Hunters’ preferences for engaging in control programs of introduced Eastern cottontails in Italy: a factorial survey approach

  • Jacopo Cerri
  • Giovanni Batisti
  • Marco Ferretti
  • Marco Zaccaroni
  • Sandro Bertolino
Original Article


In Europe, invasive alien mammals are often controlled by voluntary hunters. However, no research investigated if control operations could be entirely performed by volunteers, nor how to maximize their recruitment. By using the Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) in Central Italy as a case study, we carried out a factorial survey over a sample of hunters (n = 134), exploring which attributes influenced their hypothetical participation to control programs for cottontails. Hunters were more willing to engage in control schemes if these included shooting sessions, not trapping. Moreover, they would have been more prone to control cottontails if they had received evidence of cottontail impacts over native wildlife or local crops. The geographical scale of the management plan and its goals and required efforts did not have any effect over the evaluation of management scenarios. As many European control schemes for invasive alien mammals are carried out in contexts where shooting is unfeasible, like urbanized neighborhoods, our findings show that agencies cannot entirely rely on volunteers and they should complement their limitations with full-time staff. Moreover, if wildlife agencies want to recruit volunteers, they should provide adequate information about the environmental and social impacts of invasive alien mammals.


Invasive mammals Biological invasions Sylvilagus floridanus Factorial surveys Human-dimensions Hunters 

Supplementary material

10344_2018_1181_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (103 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 102 kb)


  1. Auspurg K, Hinz T (2014) Factorial survey experiments, In: Series: quantitative applications in the social sciences, vol 175. Thousand Oaks, Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrios-Garcia MN, Ballari SA (2012) Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biol Invasions 14:2283–2300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartoń K (2013) MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.9. 13.
  4. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version, 1(7).
  5. Bertolino S, Viterbi R (2010) Long-term cost-effectiveness of coypu (Myocastor coypus) control in piedmont (Italy). Biol Invasions 12:2549–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertolino S, Cordero di Montezemolo N, Perrone A (2011a) Daytime habitat selection by introduced eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) and native European hare (Lepus europaeus) in northern Italy. Zool Sci 28:414–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertolino S, Perrone A, Gola L, Viterbi R (2011b) Population density and habitat use of introduced eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) in comparison with the native European hare (Lepus europaeus). Zool Stud 50:315–326Google Scholar
  8. Bertolino S, Cordero di Montezemolo N, Perrone A (2013) Habitat use of coexisting introduced eastern cottontail and native European hare. Mamm Biol 78:235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capizzi D, Bertolino S, Mortelliti A (2014) Rating the rat: global patterns and research priorities in impacts and management of rodent pests. Mammal Rev 44:148–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerri J, Ferretti M, Tricarico E (2016) Are you aware of what you are doing? Asking Italian hunters about an invasive alien species they are introducing. J Nat Conserv 34:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cerri J, Ferretti M, Bertolino S (2017) Rabbits killing hares: an invasive mammal modifies native predator–prey dynamics. Anim Conserv 20:511–519. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Courchamp F, Fournier A, Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Bonnaud E, Jeschke JM, Russell JC (2017) Invasion biology: specific problems and possible solutions. Trends Ecol Evol 32:13–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowan P, Warburton B (2011) Animal welfare and ethical issues in island pest eradication. In: Veitch CR, Cloud MN, Towns DR (eds) Island invasives: eradication and management, in Proceedings of the international conference on Island invasives. IUCN, Gland and Auckland, pp 418–421Google Scholar
  14. DiTomaso JM, Van Steenwyk RA, Nowierski RM, Vollmer JL, Lane E, Chilton E, Burch PL et al (2017) Enhancing the effectiveness of biological control programs of invasive species through a more comprehensive pest management approach. Pest Manag Sci 73:9–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dubois S, Fenwick N, Ryan EA, Baker L, Baker SE, Beausoleil NJ, Carter S, Cartwright B, Costa F, Draper C, Griffin J, Grogan A, Howald G, Jones B, Littin KE, Lombard AT, Mellor DJ, Ramp D, Schuppli CA, Fraser D (2017) International consensus principles for ethical wildlife control. Conserv Biol 31:753–760. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dülmer H (2007) Experimental plans in factorial surveys: random or quota design? Sociol Methods Res 35:382–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dülmer H (2016) The factorial survey: design selection and its impact on reliability and internal validity. Sociol Methods Res 45:304–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eggleston JE, Rixecker SS, Hickling GJ (2003) The role of ethics in the management of New Zealand's wild mammals. N Z J Zool 30:361–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Estévez RA, Anderson CB, Pizarro JC, Burgman MA (2015) Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management. Conserv Biol 29(1):19–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ford-Thompson AE, Snell C, Saunders G, White PC (2012) Stakeholder participation in management of invasive vertebrates. Conserv Biol 26:345–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, González JA, Alcorlo P, Montes C (2008) Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: implications for management. Biol Conserv 141:2969–2983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gurnell J, Lurz P, Bertoldi W (2014) The changing patterns in the distribution of red and grey squirrels in the North of England and Scotland between 1991 and 2010 based on volunteer surveys. Hystrix 25:83–89Google Scholar
  23. Hartig F (2016) DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package version 0.1. 0.
  24. Holmes ND, Campbell KJ, Keitt BS, Griffiths R, Beek J, Donlan CJ, Broome KG (2015) Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications. Biol Invasions 17:2913–2925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hox JJ, Moerbeek M, Van de Schoot R (2010) Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Routledge, Abingdon-on-ThamesGoogle Scholar
  26. Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis MA, Lamberti G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:2407–2413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liordos V, Kontsiotis VJ, Georgari M, Baltzi K, Baltzi I (2017) Public acceptance of management methods under different human–wildlife conflict scenarios. Sci Total Environ 579:685–693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Littin KE, Mellor DJ, Warburton B, Eason CT (2004) Animal welfare and ethical issues relevant to the humane control of vertebrate pests. N Z Vet J 52:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Massei G, Kindberg J, Licoppe A, Gačić D, Šprem N, Kamler J, Baubet E, Hohmann U, Monaco A, Ozoliņš J, Cellina S, Podgórski T, Fonseca C, Markov N, Pokorny B, Rosell C, Náhlik A (2015) Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Manag Sci 71:492–500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McNeely JA (2001) The great reshuffling: human dimensions of invasive alien species, ed. McNeely JA, vi + 242 pp. IUCN, Gland and CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nimmo DG, Miller KK (2007) Ecological and human dimensions of management of feral horses in Australia: a review. Wildlife Res 34:408–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Owens B (2017) The big cull. Nature 541:148–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Parker H, Nummi P, Hartman G, Rosell F (2012) Invasive North American beaver Castor canadensis in Eurasia: a review of potential consequences and a strategy for eradication. Wildlife Biol 18:354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parkes JP, Panetta FD (2009) Eradication of invasive species: progress and emerging issues in the 21st century. In: Clout MN, Williams PA (ed) Invasive species management. A handbook of principles and techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 47–60Google Scholar
  36. Parkes JP, Nugent , Forsyth DM, Byrom AE, Pech RP, Warburton B, Choquenot D (2017) Past, present and two potential futures for managing New Zealand’s mammalian pests. New Zeal J Ecol 41: 151-161.
  37. Pejchar L, Mooney HA (2009) Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol Evol 24:497–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pimentel D (2011) Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal, and microbe species. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pluess T, Jarošík V, Pyšek P, Cannon R, Pergl J, Breukers A, Bacher S (2012) Which factors affect the success or failure of eradication campaigns against alien species? PLoS One 7:e48157CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  41. Robertson PA, Adriaens T, Lambin X, Mill A, Roy S, Shuttleworth CM, Sutton-Croft M (2017) The large-scale removal of mammalian invasive alien species in Northern Europe. Pest Manag Sci 73:273–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Santo AR, Sorice MG, Donlan CJ, Franck CT, Anderson CB (2015) A human-centered approach to designing invasive species eradication programs on human-inhabited islands. Glob Environ Chang 35:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saunders GR, Gentle MN, Dickman CR (2010) The impacts and management of foxes Vulpes vulpes in Australia. Mammal Rev 40:181–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stien J, Hausner VH (2017) Motivating and engaging volunteer hunters to control the invasive alien American mink Neovison vison in Norway. Oryx 52:186–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tollington S, Turbe A, Rabitsch W, Groombridge JJ, Scalera R, Essl F, Shwartz A (2017) Making the EU legislation on invasive species a conservation success. Conserv Lett 10:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Travis JM, Park KJ (2004) Spatial structure and the control of invasive alien species. Anim Conserv 7:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Treves A, Naughton-Treves L (2005) Evaluating lethal control in the management of human-wildlife conflict. In: Woodroffe R, Thirgood S, Rabinowitz A (eds) People and wildlife, conflict or co-existence? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 86–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vidus-Rosin A, Meriggi A, Cardarelli E, Serrano-Perez S, Mariani MC, Corradelli C, Barba A (2011) Habitat overlap between sympatric European hares (Lepus europaeus) and eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus) in northern Italy. Acta Theriol 56:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vilà M, Hulme PE (2017) Non-native species, ecosystem services, and human well-being. In: Vilà M, Hulme PE (eds) Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services. Springer International Publishing, New York, pp 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wallander L (2009) 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: a review. Soc Sci Res 38:505–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams SC, Short MR (2014) Evaluation of eight repellents in deterring eastern cottontail herbivory in Connecticut. Hum Wildl Interact 8:113Google Scholar
  52. Witmer GW, Burke PW, Pitt WC, Avery ML (2007) Management of invasive vertebrates in the United States: an overview. Managing vertebrate invasive species: an international symposium, Fort Collins, Colorado, p 127–137. Accessed 21 March 2018
  53. Zanet S, Palese V, Trisciuoglio A, Alonso CC, Ferroglio E (2013) Encephalitozoon cuniculi, Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum infection in invasive eastern cottontail rabbits Sylvilagus floridanus in Northwestern Italy. Vet Parasitol 197:682–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istituto di ManagementScuola Superiore Sant’AnnaPisaItaly
  2. 2.Scuola di AgrariaUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.Regione ToscanaPistoiaItaly
  4. 4.Dipartimento di BiologiaUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeSesto FiorentinoItaly
  5. 5.Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Biologia dei SistemiUniversità degli Studi di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations