Abstract
This study assessed the diet composition of Salt’s dik-dik (Madoqua saltiana) in Awash National Park and is aimed at identifying the forage species and analyzing their contributions to the respective forage categories (grass or browse). Feeding duration records, coupled with quadrat surveys, were used to evaluate the dietary contributions and acceptability of the plants. Twenty plant species were found to be consumed by the animal; however, only 16 species were recorded during the dry season. The three staple plants were Acacia senegal (41.3%), Acacia mellifera (20.5%), and Balanites aegyptiaca (12.7%), and these species constituted 74.4% of the dik-diks’ diet. Between the wet and dry seasons, a similar dietary proportion was found for A. senegal, while significant variations were observed for both A. mellifera and B. aegyptiaca. From the forage categories, browse constituted the major proportion of the diet both during the wet (91.9%) and dry (93.3%) seasons, while plant litter, herbs, and grass constituted the remainder. Acceptability index analysis showed that A. mellifera was highly acceptable during the wet season followed by A. senegal. However, during the dry season, A. senegal was the most accepted plant followed by B. aegyptiaca and A. mellifera.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10344-023-01731-w/MediaObjects/10344_2023_1731_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10344-023-01731-w/MediaObjects/10344_2023_1731_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abule E, Snyman HA, Smit GN (2005) Comparisons of pastoralist perceptions about rangeland resource utilization in the Middle Awash Valley of Ethiopia. J Environ Manag 75:21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.003
Brashares JS, Garland T, Arcese P (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of coadaptation in behavior, diet, and body size in the African antelope. Behav Ecol 11:452–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/11.4.452
Brotherton PN, Manser MB (1997) Female dispersion and the evolution of monogamy in the dik-dik. Anim Behav 54:1413–1424. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0551
Cherinet T (2015) Resource base and climate change risk maps for Awash National Park. PHE-Ethiopia Consortium, Addis Ababa
Demissew S, Friis IB (2009) Natural vegetation of the flora area. In: Hedberg I, Friis I, Persson E (eds) Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa; Uppsala University, Uppsala, pp 27–32
Dittmann MT, Hebel C, Hammer S, Hummel J, Ortmann S, Arif A, Bouts T, Kreuzer M, Clauss M (2014) Energy requirements and metabolism of the Phillip’s dikdik (Madoqua saltiana phillipsi). Comp Biochem Physiol A 167:45–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.09.014
du Toit JT (1988) Patterns of resource use within the browsing ruminant guild in the central Kruger National Park. Dissertation, University of Witwatersrand
Dujardin R, Fox VE (1997) Observation on dik-dik in the Namutoni area of Etosha National Park (Madoqua kirkii). Madoqua 19:107–110
East R (1998) African Antelope Data base 1998. IUCN, Chicago zoological society, USA, IUCN/SSC Antelope Specialist Group
Gagnon M, Chew AE (2000) Dietary preferences in extant African Bovidae. J Mamm 81:490–511. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081%3C0490:DPIEAB%3E2.0.CO;2
Greenwood JJD, Robinson RA (2006) General census methods. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census techniques: a handbook, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 87–185
Hebel C, Ortmann S, Hammer S, Hammer C, Fritz J, Hummel J, Clauss M (2011) Solute and particle retention in the digestive tract of the Phillip’s dik-dik (Madoqua saltiana phillipsi), a very small browsing ruminant: biological and methodological implications. Comp Biochem Physiol – Part A: Mol Integr Physiol 159:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.03.020
Hendrichs H (1975) Changes in a population of dikdik Madoqua (Rhynchotragus) kirkii (Gu¨nther 1880). Z Tierpsychol 38:55–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14390310.1975.tb01992.x
Hensman MC, Owen-Smith N, Parrini F, Erasmus BF (2012) Dry season browsing by sable antelope in northern Botswana. Afr J Ecol 50:513–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2012.01349.x
Hoppe PP (1977) Comparison of voluntary food and water consumption and digestion in Kirk’s dikdik and suni. Afr J Ecol 15:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1977.tb00376.x
Hoppe PP, Van Hoven W, von Engelhardt W, Prins RA, Lankhorst A, Gwynne MD (1983) Pregastric and caecal fermentation in dikdik (Madoqua kirkii) and suni (Nesotragus moschatus). Comp Biochem Physiol A: Physiol 75:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(83)90414-0
Jarman PJ (1974) The social organization of antelopes in relation to their ecology. Behavior 48:215–266. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853974X00345
Kamau JM (1988) Metabolism and evaporative heat loss in the dik-dik antelope (Rhynchotragus kirkii). Comp Biochem Physiol Part A: Physiol 89:567–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(88)90834-1
Kranz K (1991) Monogamy in the dik-dik. Appl Anim Behav Sci 29:87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(91)90239-T
Leuthold W (1971) Studies on the food habits of lesser Kudu in Tsavo National Park, Kenya. Afr J Ecol 9:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1971.tb00217.x
Macandza VA, Owen-Smith N, Cross P (2004) Forage selection by African buffalo in the late dry season in two landscapes. S Afr J Wildl Res 34:113–121
Magome H, Cain JW, Owen-Smith N, Henley SR (2008) Forage selection of sable antelope in Pilanesberg Wildlife Reserve, South Africa. S Afr J Wildl Res 38:35–41
Maloiy G, Rugangazi BM, Clemens ET (2000) Studies about nitrogen metabolism and renal function in the dik-dik antelope (Rhynchotragus kirkii). Small Rumin Res 37:243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4488(00)00122-x
Manser MB, Brotherton PN (1995) Environmental constraints on the foraging behavior of a dwarf antelope (Madoqua kirkii). Oecologia 102:404–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341352
Otieno TO, Goheen JR, Webala PW, Mwangi A, Osuga IM, Ford AT (2019) Human-and risk-mediated browsing pressure by sympatric antelope in an African savanna. Conserv Biol 232:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.028
Owen-Smith N (1979) Assessing the foraging efficiency of a large herbivore, the kudu. S Afr J Wildl Res 9:102–110
Owen-Smith N, Cooper SM (1987) Assessing food preferences of ungulates by acceptability indices. J Wildl Manag 51:372–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801019
Pérez-Barbería FJ, Gordon IJ, Nores C (2001) Evolutionary transitions among feeding styles and habitats in ungulates. Evol Ecol Res 3:221–230
Ryan SJ, Jordaan W (2005) Activity patterns of African buffalo Syncerus caffer in the Lower Sabie Region, Kruger National Park, South Africa. Koedoe 48:117–124. https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v48i2.98
Skadhauge E, Clemens E, Maloiy GMO (1980) The effects of dehydration on electrolyte concentrations and water content along the large intestine of a small ruminant: the dik-dik antelope. J Comp Physiol B 135:165–173
Tessema ZK, de Boer WF, Baars RMT, Prins HHT (2011) Changes in vegetation structure, herbaceous biomass, and soil nutrients in response to grazing in semi-arid savanna in Ethiopia. J Arid Environ 75:662–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.02.004
Tilson RL, Tilson JW (1986) Population turnover in a monogamous antelope (Madoqua kirkii) in Namibia. J Mamm 67:610–613
Tinley KL (1969) Dik-dik, Madoqua kirkii in South West Africa: notes on distribution, ecology and behaviour. Madoqua 1:7–33
Tomlinson DNS (1980) Seasonal food selection by water buck Kobus ellipsiprymnus in a Rhodesian Game Park. S Afr J Wildl Res 10:22–28
Venter JA, Watson LH (2008) Feeding and habitat use of buffalo (Syncerus caffer caffer) in Nama-Karoo, South Africa. S Afr J Wildl Res 38:42–51. https://doi.org/10.3957/0379-4369-38.1.42
Watson L, Owen-Smith N (2002) Phenological influences on the utilization of woody plants by eland in semi-arid shrub land. Afr J Ecol 40:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0141-6707.2001.00341.x
Watson LH, Owen-Smith N (2000) Diet composition and habitat selection of eland in semi-arid shrubland. Afr J Ecol 38:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2028.2000.00229.x
Acknowledgements
Special acknowledgment goes to the Ethiopian Wildlife Authority for granting permission to carry out the study in the park. Idea wild is appreciated for providing field equipment. Our gratitude goes to the park warden, field assistants, Park scouts, and drivers for their assistance with fieldwork.
Funding
The authors are grateful to the Addis Ababa University, Department of Zoological Sciences, and the biodiversity thematic project for funding the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work is part of a PhD dissertation submitted to the Department of Zoological Sciences of Addis Ababa University.
Appendices
Appendix 1
![figure a](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10344-023-01731-w/MediaObjects/10344_2023_1731_Figa_HTML.jpg)
Plate 1 foraging Salt’s dik-dik (a, b the animal foraging during the wet season; c, d foraging during the dry season; e foraging height of Salt’s dik-dik; f recording the foraging activity)
Appendix 2
N.B, activity budget is calculated for observation time of activity per observation session (out of 100%), but sum up of activity budget exceeded 100% due to activity overlap (for instance, time overlap between ruminating and resting)
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Comparison of seasonal availability of the foraged species revealed insignificant difference for A. senegal (χ2 = 1.4, P = 0.153), while varied availabilities were recorded for A. mellifera (χ2 =5.4, P = 0.051), B. aegyptiaca (χ2 =5.3, P = 0.059), A. oerfota (χ2 = 4.0, P = 0.116), and A. etbaica (χ2 = 8.1, P = 0.074). Unavailability during the dry season feeding quadrat survey led to statistical significance for S. ovate (χ2 =7.2, P = 0.005) and L. trifolia (χ2 = 6.1, P = 0.044).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Geta, S., Bekele, A. Diet composition of Salt’s dik-dik (Madoqua saltiana Blainville, 1816) in Awash National Park, Ethiopia. Eur J Wildl Res 69, 103 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-023-01731-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-023-01731-w