, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 549–560 | Cite as

Quantification of reactivated landslide behaviour using acoustic emission monitoring

  • N. Dixon
  • M. P. Spriggs
  • A. Smith
  • P. Meldrum
  • E. Haslam
Original Paper


Slope failures world-wide cause many thousands of deaths each year and damage built environment infrastructure, costing billions of pounds to repair, resulting in thousands of people being made homeless and the breakdown of basic services such as water supply and transport. There is a clear need for affordable instrumentation that can provide an early warning of slope instability to enable the evacuation of vulnerable people and timely repair and maintenance of critical infrastructure. An approach, Assessment of Landslides using Acoustic Real-time Monitoring Systems (ALARMS) is described in the paper, and results of a field trial of sensors on an active landslide at Hollin Hill, North Yorkshire, UK, are described. Continuous and real-time monitoring of acoustic emission generated by the deforming slope has been compared to traditional inclinometer slope displacement measurements. Analysis of the results has established that there is a direct relationship between acoustic emission rate and displacement rate trends triggered by rainfall events. The technique has provided insight into reactivated slope movement kinematics.


Acoustic emission (AE) Reactivated landslide Deformatons Instrumentation 



We would like to extend our sincerest gratitude to Steve and Josie Gibson (the Hollin Hill landowners) for their support and cooperation in the research. This paper is published with the permission of the Executive Director of the British Geological Survey (NERC).


  1. Allison RJ, Brunsden D (1990) Some mudslide movement patterns. Earth Surf Process Landf 15:297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chambers JE, Weller AL, Gunn DA, Kuras O, Wilkinson PB, Meldrum PI, Ogilvy RD, Jenkins GO, Gibson AD, FordJR, Price S.J (2008) Geophysical anatomy of the Hollin Hill landslide, North Yorkshire, UK near surface 2008—14th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Poland, September, pp5Google Scholar
  3. Chambers JE, Wilkinson PB, Kuras O, Ford JR, Gunn DA, Meldrum PI, Pennington CVL, Weller AL, Hobbs PRN, Ogilvy RD (2011) Three-dimensional geophysical anatomy of an active landslide in Lias Group Mudrocks, Cleveland Basin, UK. Geomorphology 125(4):472–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dixon N, Hill R, Kavanagh J (2003) Acoustic emission monitoring of slope instability: development of an active wave guide system. Inst Civil Eng Geotech Eng J 156(2):83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dixon N, Spriggs M (2007) Quantification of slope displacement rates using acoustic emission monitoring. Can Geotech J 44(6):966–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixon N, Spriggs MP, Meldrum P, Ogilvy R, Haslam E, Chambers J (2010) Development of a low cost acoustic emission early warning system for slope instability. In: Williams AL, Pinches GM, Chin CY, McMorran TJ, Massey CI (eds) Proceedings 11th International Association of Engineering Geologists. Taylor and Francis Pubs, Auckland, September, 1803-1810Google Scholar
  7. Dixon N, Spriggs M (2011) Apparatus and method for monitoring soil slope displacement rate. UK Patent Application GB 2467419A, Awarded May 2011Google Scholar
  8. Dixon N, Spriggs MP, Meldrum P, Haslam E (2012) Field trial of an acoustic emission early warning system for slope instability. In landslides and engineered slopes: protecting society through improved understanding, 1399–1404Google Scholar
  9. Dunnicliff J (1988) Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance, John Wiley & Sons, pp 577Google Scholar
  10. Fujiwara T, Ishibashi A, Monma K (1999) Application of acoustic emission method to Shirasu slope monitoring. In slope stability engineering, Yagi, Yamagami & Jiang, Balkema, Rotterdam, 147–150Google Scholar
  11. Gunn DA, Chambers JE, Hobbs PRN, Ford JR, Wilkinson PB, Jenkins GO, Merrit A (2013) Rapid observations to guide the design of systems for long-term monitoring of a complex landslide in the Upper Lias Clays of North Yorkshire, UK. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 46(3):323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hutchinson JN (1988) General report: morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology. In Proc 5th International Symposium on Landslides, Lausanne, 3–35Google Scholar
  13. Koerner RM, McCabe WM, Lord AE (1981) Acoustic emission behaviour and monitoring of soils. In acoustic emission in geotechnical practice, ASTM STP 750, pp. 93–141Google Scholar
  14. Leroueil S (2001) Natural slopes and cuts: movement and failure mechanisms. Geotechnique 51(3):197–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lockner D (1993) The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min 30(7):883–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maji AK, Satpathi D, Kratochvil T (1997) Acoustic emission source location using lamb wave modes. J Eng Mech 123:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Massey CI, Petley DN, McSaveney MJ (2013) Patterns of movement in reactivated landslides. Eng Geol 159:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsuura S, Asano S, Okamoto T (2008) Relationship between rain and/or meltwater, pore-water pressure and displacement of a reactivated landslide. Eng Geol 101:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merritt AJ, Chambers JE, Murphy W, Wilkinson PB, West LJ, Gunn DA, Meldrum PI, Kirkham N, Dixon N (2013) 3D Ground model development for an active landslide in Lias Mudrocks using geophysical, remote sensing and geotechnical methods. Landslides, pp 14. doi: 10.1007/s10346-013-0409-1
  20. Michlmayr G, Cohen D, Or D (2012) Sources and characteristics of acoustic emissions from mechanically stressed geologic granular media—a review. Earth Sci Rev 112:97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michlmayr G, Cohen D, Or D (2013) Shear‐induced force fluctuations and acoustic emissions in granular material. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 118(12):6086–6098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakajima I, Negishi M, Ujihira M, Tanabe T (1991) Application of the acoustic emission monitoring rod to landslide measurement. 5th Conference on Acoustic Emission/Microseismic Activity in Geologic Structures and Materials (pp. 1–15)Google Scholar
  23. Petley DN, Mantovani F, Bulmer MH, Zannoni A (2005) The use of surface monitoring data for the interpretation of landslide movement patterns. Geomorphology 66:133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petley DN (2012) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geol Geol Soc Am 40(10):927–930Google Scholar
  25. Pollard H (1977) Sound waves in solids (pp. 6–60)Google Scholar
  26. Shiotani T, Ohtsu M (1999) Prediction of slope failure based on AE activity. In acoustic emission: standards and technology update (Vahaviolos, S.J. (Ed.)), American Society for Testing Materials, ASTM STP, Pennsylvania, 1353, pp. 157–172Google Scholar
  27. Schulz WH, Kean JW, Wang G (2009) Landslide movement in Southwest Colorado triggered by atmospheric tides. Nature Science Advance on: 1–4Google Scholar
  28. Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (1978) Landslides analysis and control, transportation research board special report 176. National Academy of Science, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. Spriggs MP (2005) Quantification of acoustic emission from soils for predicting landslide failure. PhD thesis, Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Dixon
    • 1
  • M. P. Spriggs
    • 1
  • A. Smith
    • 1
  • P. Meldrum
    • 2
  • E. Haslam
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Civil and Building EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLeicestershireUK
  2. 2.British Geological SurveyNottinghamshireUK

Personalised recommendations