Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Big Four reign in eutrophic lake reedbeds: predation on artificial waterbird nests

  • Research
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nest predation is one of the main factors shaping waterbird abundances, but the impact of different predator species varies considerably between habitats and sites. To identify nest predators and evaluate their spatio-temporal impact on waterbird broods, we carried out a study with artificial nests and camera traps placed in the reedbeds of two eutrophic lakes in northeastern Poland. We also analyzed the importance of two factors for nest survival—water depth at nest site and egg concealment. Artificial nest survival was very low, with only about 8% of the nests surviving more than 10 days. Among the four most frequently recorded nest predators that comprised 95% of all predators filmed, the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides dominated (51.7% of records), followed by the marsh harrier Circus aeruginosus (24.5%), hooded crow Corvus cornix (12.2%), and American mink Neogale vison (11.6%). The predation rate of the raccoon dog significantly increased over time, being highest in July, and was opposite to that of the marsh harrier, whose nest predation was highest in April and declined over the next months, while the predation rates of the hooded crow and mink were stable. The concealing of eggs did not significantly decrease the probability of depredating nests. Water depth also did not significantly affect nest survival, and only the raccoon dog’s predation rate was negatively related to water depth. Birds depredated nests during the day and mammals both during the day and night; however, activity patterns of four main predators highly overlapped.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author  upon reasonable request.

References

  • Angelstam P (1986) Predation on ground-nesting birds’ nests in relation to predator densities and habitat edge. Oikos 47:365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoszewicz M, Zalewski A (2003) American mink, Mustela vison diet and predation on waterfowl in the Słońsk Reserve, western Poland. Folia Zool 52:225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Batáry P, Báldi A (2005) Factors affecting the survival of real and artificial great reed warbler’s nests. Biologia 60:215–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Batáry P, Winkler H, Baldi A (2004) Experiments with artificial nests on predation in reed habitats. J Ornithol 145:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry L, Lill A (2003) Do predation rates on artificial nests accurately predict predation rates on natural nests? The effects of nest type, egg type and nest-site characteristics. Emu 103:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzeziński M, Chibowski P, Gornia J, Górecki G, Zalewski A (2018) Spatio-temporal variation in nesting success of colonial waterbirds under the impact of non-native invasive predator. Oecologia 188:1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4270-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brzeziński M, Chibowski P, Zalewski A (2022) Mink predation in great crested grebe colonies: random robbery or a well-planned hunt? J Vert Biol 71: (22056). https://doi.org/10.25225/jvb.22056

  • Brzeziński M, Marzec M, Żmihorski M (2010a) Spatial distribution, activity, habitat selection of American mink (Neovison vison) and polecats (Mustela putorius) inhabiting the vicinity of eutrophic lakes in NE Poland. Folia Zool 59:183–191. https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v59.i3.a3.2010

  • Brzeziński M, Rodak Ł, Zalewski A (2014) “Reversed” intraguild predation: red fox cubs killed by pine marten. Acta Theriol 59:473–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-014-0179-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzeziński M, Żmihorski M (2009) Nestling diet and parental provisioning behaviour in the marsh harrier (Circus aeruginosus). Acta Zool Lit 19:93–98. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10043-009-0014-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzeziński M, Żmihorski M, Barkowska M (2010b) Spatio-temporal variation in predation on artificial ground nests: a 12-year experiment. Ann Zool Fenn 47:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzeziński M, Żmihorski M, Nieoczym M, Wilniewczyc P, Zalewski A (2020) The expansion wave of an invasive predator leaves declining waterbird populations behind. Divers Distrib 26:138–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzeziński M, Żmihorski M, Zarzycka A, Zalewski A (2019) Expansion and population dynamics of a non-native invasive species: The 40-year history of American mink colonisation of Poland. Biol Invasions 21:531–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1844-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalfoun AD, Thompson FR III, Ratnaswamy MJ (2002) Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis. Conserv Biol 16:306–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chibowski P, Brzeziński M, Jedlikowski J (2015) Predation on artificial nests imitating the broods of two rallid species: the influence of habitat features. Pol J Ecol 63:573–584. https://doi.org/10.3161/15052249PJE2015.63.4.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik C (1997) Long-term effects of North American mink Mustela vison on seabirds in western Scotland. Bird Study 44:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Černý M, Rymešová D, Šálek M (2018) Switches in covering of eggs in grey partridge Perdix perdix clutches during laying and incubation. Folia Zool 67:154–157. https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v67.i3-4.a6.2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl F, Åhlén P-A (2019) Nest predation by raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in the archipelago of northern Sweden. Biol Invasions 21:743–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1855-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreras P, Macdonald DW (1999) The impact of American mink Mustela vison on water birds in the upper Thames. J Appl Ecol 36:701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine JJ, Martel M, Markland HM, Niklison AM, Decker KL, Martin TE (2007) Testing ecological and behavioral correlates of nest predation. Oikos 116:1887–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16043.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García P, Mateos I, Arevalo V (2009) Diurnal activity of the American mink (Neovison vison) in central Spain. Hystrix 20:61–68. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-20.1-4434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerell R (1969) Activity patterns of the mink Mustela vison Schreber in southern Sweden. Oikos 20:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goc M (1986) Colonial versus territorial breeding of the great crested grebe Podiceps cristatus on Lake Druzno. Acta Ornithol 22:95–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Green AJ, Elmberg J (2014) Ecosystem services provided by waterbirds. Biol Rev 89:105–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson G, Elmberg J (2008) Density-dependent nest predation - an experiment with simulated mallard nests in contrasting landscapes. Ibis 150:259–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00772.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig F (2022) DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level / mixed) regression models. R package version 0.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa

  • Harrington LA, Macdonald DW (2008) Spatial and temporal relationships between invasive American mink and native European polecats in the southern United Kingdom. J Mammal 89:991–1000. https://doi.org/10.1644/07-MAMM-A-292.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holopainen S, Arzel C, Dessborn L, Elmberg J, Gunnarsson G, Nummi P, Pöysä H, Sjöberg K (2015) Habitat use in ducks breeding in boreal freshwater wetlands: a review. Eur J Wildl Res 61:339–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-015-0921-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holopainen S, Väänänen V-M, Fox AD (2020) Landscape and habitat affect frequency of artificial duck nest predation by native species, but not by an alien predator. Basic Appl Ecol 48:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2020.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holopainen S, Väänänen V-M, Vehkaoja M, Fox AD (2021) Do alien predators pose a particular risk to duck nests in Northern Europe? Results from an artificial nest experiment. Biol Invasions 23:3795–3807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02608-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover JP (2006) Water depth influences nest predation for a wetland-dependent bird in fragmented bottomland forests. Biol Conserv 127:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedlikowski J, Brzeziński M, Chibowski P (2015) Habitat variables affecting nest predation rates at small ponds: a case study of the Little Crake Porzana parva and Water Rail Rallus aquaticus. Bird Study 62:190–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2015.1031080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jędrzejewska B, Sidorovich VE, Pikulik MM, Jędrzejewski W (2001) Feeding habits of the otter and the American mink in Białowieża Primeval Forest (Poland) compared to other Eurasian populations. Ecography 24:165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauhala K (2004) Removal of medium-sized predators and the breeding success of ducks in Finland. Folia Zool 53:367–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauhala K, Auniola M (2001) Diet of raccoon dogs in summer in the Finnish archipelago. Ecography 24:151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauhala K, Holmala K, Schregel J (2007) Seasonal activity patterns and movements of the raccoon dog, a vector of diseases and parasites, in southern Finland. Mamm Biol 72:342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2006.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller V (1989) Egg-covering behaviour by Great Crested Grebes Podiceps cristatus. Ornis Scand 20:129–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King DI, De Graaf RM, Griffin CR, Maier TJ (1999) Do predation rates on artificial nests accurately reflect predation rates on natural nests? J Field Ornithol 70:257–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Koons DN, Rotella JJ (2003) Comparative nesting success of sympatric Lesser Scaup and Ring-necked Ducks. J Field Ornithol 74:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreisinger J, Albrecht T (2008) Nest protection in mallards Anas platyrhynchos: untangling the role of crypsis and parental behaviour. Funct Ecol 22:872–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01445.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger H, Väänänen V-M, Holopainen S, Nummi P (2018) The new faces of nest predation in agricultural landscapes - a wildlife camera survey with artificial nests. Eur J Wildlife Res 64:76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-018-1233-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere S (1999) Reasons why predators cannot be inferred from nest remains. Condor 101:718–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell C (2000) Egg type influences predation rates in artificial nest experiment. J Field Ornithol 71:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major RE, Kendal CE (1996) The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions. Ibis 138:298–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin TE, Scott J, Menge C (2000) Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2287–2293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mezquida ET, Marone L (2003) Are results of artificial nest experiments a valid indicator of success of natural nests? Wilson Bull 115:270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melero Y, Palazón S, Revilla E, Gosàlbez J (2011) Winter activity patterns in an invading Mediterranean population of American mink (Neovison vison). Folia Zool 60:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith M, Ridout M (2021) overlap: Estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns. R package version 0.3.4. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=overlap

  • Moore RP, Robinson WD (2004) Artificial bird nests, external validity, and bias in ecological field studies. Ecology 85:1562–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1993) Predation and limitation of bird numbers. In: Power DM (ed) Curr Ornithol vol. 11, Chapter 4. Plenum Press, New York & London, pp 143–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemczynowicz A, Świętochowski P, Brzeziński M, Zalewski A (2017) Non-native predator control increases the nesting success of birds: American mink preying on wader nests. Biol Conserv 212:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordström M, Högmander J, Laine J, Nummelin J, Laanetu N, Korpimäki E (2003) Effects of feral mink removal on seabirds, waders and passerines on small islands in the Baltic Sea. Biol Conserv 109:359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00162-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordström M, Korpimäki E (2004) Effects of island isolation and feral mink removal on bird communities on small islands in the Baltic Sea. J Anim Ecol 73:424–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00816.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nummi P, VäänänenV-M, Pekkarinen A-J, Eronen V, Mikkola-Roos M, Nurmi J, Rautiainen A, Rusanen P (2019) Alien predation in wetlands - the raccoon dog and waterbird breeding success. Balt For 25:228–237. https://doi.org/10.46490/vol25iss2pp228

  • Opermanis O (2001) Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus predation on artificial duck nests: a field experiment. Ornis Fennica 78:198–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Opermanis O, Mednis A, Bauga I (2001) Duck nests and predators: interaction, specialization and possible management. Wildlife Biol 7:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opermanis O (2004) Appearance and vulnerability of artificial duck nests to avian predators. J Avian Biol 35:410–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picman J, Milks M, Leptich M (1993) Patterns of predation on passerine nests in marshes: effects of water depth and distance from edge. Auk 110:89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöysä H, Linkola P (2021) Extending temporal baseline increases understanding of biodiversity change in European boreal waterbird communities. Biol Conserv 257:109–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop P, Trnka A (2011) Why do grebes cover their nests? Laboratory and field tests of two alternative hypotheses. J Ethol 29:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-010-0214-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R. Found. Stat. Comput. (https://doi.org/https://www.R-project.org/)

  • Reihmanis J (2004) Relationships between the nest predation rates caused by different waterfowl nest predators: an artificial nest experiment. A U Lat Biol 676:131–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridout M, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. J Agr Biol Envir S 14:322–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos S (2002) Functional response, seasonal decline and landscape differences in nest predation risk. Oecologia 133:608–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1056-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roos S, Smart J, Gibbons DW, Wilson JD (2018) A review of predation as a limiting factor for bird populations in mesopredator-rich landscapes: a case study of the UK. Biol Rev 93:1915–1937. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salewski V, Schmidt L (2019) The raccoon dog – an important new nest predator of black-tailed godwit in northern Germany. Wader Study 126:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salonen V, Penttinen A (1988) Factors affecting nest predation in the Great Crested Grebe: field observations, experiments and their statistical analysis. Ornis Fennica 65:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwemmer P, Weiel S, Garthe S (2021) Spatio-temporal movement patterns and habitat choice of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and racoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) along the Wadden Sea coast. Eur J Wildlife Res 67:49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01474-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidorovich VE, Solovej IA, Sidorovich AA, Dyman AA (2008) Seasonal and annual variation in the diet of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in northern Belarus: the role of habitat type and family group. Acta Theriol 53:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers RW, Hockey PAR (1981) Egg-covering behaviour of the White-fronted Plover Charadrius marginatus. Ornis Scand 12:240–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutor A, Kauhala K, Ansorge H (2010) Diet of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides – a canid with an opportunistic foraging strategy. Acta Theriol 55:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torretta E, Serafini M, Puopolo F, Schenone L (2016) Spatial and temporal adjustments allowing the coexistence among carnivores in Liguria (NW Italy). Acta Ethol 19:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-015-0231-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornberg R, Haapala S (2013) The diet of the Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus breeding on the isle of Hailuoto compared to other raptors in northern Finland. Ornis Fennica 90:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underhill-Day JC (1985) The food of breeding of Marsh Harriers Circus aeruginosus in East Anglia. Bird Study 32:199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vacca MM, Handel C (1988) Factors influencing predation associated with visits to artificial goose nests. J Field Ornithol 59:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Walesiak M, Górecki G, Brzeziński M (2019) Recovery of Eurasian Coot Fulica atra and Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus breeding populations in an area invaded by the American Mink Neovison vison. Acta Ornithol 54:73–83. https://doi.org/10.3161/00016454AO2019.54.1.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski J (1989) Breeding biology and ecology of the Marsh Harrier (Circus aeruginosus) in the Barycz Valley, Poland. Acta Ornithol 25:223–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon PJ (2022) Does human scent bias the survival of bird nests? Ibis 164:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GR, Brittingham MC, Goodrich LJ (1998) How well do artificial nests estimate success of real nests? Condor 100:357–364. https://doi.org/10.2307/1370277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi N, Rushton S, Macdonald DW (2003) Habitat preferences of feral American mink in the Upper Thames. J Mammal 84:1356–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalewska K, Waggershauser CN, Kortland K, Lambin X (2021) The best defence is not being there: avoidance of larger carnivores is not driven by risk intensity. J Zool 315:110–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zduniak P (2006) The prey of Hooded Crow (Corvus cornix L.) in wetlands: study of damaged egg shells of birds. Pol J Ecol 54:491–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoller J, Drygala F (2013) Activity patterns of the invasive raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in North East Germany. Folia Zool 62:290–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuberogoitia I, Zabala J, Martinez JA (2006) Diurnal activity and observations of the hunting and ranging behaviour of the American mink (Mustela vison). Mammalia 70:310–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/MAMM.2006.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Korneliusz Kurek for his help in data collection.

Funding

Financial support was received from the University of Warsaw research funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, ul. Miecznikowa 1, Warszawa, 02-096, Poland

    Marcin Brzeziński & Tom A. Diserens

  2. Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Stoczek 1, Białowieża, 17-230, Poland

    Tom A. Diserens & Andrzej Zalewski

Authors
  1. Marcin Brzeziński
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tom A. Diserens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrzej Zalewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.B., T.A.D, and A.Z. wrote the main manuscript text; A.Z prepared Figs. 1 and 2. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Brzeziński.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval 

During the study, animals were not trapped, handled, scared, or stressed; therefore, ethic. approval was not needed. 

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brzeziński, M., Diserens, T.A. & Zalewski, A. The Big Four reign in eutrophic lake reedbeds: predation on artificial waterbird nests. Eur J Wildl Res 70, 25 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01774-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01774-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation