Do roe deer react to wildlife warning reflectors? A test combining a controlled experiment with field observations

  • Falko Brieger
  • Robert Hagen
  • Max Kröschel
  • Florian Hartig
  • Imke Petersen
  • Sylvia Ortmann
  • Rudi Suchant
Original Article

Abstract

Millions of animals are killed by vehicle collisions each year. As mitigation measures, wildlife warning reflectors have become increasingly popular, although clear evidence for their effectiveness is lacking. A reason for inconclusive results in the literature may be that most previous studies on the effectiveness of wildlife warning reflectors compare animal-vehicle collision rates with and without reflectors, a setting characterised by low event rates and weak experimental control. Animal behaviour can be expected to provide a more direct evidence for a possible effect of reflectors. In this study, we analyse roe deer behaviour in the presence of a blue semicircle reflector, one of the most frequently applied wildlife warning reflectors in Germany and other parts of Europe. Behavioural response to these reflectors (classified as no reaction, vigilance, short-distance flight and long-distance flight) was recorded both under controlled experimental conditions with captive roe deer and for free-ranging roe deer at road sections with traffic occurrence. We used generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs) to test if reflector presence induced threat-related behaviour (vigilance, flight) and movement away from the reflectors. We found no significant evidence that the light stimulus emitted by reflectors was perceived as a threat or induced evasive movement. We conclude that our study provides no evidence that blue semicircle reflectors induce behaviour in roe deer that seems suitable to reduce roe deer-vehicle collisions.

Keywords

Deer-vehicle collision Thermal network camera Road ecology Capreolus capreolus Experimental design Enclosure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the federal state of Baden-Württemberg (Landesjagdabgabe) and was conducted with animal ethics approval. Falko Brieger was supported with a PhD Scholarship by the foundation ‘Dr. Joachim und Hanna Schmidt Stiftung für Umwelt und Verkehr’. Grateful thanks to Silja Spiecker for field assistants and screening video data in the lab as well as Valerie von Schultzendorff, Virginia Lorek, Jim-Lino Kämmerle and Leonie Cullmann for screening video data. We thank all participating work colleagues and hunters as well the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research for supporting our experimental study. Grateful thanks to the staff at the Field Research Station in Niederfinow/Germany. We thank two anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

“All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.”

Supplementary material

10344_2017_1130_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.9 mb)
ESM 1(DOCX 2.90 MB).

References

  1. Ahnelt PK, Schubert C, Kübber-Heiss A et al (2006) Independent variation of retinal S and M cone photoreceptor topographies: a survey of four families of mammals. Vis Neurosci 23:429–435. doi:10.1017/S095252380623342X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–266. doi:10.1163/156853974X00534 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–14. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  4. Benítez-López A, Alkemade R, Verweij PA (2010) The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 143:1307–1316. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg Werbetechnik (2017) Wir haben etwas gegen Wildtiere: Wildwarnreflektoren http://berg-werbetechnik.de/leistungen/wildwarnreflektoren.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2017
  6. Blackwell BF, Seamans TW (2009) Enhancing the perceived threat of vehicle approach to deer. J Wildl Manag 73:128–135. doi:10.2193/2008-014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackwell BF, Seamans TW, DeVault TL (2014) White-tailed deer response to vehicle approach: evidence of unclear and present danger. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109988
  8. Brieger F, Hagen R, Vetter D et al (2016) Effectiveness of light-reflecting devices: a systematic reanalysis of animal-vehicle collision data. Accid Anal Prev 97:242–260. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen RHB (2015) ordinal—regression models for ordinal data. Http://Www.Cran.R-Project.Org/Package=Ordinal/
  10. Conover MR, Pitt WC, Kessler KK et al (1995) Review of human injuries, illnesses, and economic losses caused by wildlife in the United States. Wildl Soc Bull 23:407–414. doi:10.2307/3782947 Google Scholar
  11. D’Angelo GJ, D’Angelo JG, Gallagher GR et al (2006) Evaluation of wildlife warning reflectors for altering white-tailed deer behavior along roadways. Wildl Soc Bull 34:1175–1183. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1175:eowwrf]2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeVault TL, Blackwell BF, Seamans TW et al (2015) Speed kills: ineffective avian escape responses to oncoming vehicles. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20142188. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fahrig L, Rytwinski T (2009) Effects of roads on animal abundance: an empirical review and synthesis. Ecol Soc 14:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e.V. (GDV) (2016) Wildunfälle erreichen Höchststand – alle zwei Minuten kracht es http://www.gdv.de/2016/11/wildunfaelle-erreichen-hoechststand-alle-zwei-minuten-kracht-es/. Accessed 11 Nov 2016
  15. Gladfelter L (1984) Effect of wildlife highway warning reflectors on deer-vehicle accidents. Project HR-210. Iowa Department of Transportation, Boone, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Grenier RH (2002) A study of the effectiveness of Strieter-Lite® wild animal highway warning reflector systems. Comm Rep Strieter Corp 20Google Scholar
  17. Grilo C, Zanchetta Ferreira F, Revilla E (2015) No evidence of a threshold in traffic volume affecting road-kill mortality at a large spatio-temporal scale. Environ Impact Assess Rev 55:54-58Google Scholar
  18. Hothorn T, Brandl R, Müller J (2012) Large-scale model-based assessment of deer-vehicle collision risk. PLoS One 7:10. doi:10.1371/Citation CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huijser MP, Duffield JW, Clevenger AP et al (2009) Cost-benefit analyses of mitigation measures aimed at reducing collisions with large ungulates in the United States and Canada: a decision support tool. Ecol Soc 14(2):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huijser MP, Mosler-Berger C, Olsson M, Strein M (2015) Wildlife warning signs and animal detection systems aimed at reducing wildlife-vehicle collisions. Handb Road Ecol 198–212. doi: 10.1002/9781118568170.ch24
  21. Husby A, Husby M (2014) Interspecific analysis of vehicle avoidance behavior in birds. Behav Ecol 25:504–508. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knapp KK, Yi X, Oakasa T, Thimm W (2004) Deer-vehicle crash countermeasure toolbox: a decision and choice resource. Report No. DVCIC – 02, Midwest Regional University Transportation Center, Deer-Vehicle Crash Information Clearinghouse, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Krop-Benesch A, Berger A, Hofer H, Heurich M (2013) Long-term measurement of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) (Mammalia: Cervidae) activity using two-axis accelerometers in GPS-collars. Ital J Zool 80:69–81. doi:10.1080/11250003.2012.725777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langbein J, Putman R, Pokorny B (2011) Traffic collisions involving deer and other ungulates in Europe and available measures for mitigation. In: Putman R, Apollonio M, Andersen R (eds) Ungulate management in Europe: problems and practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 215–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leblond M, Dussault C, Ouellet J-P (2013) Avoidance of roads by large herbivores and its relation to disturbance intensity. J Zool 289:32–40. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00959.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee E, Croft DB, Ramp D (2010) 26 Flight response as a causative factor in kangaroo-vehical collisions. Macropods Biol kangaroos, wallabies rat-kangaroos:301–311Google Scholar
  27. Lima SL, Blackwell BF, Devault TL, Fernández-Juricic E (2015) Animal reactions to oncoming vehicles: a conceptual review. Biol Rev 90:60–76. doi:10.1111/brv.12093 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin PR, Bateson P (2009) Measuring behaviour—an introductory guide, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Morelle К, Lehaire F, Lejeune P (2013) Spatio-temporal patterns of wildlife-vehicle collisions in a region with a high-density road network. Nat Conserv 5:53–73. doi:10.3897/natureconservation.5.4634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mupepele AC, Walsh JC, Sutherland WJ, Dormann CF (2016) An evidence assessment tool for ecosystem services and conservation studies. Ecol Appl 26:1295–1301. doi:10.1101/010140 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nowakowski C, Sharafsaleh M a., Huijser MP (2013) Preliminary evaluation of drivers’ responses to a roadside animal warning system. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 57:1953–1957. doi: 10.1177/1541931213571436
  32. Pafko F, Kovach B (1996) Experience with deer reflectors. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of Environmental ServicesGoogle Scholar
  33. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found. Stat. Comput, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramp D, Croft DB (2006) Do wildlife warning reflectors elicit aversion in captive macropods? Wildl Res 33:583–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reeve AF, Anderson SH (1993) Ineffectiveness of Swareflex reflectors at reducing deer-vehicle collisions. Wildl Soc Bull 21:127–132Google Scholar
  36. Riginos C, Graham MW, Davis M, et al (2015) Effects of wildlife warning reflectors (“deer delineators”) on wildlife-vehicle collisions in central Wyoming. Final Report, No. FHWA-WY-15/03F. Wyoming Department of Transportation, Cheyenne, WY, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. Roedenbeck IAE (2007) Landscape-scale effects of roads on wildlife. Dissertation, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, GiessenGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogers EI, Premo DB (2004) An ecological landscape study of deer-vehicle collisions in Kent County, Michigan. Report for the Michigan State Police, Office of Highway Safety and Planning. White Water Associates, Inc., Amasa, MI 49903Google Scholar
  39. Rytwinski T, Soanes K, Jaeger JAG et al (2016) How effective is road mitigation at reducing road-kill? A meta-analysis. PLoS One 11:e0166941. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166941 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Schafer JA, Penland ST (1985) Effectiveness of Swareflex reflectors in reducing deer-vehicle accidents. J Wildl Manag 49:774–776. doi:10.2307/3801710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schilderwerk Beutha (2017) Blue semicircle reflectors folder http://www.halbkreisreflektor.de/. Accessed 28 Jan 2017
  42. Schiviz AN, Ruf T, Kuebber-Heiss A et al (2008) Retinal cone topography of artiodactyl mammals: influence of body height and habitat. J Comp Neurol 507:1336–1350. doi:10.1002/cne.21626 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schulze C, Polster, J-U (2017) Wirkungsweise von Wildwarnern. Heft 1127/2017. 96p. In: Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik. Hrsg: Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur.Google Scholar
  44. Schwabe KA, Schuhmann PW (2002) Deer-vehicle collisions and deer value: an analysis of competing literatures. Wildl Soc Bull 30:609–615Google Scholar
  45. Schwabe KA, Schuhmann PW, Tonkovich MJ, Wu E (1999) An analysis of deer-vehicle collisions: the case of Ohio. USDA Natl Wildl Res Cent Symp Hum conflicts with Wildl Econ Considerations 10:14Google Scholar
  46. Sielecki LE (2010) Wildlife accident monitoring and mitigation in British Columbia: WARS 1998-2007: special annual report. Environmental Management Section, Engineering Branch, B.C. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, Victoria, B.C., CanadaGoogle Scholar
  47. Sivic A, Sielecki LE (2001) Wildlife warning reflectors speciometric evaluation. Environmental Management Section, Engineering Branch, Ministry of Transportation and Highways, Victoria, p 56Google Scholar
  48. Steiner W, Leisch F, Hackländer K (2014) A review on the temporal pattern of deer-vehicle accidents: impact of seasonal, diurnal and lunar effects in cervids. Accid Anal Prev 66:168–181. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.01.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Trampert K (unpublished) Lichttechnische Untersuchung von Wildwarnreflektoren. Karlsruher Institut für TechnologieGoogle Scholar
  50. Ujvári M, Baagøe HJ, Madsen AB (1998) Effectiveness of wildlife warning reflectors in reducing deer-vehicle collisions: a behavioral study. J Wildl Manag 62:1094–1099. doi:10.2307/3802562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van der Ree R, Jaeger JAG, van der Grift EA, Clevenger AP (2011) Effects of roads and traffic on wildlife populations and landscape function: road ecology is moving toward larger scales. Ecol Soc 16:9Google Scholar
  52. Waring GH, Griffis JL, Vaughn ME (1991) White-tailed deer roadside behavior, wildlife warning reflectors, and highway mortality. Appl Anim Behav Sci 29:215–223. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(91)90249-W CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zacks JL (1986) Do white-tailed deer avoid red? An evaluation of the premise underlying the design of Swareflex wildlife reflectors. Washington D. C. Transportation Research Record 1075, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Falko Brieger
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert Hagen
    • 1
  • Max Kröschel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Florian Hartig
    • 3
    • 4
  • Imke Petersen
    • 5
  • Sylvia Ortmann
    • 5
  • Rudi Suchant
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Wildlife EcologyForest Research Institute of Baden-WürttembergFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Wildlife Ecology and Wildlife ManagementFreiburg UniversityFreiburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of Biometry and Environmental System AnalysisFreiburg UniversityFreiburgGermany
  4. 4.Theoretical EcologyUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  5. 5.Department Evolutionary EcologyLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife ResearchBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations