The role of forest canopy cover in habitat selection: insights from the Iberian lynx
Habitat selection models for woodland species usually consider forest attributes derived from land cover maps, such as an area covered by forests or distance to forest edge, but canopy cover is less frequently used as a predictor. We evaluated the effect of including forest canopy cover data in habitat selection models for woodland species using the endangered Iberian lynx as a case study. We considered four canopy cover classes for both conifer and broadleaved forests, together with other land cover predictors, and analyzed a large telemetry (GPS-GSM collars) dataset. The model that included forest canopy cover outperformed, both in predictive power and in conservation management insights, the model that only used forest area. The effect of forest canopy cover on lynx habitat selection was especially strong for broadleaved forests; an increased tree cover in these forests consistently translated into significantly lower selection probabilities. Open broadleaved forests were found to clearly be the most preferred habitat. By contrast, the habitat model without canopy cover data indicated that broadleaved forests were significantly less preferred than shrublands and mountain olive groves, which may mislead conservation management actions. We conclude that habitat selection models for woodland species should consider forest canopy cover as a relevant candidate predictor as it can capture important factors influencing habitat use, such as understory vegetation abundance or prey availability. Recent developments on remote sensing technologies will increase the availability of spatially continuous information on canopy cover, facilitating a more widespread use of vegetation structural variables in habitat modeling and hence improving the conservation planning value of these models.
KeywordsResource selection functions Habitat suitability Forest structure Mammal carnivores Iberian lynx Woodland conservation management
We thank all the staff of the LIFE projects involved in lynx collaring and tracking from 2009 to 2015.
Funding was provided by the LIFE+ Iberlince project (LIFE10NAT/ES/000570), the DIABOLO project (funded by the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme under grant agreement no. 633464), and the Woodnet project (ERA-Net BiodivERsA, with the national funder Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, reference PCIN-2016-042).
- Gastón A, Ciudad C, Mateo-Sánchez MC, Garcia-Vinas JI, López-Leiva C, Fernández-Landa A, Marchamalo M, Cuevas J, de la Fuente B, Fortin M, Saura S (2017) Species’ habitat use inferred from environmental variables at multiple scales: how much we gain from high-resolution vegetation data? Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 55:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gil-Sánchez J, Arenas-Rojas R, García-Tardío M, Rodríguez-Siles J (2011) Habitat assessment to select areas for reintroduction of the endangered Iberian lynx. Wildl Biol 7(2):1–19Google Scholar
- LIFE+ Iberlince (2017) Censo de las poblaciones de lince ibérico: año 2016. Boletín Gato Clavo, Especial Censo 2016. Available at: www.iberlince.eu. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
- Manly B, McDonald L, Thomas D, McDonald T, Erickson W (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical analysis and design for field studies. Nordrecht. Kluwer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Molinari-Jobin A, Kéry M, Marboutin E, Marucco F, Zimmermann F, Molinari P, Frick H, Fuxjäger C, Wölfl S, Bled F, Breitenmoser-Würsten C, Kos I, Wölfl M, Černe R, Müller O, Breitenmoser U (2017) Mapping range dynamics from opportunistic data: spatiotemporal modelling of the lynx distribution in the Alps over 21 years. Anim Conserv 21(2):168–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Version 3.4.3. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
- Ribatet M (2011) POT: generalized Pareto distribution and peaks over threshold. R package. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/POT/index.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
- Roberts DR, Bahn V, Ciuti S, Boyce MS, Elith J, Guillera-Arroita G, Hauenstein S, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Schröder B, Thuiller W, Warton DI, Wintle BA, Hartig F, Dormann CF (2017) Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography 40(8):913–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- San Miguel A (2007) Manual para la gestión del hábitat del lince ibérico (Lynx pardinus) y de su presa principal, el conejo de monte (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Fundación CBD-Hábitat, MadridGoogle Scholar
- Sexton JO, Song X, Feng M, Noojipady P, Anand A, Huang C, Kim D, Collins KM, Channan S, DiMiceli C (2013) Global, 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: Landsat-based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidar-based estimates of error. Int J Digit Earth 6(5):427–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simón MA (2013) Ten years conserving the Iberian lynx. Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla, SpainGoogle Scholar