Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantifying the differences in avian attack rates on reptiles between an infrastructure and a control site

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased demand for renewable energy has led to growth in the use of land for electricity generation and associated infrastructure. Land-based wind farms are amongst the commonest generators of renewable energy. To date, most research on the effects of wind farms on wildlife have focussed on birds and bats, with very little work on terrestrial taxa. We hypothesised that widely reported negative effects of wind farms on predatory birds might benefit potential prey species. We focussed on reptiles due to concerns over worldwide declines in this group. We compared avian attack rates on clay model snakes at a site in Caithness UK within a wind farm relative to a control site of the same topography and habitat class, 1 km away, using life-sized clay models of adder Vipera berus, a widespread but declining Palaearctic species. Attack rates at the control site were comparable with similar studies elsewhere in Europe. However, we found that attack rates were lower within wind farm arrays, although several species of bird known to prey on reptiles were observed both within the wind farm and the control site. Therefore, given the high rate of loss to avian predators experienced in reptile reintroduction and reinforcement projects, wind farm sites may offer safe-havens, representing a neglected opportunity in reptile conservation. Grazing by sheep severely offset this benefit, presumably through removal of plant cover which was apparent in those areas of the wind farm where sheep were allowed access; grazing must thus be managed carefully for these benefits to be realised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agha M, Lovich JE, Ennen JR, Augustine B, Arundel TR, Murphy MO, Meyer-Wilkins K, Bjurlin C, Delaney D, Briggs J, Austin M, Madrak S, Price SJ (2015) Turbines and terrestrial vertebrates: variation in tortoise survivorship between a wind energy facility and an adjacent undisturbed wildland area in the desert southwest (USA). Environ Manag 56:332–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Agha M, Smith AL, Lovich JE, Delaney D, Ennen JR, Briggs J, Tennant LA, Puffer SR, Walde A, Arundel TR, Price SJ, Todd BD (2017) Mammalian mesocarnivore visitation at tortoise burrows in a wind farm. J Wildlife Manag 81:1117–1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, TD, Diffendorfer JE, Baerwald EF, Beston JA, Drake D, Hale A, Hein CD, Huso MM, Loss SR, Lovich JE, Strickland MD, Williams K, Winder VL (2019) Impacts to wildlife of wind energy siting and operation in the United States. Iss Ecol. Report No. 21

  • Anderson L, Burgin S (2008) Patterns of bird predation on reptiles in small woodland remnant edges in peri-urban north-western Sydney, Australia. Landsc Ecol 23:1039–1047

    Google Scholar 

  • Andren C (1982) Effect of prey density on reproduction, foraging and other activities in the adder, Vipera berus. Amphibia-Reptilia 3:81–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews KM, Nanjappa P, Riley SP (eds) (2015) Roads and ecological infrastructure: concepts and applications for small animals. JHU Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery R (1993) The relationship between disturbance, respiration rate and feeding in common lizards (Lacerta vivipara). Herp J 3:136–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios L, Rodriguez A (2004) Behavioural and environmental correlates of soaring-bird mortality at on-shore wind turbines. J Appl Ecol 41:72–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW, Fleming PA, Wolfe AK (2017) A different kind of ecological modelling: the use of clay model organisms to explore predator–prey interactions in vertebrates. J Zool 301:251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823

  • Beebee TJ, Griffiths RA (2000) The new naturalist. Amphibians and reptiles. A natural history of the British Herpetofauna. Harper Collins, London, pp 45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner T (2003) Polymorphic clay models of Thamnophis sirtalis suggest patterns of avian predation. Ohio J Sci 103:62–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Boarman WI (2003) Managing a subsidized predator population: reducing common raven predation on desert tortoises. Environ Manag 32:205–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie E (1993) Differential avoidance of coral snake banded patterns by free-ranging avian predators in Costa Rica. Evolution 47:227–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley LB, Jetz W (2007) Insularity and the determinants of lizard population density. Ecol Lett 10:481–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01042.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (1998) Antipredator behaviour of hatchling snakes: effects of incubation temperature and simulated predators. Anim Behav 56:547–553

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S, Perrins CM (eds) (1994) The birds of the Western Palearctic vol. 8. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S, Simmons KEL (eds) (1979) The birds of the Western Palearctic vol. 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lucas M, Perrow MR (2017) Birds: collision. Wildlife and wind farms-conflicts and solutions, volume 1: onshore: potential effects. Pelagic, Exeter, pp 155–191

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lucas M, Janss GF, Whitfield DP, Ferrer M (2008) Collision fatality of raptors in wind farms does not depend on raptor abundance. J Appl Ecol 45:1695–1703

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewitt AL, Langston RH (2006) Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds. Ibis 148:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2009) Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32009L0028. Accessed 17th August 2019

  • Evans DM, Redpath SM, Elston DA, Evans SA, Mitchell RJ, Dennis P (2006) To graze or not to graze? Sheep, voles, forestry and nature conservation in the British uplands. J Appl Ecol 43:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01158.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everaert J, Stienen E (2007) Impact of wind turbines on birds in Zeebrugge (Belgium). Biodivers Conserv 16:3345–3359

    Google Scholar 

  • Farallo V, Forstner M (2012) Predation and the maintenance of color polymorphism on a habitat specialist squamate. PLoS One 7:e30316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer M, de Lucas M, Janss GF, Casado E, Munoz AR, Bechard MJ, Calabuig CP (2012) Weak relationship between risk assessment studies and recorded mortality in wind farms. J Appl Ecol 49:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin JC, Jennelle CS, Drake D, Grodsky SM (2011) Response of raptors to a windfarm. J Appl Ecol 48:199–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01912.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons J, Scott D, Ryan T, Buhlmann K, Tuberville T, Metts B, Winne C (2000) The global decline of reptiles, Deja Vu Amphibians. BioScience 50:653–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham IM, Redpath SM, Thirgood SJ (1995) The diet and breeding density of common buzzards Buteo buteo in relation to indices of prey abundance. Bird Study 42:165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern B (2014) Final report on LIFE project conservation of Hungarian meadow viper (Vipera ursinii rakosiensis) in the Carpathian-basin. EU-LIFE. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.showFile&rep=file&fil=LIFE07_NAT_H_000322_FTR.pdf. Accessed 11/09/2018

  • Halpern B, Péchy T, Somlai T, Dankovics R, Sós E, Walzer C (2017) Survival, area use and thermoregulation of reintroduced Hungarian meadow vipers (Vipera ursinii rakosiensis). 19th European Congress of Herpetology, Salzburg, Austria. 18-23 September

  • Hansen NA, Sato CF, Michael DR, Lindenmayer DB, Driscoll DA (2019) Predation risk for reptiles is highest at remnant edges in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 56:31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris S, Yalden DW (eds) (2008) Mammals of the British Isles: handbook, vol 106. Mammal society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton-Taylor C, Jonathan B, Stuart S (2004) 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species: a global species assessment. IUCN. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9830. Accessed 08/12/2018

  • Hötker H (2017) Birds: displacement. In: Perrow (ed) Wildlife and wind farms-conflicts and solutions, volume 1: onshore: potential effects. Pelagic, Exeter, pp 119–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Hötker H, Dürr T (2017) Lessons from the wind turbine collision register in Germany. In: Perrow (ed) Wildlife and wind farms-conflicts and solutions, volume 1: onshore: potential effects. Pelagic, Exeter, pp 161–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt G, Hunt T (2006) The trend of Golden eagle territory occupancy in the vicinity of the Altamont pass wind resource area: 2005 survey. California Energy Commission. http://www.westernsunsystems.comorwww.gosolarcalifornia.org/2006publications/CEC-500-2006-056/CEC-500-2006-056.PDF

  • IPBES (2019) Global assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • JNCC (2010) UK priority species data collation: Vipera berus version 2, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Available: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/_speciespages/2695.pdf

  • Keehn JE, Feldman CR (2018) Predator attack rates and anti-predator behavior of side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana) at Southern California wind farms, USA. Herpetol Conserv Biol 13:194–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Keehn JE, Shoemaker KT, Feldman CR (2019) Population-level effects of wind farms on a desert lizard. J Wildlife Manag 83:145–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2016) lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-33. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTes

  • Laurance WF (2018) Conservation and the global infrastructure tsunami: disclose, debate, delay! Trends Ecol Evol 33(8):568–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Blanchard W, Crane M, Michael D, Sato C (2018) Biodiversity benefits of vegetation restoration are undermined by livestock grazing. Restor Ecol 26:1157–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovich JE, Daniels R (2000) Environmental characteristics of desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) burrow locations in an altered industrial landscape. Chelonian Conserv Bi 3:714–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovich JE, Ennen JR (2017) Reptiles and amphibians. In: Perrow MR (ed) Wildlife and wind farms-conflicts and solutions, volume 1: onshore: potential effects. Pelagic, Exeter, pp 97–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovich JE, Ennen JR, Madrak S, Meyer K, Loughran C, Bjurlin C, Arundel T, Turner W, Jones C, Groenendaal GM (2011) Effects of wind energy production on growth, demography and survivorship of a desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) population in southern California with comparisons to natural populations. Herpetol Conserv Biol 6:161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovich JE, Yackulic CB, Freilich J, Agha M, Austin M, Meyer KP, Arundel TR, Hansen J, Vamstad MS, Root SA (2014) Climatic variation and tortoise survival: has a desert species met its match? Biol Conserv 169:214–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclagan SJ, Coates T, Ritchie EG (2018) Don't judge habitat on its novelty: assessing the value of novel habitats for an endangered mammal in a peri-urban landscape. Biol Conserv 223:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, Lopez P (1996) Avian predation on a large lizard (Lacerta lepida) found at Low population densities in Mediterranean habitats: an analysis of bird diets. Copeia 3:772–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle M (2015) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c)

  • McClure CJ, Westrip JR, Johnson JA, Schulwitz SE, Virani MZ, Davies R, Symes A, Wheatley H, Thorstrom R, Amar A, Buij R (2018) State of the world's raptors: distributions, threats, and conservation recommendations. Biol Conserv 227:390–402

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerny C, Minting P (2016) Amphibians and reptiles of Scotland. Glasgow Natural History Society, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiri S, Bauer AM, Allison A, Castro-Herrera F, Chirio L, Colli G, Das I, Doan TM, Glaw F, Grismer LL, Hoogmoed M (2018) Extinct, obscure or imaginary: the lizard species with the smallest ranges. Divers Distrib 24:262–273

    Google Scholar 

  • NBN (2018) https://nbnatlas.org/. Accessed 8 April 2018

  • Neumeyer R (1987) Density and seasonal movements of the adder (Vipera berus L. 1758) in a subalpine environment. Amphibia-Reptilia 8:259–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce-Higgins JW, Stephen L, Langston RH, Bainbridge IP, Bullman R (2009) The distribution of breeding birds around upland wind farms. J Appl Ecol 46:1323–1331

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow MR (ed) (2017) Wildlife and wind farms-conflicts and solutions, volume 1: onshore: potential effects. Pelagic, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestt I (1971) An ecological study of the viper (Vipera berus) in southern Britain. J Zool Lond 164:373–418

    Google Scholar 

  • R core team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna https://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin LA, Coss RG, Owings DH (2006) The effects of wind turbines on antipredator behavior in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi). Biol Conserv 131:410–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall JA, Matocq MD (1997) Why do kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) footdrum at snakes? Behav Ecol 8:404–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Reading C, Luiselli LM, Akani GC, Bonnet X, Amori G, Ballouard JM, Rugiero L (2010) Are snake populations in widespread decline? Biol Lett 6:777–780. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reidar VS, Tveiten R, Aanonsen OM (2007) Diet of common buzzards (Buteo buteo) in southern Norway determined from prey remains and video recordings. Ornis Fennica 84:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotem G, Gavish Y, Shacham B, Giladi I, Bouskila A, Ziv Y (2016) Combined effects of climatic gradient and domestic livestock grazing on reptile community structure in a heterogeneous agroecosystem. Oecologia 180:231–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salo P, Banks PB, Dickman CR, Korpimaki E (2010) Predator manipulation experiments: impacts on populations of terrestrial vertebrate prey. Ecol Monogr 80:531–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Zapata JA, Clavero M, Carrete M, DeVault TL, Hermoso V, Losada MA, Polo MJ, Sánchez-Navarro S, Pérez-García JM, Botella F, Ibáñez C (2016) Effects of renewable energy production and infrastructure on wildlife. Current Trends in Wildlife Research:97–123

  • Santos M, Bastos R, Travassos P, Bessa R, Repas M, Cabral JA (2010) Predicting the trends of vertebrate species richness as a response to wind farms installation in mountain ecosystems of Northwest Portugal. Ecol Indic 10:192–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott R (2011) Atlas of Highland land mammals. Highland Biological Recording Group, Inverness

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen R, Low LM, Sonerud GA (2011) Delivery of common lizards (Zootoca (Lacerta) vivipara) to nests of Eurasian kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) determined by solar height and ambient temperature. Can J Zool 89:199–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart GB, Pullin AS, Cole CF (2005) Effects of wind turbines on bird abundance. CEE review 04-002 (SR4). Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. www.environmentalevidence.org/SR4.html

  • Tapia L, Dominguez J, Romeu M (2007) Diet of common buzzard (Buteo buteo) (Linnaeus, 1758) in an area of North-Western Spain as assessed by direct observation from blinds. Nova Acta Ci Compostelana Secc Biol 16:145–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaker M, Zambre A, Bhosale H (2018) Wind farms have cascading impacts on ecosystems across trophic levels. Nat Ecol Evol 2:1854–1858

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torres A, Jaeger JA, Alonso JC (2016) Assessing large-scale wildlife responses to human infrastructure development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:8472–8477

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • UN Sustainable Development Goal 9 (2019) https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg9. Accessed 17th August 2019

  • Val J, Travers SK, Oliver I, Koen TB, Eldridge DJ (2019) Recent grazing reduces reptile richness but historic grazing filters reptiles based on their functional traits. J Appl Ecol 56:833–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkonen J, Niskanen M, Bjorklund M, Mappes J (2011) Disruption or aposematism? Significance of dorsal zigzag pattern of European vipers. Evol Ecol 25:1047–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9463-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb JK, Whiting MJ (2005) Why don't small snakes bask? Juvenile broad-headed snakes trade thermal benefits for safety. Oikos 110:515–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler P (2008) Effects of sheep grazing on abundance and predators of field vole (Microtus agrestis) in upland Britain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 123:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield DP, Fielding AH, McLeod DRA, Haworth PF (2004) Modelling the effects of persecution on the population dynamics of Golden eagles in Scotland. Biol Conserv 119:319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson JW, Arnell AP (2013) NARRS report 2007–2012: establishing the baseline (HWM Edition). ARC Research Report. http://narrs.org.uk/documents/NARRS%20Report%202007-2012.pdf

  • Wüster W, Allum CS, Bjargardottir IB, Bailey KL, Dawson KJ, Lewis J, Pollard CP (2004) Do aposematism and Batesian mimicry require bright colours? A test, using European viper markings. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:2495–2499. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young BA (2003) Snake Bioacustics: towards a richer understanding of the behavioural ecology of snakes. Q Rev Biol 78:303–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young BA, Aguiar A (2002) Response of western diamondback rattlesnakes Crotalus atrox to airborne sounds. J Exp Biol 205:3087–3092

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Bob Furness for his comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript, and the staff of Camster Wind Farm for their cooperation. Two anonymous reviewers provided comments that greatly improved the text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David O’Brien.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Road Ecology

Guest Editor: Marcello D’Amico

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Law, C., Lancaster, L., Hall, J. et al. Quantifying the differences in avian attack rates on reptiles between an infrastructure and a control site. Eur J Wildl Res 66, 54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-020-01393-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-020-01393-y

Keywords

Navigation