Abstract
Biodiversity is often highest at ecotones. However, edge effects vary among species and the spatial extent has rarely been quantified. Rodents form an important part of the food chain and thus are keystones of the ecosystem. We measured the species richness and abundance of rodents at ecotones between forests and three types of open agricultural biotopes (grasslands, rapeseed fields, and cereal fields) along perpendicular transects. The species richness and relative abundance of rodents were highest at the forest/grassland ecotone where the densities of the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) and the striped field mouse (A. agrarius) were highest. The highest density of the forest-dwelling bank vole (Myodes glareolus) was recorded next to grasslands; however, the abundance of this species increased towards the forest interior. The positive edge effect of ecotones on species richness and total abundance did not exceed 10 m. Our results suggest that maintaining narrow grasslands at the margins of crop fields would strengthen rodent communities at ecotones as well as in adjacent forests.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study will be included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
References
Alejūnas P, Stirkė V (2010) Small mammals in northern Lithuania: species diversity and abundance. Ekologija 56:110–115. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10055-010-0016-6
Andersson M, Erlinge S (1977) Influence of predation on rodent populations. Oikos 29:591–597
Ausden M (2007) Habitat management for conservation: a handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198568728.001.0001
Balestrieri A, Remonti L, Morotti L, Saino N, Prigioni C, Guidali F (2015) Multilevel habitat preferences of Apodemus sylvaticus and Clethrionomys glareolus in an intensively cultivated agricultural landscape. Ethol Ecol Evol 29:38–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2015.1077893
Benedek AM, Sîrbu I (2018) Responses of small mammal communities to environment and agriculture in a rural mosaic landscape. Mamm Biol 90:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.02.008
Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9
Bretagnolle V, Gauffre B, Meiss H, Badenhausser I (2011) The role of grassland areas within arable cropping systems for the conservation of biodiversity at the regional level. In Lemaire G, Hodgson JA, Chabbi A (Eds), Grassland productivity and ecosystem services pp 251–260. Wallingford: CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845938093.0251
Butet A, Leroux ABA (2001) Effects of agriculture development on vole dynamics and conservation of Montagu’s harrier in western French wetlands. Biol Cons 100:289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00033-7
Butet A, Paillat G, Delettre Y (2006) Seasonal changes in small mammal assemblages from field boundaries in an agricultural landscape of western France. Agr Ecosyst Environ 113:364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.008
Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A et al (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148
Díaz S, Fargione J, Chapin FS III, Tilman D (2006) Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol 4:1300–1305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277
Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1325
Dudley N, Alexander S (2017) Agriculture and biodiversity: a review. Biodiversity 18:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2017.1351892
Elmeros M (2006) Food habits of stoats Mustela erminea and weasels Mustela nivalis in Denmark. Acta Theriol 51:179–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192669
Ernoult A, Vialette A, Butet A, Michel N, Rantier Y, Jambon O, Burel F (2012) Grassy strips in their landscape context, their role as new habitat for biodiversity. Agr Ecosyst Environ 166:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.07.004
Ferguson SH (2004) Influence of edge on predator–prey distribution and abundance. Acta Oecologica 25:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2003.12.001
Fischer C, Schröder B (2014) Predicting spatial and temporal habitat use of rodents in a highly intensive agricultural area. Agr Ecosyst Environ 189:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.039
Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T et al (2008) Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett 12:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01255.x
Garibaldi LA, Gemmill-Herren B, D’Annolfo R, Graeub BE, Cunningham SA, Breeze TD (2017) Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security. Trends Ecol Evol 32:68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.001
Garratt CM, Minderman J, Whittingham MJ (2012) Should we stay or should we go now? What happens to small mammals when grass is mown, and the implications for birds of prey. Ann Zool Fenn 49:113–123. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.049.0111
Goldyn B, Hromada M, Surmacki A, Tryjanowski P (2003) Habitat use and diet of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in an agricultural landscape in Poland. Eur J Wildl Res 49:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02189737
Haapakoski M, Ylönen H (2010) Effects of fragmented breeding habitat and resource distribution on behavior and survival of the bank vole (Myodes glareolus). Popul Ecol 52:427–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-010-0193-x
Hanski IK, Fenske TJ, Niemi GJ (1996) Lack of edge effect in nesting success of breeding birds in managed forest landscapes. Auk 113:578–585
Hansson L (1978) Small mammal abundance in relation to environmental variables in three Swedish forest phases. Studia Forestalia Suecica 147:5–40
Heroldovà M, Bryja J, Zejda J, Tkadlec E (2007) Structure and diversity of small mammal communities in agriculture landscape. Agr Ecosyst Environ 120:206–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.09.007
Heroldovà M, Zejda J, Zapletal M, Obdržàlkovà D, Jànovà E, Bryja J, Tkadlec E (2004) Importance of winter rape for small rodents. Plant Soil Environ 50:175–181. https://doi.org/10.17221/4079-PSE
Heske EJ (1995) Mammalian abundances on forest-farm edges versus forest interiors in Southern Illinois: is there an edge effect? J Mammal 76:562–568. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382364
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425
Jacob J, Manson P, Barfknecht R, Fredricks T (2013) Common vole (Microtus arvalis) ecology and management: implications for risk assessment of plant protection products. Pest Manag Sci 70:869–878. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3695
Kark S (2013) Ecotones and ecological gradients. In: R. Leemans (Eds.), Ecological Systems pp. 147–160. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5755-8_9
Kingston SR, Morris DW (2000) Voles looking for an edge: habitat selection across forest ecotones. Can J Zool 78:2174–2183. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-78-12-2174
Kleiber C, Zeileis A (2008) Applied econometrics with R. Springer-Verlag, New York. ISBN 978–0–387–77316–2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AER
Korpimäki E (1984) Population dynamics of birds of prey in relation to fluctuations in small mammal populations in western Finland. Ann Zool Fenn 21:287–293
Kozakiewicz M, Gortat T, Kozakiewicz A, Barkowska M (1999) Effects of habitat fragmenta-tion on four rodent species in a Polish farm landscape. Landscape Ecol 14:391–400. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008070610187
Krauss J, Bommarco R, Guardiola M et al (2010) Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels. Ecol Lett 13:597–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01457.x
Laiolo P, Rolando A (2005) Forest bird diversity and ski-runs: a case of negative edge effect. Anim Conserv 8:9–16
Lidicker WZ (1999) Responses of mammals to habitat edges: an overview. Landscape Ecol 14:333–343. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008056817939
Luczaj L, Sadowska B (1997) Edge effect in different groups of organisms: vascular plant, bryophyte and fungi species richness across a forest-grassland border. Folia Geobotanica Et Phytotaxonomica 32:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02821940
MacDonald DW, Barrett P (1993) Mammals of Britain and Europe. Harper-Collins, London
Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Molnár T (2001) Forest edge and diversity: carabids along forest-grassland transects. Biodivers Conserv 10:287–300. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008967230493
Marsh ACW, Poulton S, Harris S (2001) The yellow-necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis in Britain: status and analysis of factors affecting distribution. Mammal Rev 31:203–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2001.00089.x
Mazzamuto MV, Wauters LA, Preatoni D, Martinoli A (2018) Behavioural and population responses of ground-dwelling rodents to forest edges. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy 29:211–215. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-00119-2018
Menzel MA, Ford WM, Laerm J, Krishon D (1999) Forest to wildlife opening: habitat gradi-ent analysis among small mammals in the southern Appalachians. For Ecol Manage 114:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00353-3
Mills LS (1995) Edge effects and isolation: red-backed voles on forest remnants. Conserv Biol 9:395–403. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9020395.x
Mirski P, Väli Ü (2021) Movements of birds of prey reveal the importance of tree lines, small woods and forest edges in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 36:1409–1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01223-9
Orrock JL, Danielson BJ, Brinkerhoff RJ (2004) Rodent foraging is affected by indirect, but not by direct, cues of predation risk. Behav Ecol 15:433–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh031
Panek M, Hušek J (2014) The effect of oilseed rape occurence on main prey abundance and breeding success of the Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo). Bird Study 61:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2014.969192
Panzacchi M, Linnell JDC, Melis C, Odden M, Odden J, Gorini L, Andersen R (2010) Effect of land-use on small mammal abundance and diversity in a forest-farmland mosaic landscape in south-eastern Norway. For Ecol Manage 259:1536–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.030
Porensky LM, Young TP (2013) Edge‐effect interactions in fragmented and patchy landscapes. Conserv Biol 27:509–519
Pasitschniak-Arts M, Messier F (1998) Effects of edges and habitats on small mammals in a prairie ecosystem. Can J Zool 76:2020–2025. https://doi.org/10.1139/z98-144
Paton PWC (1994) The effect of edge on avian nest success: how strong is the evidence? Conserv Biol 8:17–26
Pe’er G, van Maanen C, Turbé A, Matsinos YG, Kark S (2011) Butterfly diversity at the eco-tone between agricultural and semi-natural habitats across a climatic gradient. Divers Distrib 17:1186–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00795.x
Pollard E, Relton J (1970) Hedges V A study of small mammals in hedges and cultivated fields. J Appl Ecol 7:549–557. https://doi.org/10.2307/2401977
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org (last accessed 01.10.2020)
Robinson RA, Sutherland WJ (2002) Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J Appl Ecol 39:157–176. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00695.x
Ross JA, Matter SF, Roland J (2005) Edge avoidance and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in matrix and non-matrix habitat. Landscape Ecol 20:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-1010-8
R Studio Team (2016) RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio Inc., Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/ (last Accessed 10 Jan 2018).
Šàlek M, Kreisinger J, Sedlàcek F, Albrecht T (2010) Do prey densities determine preferences of mammalian predators for habitat edges in an agricultural landscape? Landsc Urban Plan 98:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.013
Sekgororoane GB, Dilworth TG (1995) Relative abundance, richness, and diversity of small mammals at induced forest edges. Can J Zool 73:1432–1437. https://doi.org/10.1139/z95-168
Sepp K, Mikk M, Mänd M, Truu J (2004) Bumblebee communities as an indicator for landscape monitoring in the agri-environmental programme. Landsc Urban Plan 67:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00037-9
Soga M, Kanno N, Yamaura Y, Koike S (2013) Patch size determines the strength of edge effects on carabid beetle assemblages in urban remnant forests. J Insect Conserv 17:421–428
Stevens SM, Husband TP (1998) The influence of edge on small mammals: evidence from Brazilian Atlantic forest fragments. Biol Cons 85:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00003-2
Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS (2019) Similarity in occupancy of different-sized forest patches by small mammals on clearcuts: conservation implications for red-backed voles and small mustelids. Mammal Research 65:255–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-019-00467-w
Sõber V, Leps M, Kaasik A, Mänd M, Teder T (2020) Forest proximity supports bumblebee species richness and abundance in hemi-boreal agricultural landscape. Agr Ecosyst Environ 298:106961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106961
Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B et al (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057544
Väli Ü, Tõnisalu G (2021) Community- and species-level habitat associations of small mammals in a hemiboreal forest–farmland landscape. Ann Zool Fenn 58:1–11. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.058.0101
van Apeldoorn RC, Oostenbrink WT, van Winden A, van der Zee FF (1992) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus in an agricultural landscape. Oikos 65:265–274
Wiens J (1976) Population responses to patchy environments. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 7:81–120. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.000501
Williams PA, Karl BJ, Bannister P, William GL (2001) Small mammals as potential seed dispersers in New Zealand. Austral Ecol 25:523–532. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01078.x
Williams SE, Marsh H (1998) Changes in small mammal assemblage structure across a rain forest/open forest ecotone. J Trop Ecol 14:18–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467498000157
Acknowledgements
Ulvi Selgis, Kylle Kiristaja and Marilin Mõtlep assisted us during fieldwork. We would also like to thank Tiit Maran and Jaanus Remm for useful recommendations for establishing the methodology for trapping small mammals.
Funding
The study was supported by the NGO Eagle Club and by institutional research funding IUT21-1 at the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, GT and ÜV; methodology, GT and ÜV; formal analysis, ÜV; investigation GT; data curation, GT and ÜV; writing — original draft preparation, GT and ÜV; writing — review & editing, GT and ÜV; visualization, GT and ÜV; project administration, ÜV; funding acquisition, ÜV.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The work was conducted in accordance with relevant national legislation. Animals were live-trapped and released, no experiment was conducted and no approval by an ethics committee was required.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tõnisalu, G., Väli, Ü. Edge effect in rodent populations at the border between agricultural landscapes and forests. Eur J Wildl Res 68, 34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-022-01580-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-022-01580-z