaraldehyde solution. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987;53:737–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Best M, Sattar SA, Springthorpe VS, Kennedy ME. Efficacies of selected disinfectants against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2234–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cole EC, Rutala WA, Nessen L, Wannamaker NS, Weber DJ. Effect of methodology, dilution, and exposure time on the tuberculocidal activity of glutaraldehyde-based disinfectants. Appl Environ Microbiol 1990;56:1813–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hanson PJV, Gor D, Jeffries DJ, Collins JV. Elimination of high titre HIV from fiberoptic endoscopes. Gut 1990; 31:657–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hanson PJ, Jeffries DJ, Collins JV. Viral transmission and fibreoptic endoscopy. J Hosp Infect 1991;18:136–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rutala WA, Cole EC, Wannamaker NS, Weber DJ. Inactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis by 14 hospital disinfectants. Am J Med 1991;91:267S-71S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hanson PJ, Chadwick MV, Gaya H, Collins JV. A study of glutaraldehyde disinfection of fibreoptic bronchoscopes experimentally contaminated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Hosp Infect 1992;22:137–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Best M, Springthorpe VS, Sattar SA. Feasibility of a combined carrier test for disinfectants: studies with a mixture of five types of microorganisms. Am J Infect Control 1994;22:152–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Jackson J, Leggett JE, Wilson D, Gilbert DN. Mycobacterium gordonae in fiberoptic bronchoscopes. Am J Infect Control 1996;24:19–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Chanzy B, Duc-Bin DL, Rousset B, et al. Effectiveness of a manual disinfection procedure in eliminating hepatitis C virus from experimentally contaminated endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:147–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Fuselier HA, Mason C. Liquid sterilization versus high level disinfection in the urologic office. Urology 1997; 50:337–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Disinfection of endoscopes: review of new chemical sterilants used for high-level disinfection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:69–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Importance of lumen flow in liquid chemical sterilization. Am J Infect Control 1999; 20:458–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sorin M, Segal-Maurer S, Urban C, Combest A, Rahal JJ. Nosocomial transmission of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa following bronchoscopy associated with improper connection to the Steris System 1 processor. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;20: 514–6

    Google Scholar 

  54. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bronchoscopy-related infections and pseudoinfections: New York, 1996 and 1998. MMWR 1999;48:557–60

  55. Allen JI. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection during endoscopy: reply. Gastroenterology 1987;93:1451

    Google Scholar 

  56. Streulens MJ, Rost F, Deplano A, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia after biliary endoscopy: an outbreak investigation using DNA macrorestriction analysis. Am J Med 1993;95:489–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. O’Connor HJ, Babb JR, Ayliffe GAJ. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection during endoscopy. Gastroenterology 1987;93:1451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Alvarado CJ, Stolz SM, Maki DG. Nosocomial infections from contaminated endoscopes: a flawed automated endoscope washer. An investigation using molecular epidemiology. Am J Med 1991;91:272S-80S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nosocomial infection and pseudoinfection from contaminated endoscopes and bronchoscopes: Wisconsin and Missouri. MMWR 1991;40:675–8

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fraser VJ, Jones M, Murray PR, Medoff G, Zhang Y, Wallace RJ. Contamination of flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopes with Mycobacterium chelonae linked to an automated bronchoscope disinfection machine. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;145:853–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gerding DN, Peterson LR, Vennes JA. Cleaning and disinfection of fiberoptic endoscopes: evaluation of glutaraldehyde exposure time and forced-air drying. Gastroenterology 1982;83:613–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Allen JI, Allen MOC, Olson MM, et al. Pseudomonas infection of the biliary system resulting from use of a contaminated endoscope. Gastroenterology 1987;92: 759–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Alfa MJ, Sitter DL. In hospital evaluation of contamination of duodenoscopes: a quantitative assessment of the effects of drying. J Hosp Infect 1991;19:89–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Noy MF, Harrison L, Holmes GKT, Cockel R. The significance of bacterial contamination of fiberoptic endoscopes. J Hosp Infect 1980;1:53–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Meenhorst PL, Reingold AL, Groothuis D. Water-related nosocomial pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1 and 10. J Infect Dis 1985;152:356–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wright EP, Collins CH, Yates MD. Mycobacterium xenopi and Mycobacterium kansasii in a hospital water supply. J Hosp Infect 1985;6:175–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Water as a reservoir of nosocomial pathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997; 18:609–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Wallace RJ, Brown BA, Driffith DE. Nosocomial outbreaks/pseudooutbreaks caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 1998;52:453–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Nelson DB, Barkun AN, Block KP, et al. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:824–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Rutala WA, Hamory BH. Expanding role of hospital epidemiology: employee health-chemical exposure in the health care setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1989; 10:261–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Air contaminants, final rule. 58 Federal Register 35338–35351 (1993).

  72. Weber DJ, Rutala WA. Occupational risks associated with the use of selected disinfectants and sterilants. In: Rutala WA (ed) Disinfection, Sterilization, and Antisepsis in Healthcare. Champlain, NY, Polyscience Publications, 1998:211–226

    Google Scholar 

  73. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biologic Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: hazard communication standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200.

  75. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens, final rule. 56 Federal Register 64003–64182 (1991).

  76. Carr-Locke DL, Conn MI, Faigel DO, et al. Personal protective equipment. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:854–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Bond WW, Hedrick ER. Microbiological culturing of environment and medical-device surfaces. In: Isenberg HD, Gilchrist MJR (eds) Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. Washington, DC, American Society for Microbiology, 1992:11.0.1–11.0.9

    Google Scholar 

  78. Dixon RE. Investigation of endemic and epidemic nos-ocomial infection data. In: Bennett JL, Brachman P (eds) Hospital Infection, 3rd ed, Boston, Little Brown, 1992: 109–135

    Google Scholar 

  79. Food and Drug Administration. (2002) Medical device reporting (MDR). Available at www.fda.gov/cdrh/mdr/ Accessed November 20

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, D.B., Jarvis, W.R., Rutala, W.A. et al. Multi-society guideline for reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 413–420 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-003-0098-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-003-0098-2

Keywords

Navigation