Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the spatiotemporal indicators of the population decline of a threatened large forest grouse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many wildlife populations are declining due to anthropologic and environmental pressures. Indicators can facilitate detection of and reaction to population declines. We tested spatial population pattern variables as indicators for the future fate of capercaillie populations in Slovenia. This population was surveyed from 1979 to 1983, 1998 to 2000, and 2008 to 2011. We tested the following indicators of spatial population patterns: the proportion of occupied leks in the neighbourhood of each lek, the distance to the nth nearest occupied lek, the distance to the centre of the cluster and the distance to the closest neighbouring cluster. The AUC and conditional and marginal R2 were used to evaluate the strength of the indicators. There was a steep decline in the number of leks in the Dinaric Mountains during the period 1980–2010, while the number of leks in the Eastern Slovenian Alps and Julian Alps decreased until 2000 and then stabilized. There was an increase in the distance to the nearest occupied leks over the years, but there were differences in this indicator between the clusters. A combination of the distance to the fourth nearest occupied lek and the occupancy of the first nine leks best predicted the future of a lek, showing that the indicators used in the study can be used to predict the future fate of a lek. Our results can help guide future conservation and management decisions to conserve capercaille populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Adamič M (1987) Ekologija divjega petelina (Tetrao urogallus L.) v Sloveniji. Biotehniška fakulteta, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajc M, Čas M, Ballian D, Kunovac S, Zubić G, Grubešić M, Zhelev P, Paule L, Grebenc T, Kraigher H (2011) Genetic differentiation of the western capercaillie highlights the importance of South-Eastern Europe for understanding the species Phylogeography. PLoS One 6:e23602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Brang P, Spathelf P, Larsen JB, Bauhus J, Bonc̆ìna A, Chauvin C, Drössler L, García-Güemes C, Heiri C, Kerr G, Lexer MJ, Mason B, Mohren F, Mühlethaler U, Nocentini S and Svoboda M (2014) Suitability of close-to-nature silviculture for adapting temperate European forests to climate change. Forestry 87:492–503

  • Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313:58–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque J-F, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Morcillo MH, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié J-C, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon RW, Knopf FL (1981) Lek numbers as a trend index to prairie grouse populations. The J Wildlife Manage 45(3):776–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čas M (2006) Fluktuacije populacij divjega petelina (Tetrao urogallus L.) v odvisnosti of pretekle rabe tal in strukture gozdov v jugovzhodnih alpah. Department of forestry. University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciglič R, Perko D (2012) Slovenia in geographical typifications and regionalizations of Europe. Geografski vestnik 84(1):23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi F, Dupre E, Boitani L (1999) A large-scale model of wolf distribution in Italy for conservation planning. Conserv Biol 13:150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Heer M, Kapos V, ten Brink BJE (2005) Biodiversity trends in Europe: development and testing of a species trend indicator for evaluating progress towards the 2010 target. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 360:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin J (2003) Rapid assessment of protected area management effectiveness in four countries. Bioscience 53:833–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman EA, Moisen G (2008) PresenceAbsence: an R package for presence absence analysis. J Stat Softw 23:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde I (1991) Cues in winter habitat selection by Capercaillie .2. Experimental-evidence. Ornis Scand 22:205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde I, Wegge P, Rolstad J (2000) Lost hotspots and passive female preference: the dynamic process of lek formation in capercaillie Tetrao urogallus. Wildlife Biol 6(4):291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutz von Blotzheim UN (ed) (1973) Handbuch der Vogel Mitteleuropas, 5. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Frankfurtam Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory RD, van Strien A, Vorisek P, Gmelig Meyling AW, Noble DG, Foppen RPB, Gibbons DW (2005) Developing indicators for European birds. Philos T R Soc B 360:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2002) Extinction debt at extinction threshold. Conserv Biol 16:666–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2014) The IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/22679487/0. Accessed 15 October 2015

  • Jacob G, Debrunner R, Gugerli F, Schmid B, Bollmann K (2010) Field surveys of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in the Swiss alps underestimated local abundance of the species as revealed by genetic analyses of non-invasive samples. Conserv Genet 11:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kervinen M, Lebigre C, Soulsbury CD (2016) Simultaneous age-dependent and age-independent sexual selection in the lekking black grouse (Lyrurus tetrix). J Animal Ecol 85(3):715–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez M, Voegeli M, Tella JL, Godoy JA (2014) Joint effects of population size and isolation on genetic erosion in fragmented populations: finding fragmentation thresholds for management. Evol Appl 7:506–518

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mortelliti A, Sozio G, Driscoll DA, Bani L, Boitani L, Lindenmayer DB (2014) Population and individual-scale responses to patch size, isolation and quality in the hazel dormouse. Ecosphere 5:art107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss R, Leckie F, Biggins A, Poole T, Baines D, Kortland K (2014) Impacts of human disturbance on capercaillie Tetrao urogallus distribution and demography in Scottish woodland. Wildlife Biol 20:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss R, Oswald J, Baines D (2001) Climate change and breeding success: decline of the capercaillie in Scotland. J Anim Ecol 70:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munguía-Rosas MA, Montiel S (2014) Patch size and isolation predict plant species density in a naturally fragmented forest. PLoS One 9:e111742

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1999) Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: a suggested framework and indicators. For Ecol Manag 115:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2015) Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3:1–122 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollo CJ, Robles L, Seijas JM, Garcia-Miranda A, Otero R (2005) Trends in the abundance of Cantabrian capercaillie Tetrao urogallus cantabricus at leks on the southern slope of the Cantabrian Mountains, north-west Spain. Bird Conserv Internat 15:397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Development Core Team R (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles H, Ciudad C (2012) Influence of habitat quality, population size, patch size, and connectivity on patch-occupancy dynamics of the middle spotted woodpecker. Conserv Biol 26:284–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinini C, Boitani L (2007) Systematic conservation planning and the cost of tackling conservation conflicts with large carnivores in Italy. Conserv Biol 21:1455–1462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda M, Hawkins BA, Morales-Castilla I, Vidanes RM, Ferrero M, Rodriguez MA (2013) Does fragmentation increase extinction thresholds? A European-wide test with seven forest birds. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22(12):1282–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachot S, Perrin N, Neet C (2006) Viability and management of an endangered Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) metapopulation in the Jura Mountains, western Switzerland. Biodivers Conserv 15:2017–2032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segelbacher G, Storch I (2002) Capercaillie in the alps: genetic evidence of metapopulation structure and population decline. Mol Ecol 11:1669–1677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sirkia S, Helle P, Linden H, Nikula A, Norrdahl K, Suorsa P, Valkeajarvi P (2011) Persistence of Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) lekking areas depends on forest cover and fine-grain fragmentation of boreal forest landscapes. Ornis Fennica 88(1):14–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch I (1995) Annual home ranges and spacing patterns of capercaillie in Central Europe. J Wildlife Manage 59:392–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers RW, McFarlane J, Pearce-Higgins JW (2007) Measuring avoidance by capercaillies Tetrao urogallus of woodland close to tracks. Wildl Biol 13(1):19–27

  • Suter W, Graf RF, Hess R (2002) Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and avian biodiversity: testing the umbrella-species concept. Conserv Biol 16:778–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tella JL, Rojas A, Carrete M, Hiraldo F (2013) Simple assessments of age and spatial population structure can aid conservation of poorly known species. Biol Conserv 167:425–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel D, Jenni-Eiermann S, Braunisch V, Palme R, Jenni L (2008) Ski tourism affects habitat use and evokes a physiological stress response in capercaillie Tetrao urogallus: a new methodological approach. J Appl Ecol 45:845–853

  • Uchida K, Ushimaru A (2014) Biodiversity declines due to abandonment and intensification of agricultural lands: patterns and mechanisms. Ecol Monogr 84:637–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrezec A, de Groot M, Kobler A, Mihelič T, Čas M, Tome D (2014) Ecological characteristics of habitats and potential distribution of selected qualification forest bird (aves) species in the scope of Natura 2000 network in Slovenia: the first modelling approach. Gozdarski vestnik 10:472–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson NI, Langston RHW, Gregory RD, Gibbons DW, Marquiss M (2002) Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus abundance and habitat use in Scotland, in winter 1998-99. Bird Study 49:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DR, Martinez TR (2000) Reduction techniques for instance-based learning algorithms. Mach Learn 38(3):257–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZGS (2015) Zavod za gozdove Slovenije o gozdovih za leto 2014. Zavod za Gozdove, Ljubljana, p 138

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

From 1979 and 1985, research on capercaillie lek distribution and activity in Slovenia was organized and financed by projects of the Slovenian Forestry Institute (SFI) and the Slovenian Hunting association (SHA). Between 1998 and 2000, it was supported by projects V4-0175-98, V4-0435 and V4-0492 at the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food of the Republic of Slovenia (RS); the Ministry for Science and Technology of the RS and the Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning of the RS. Between 2009 and 2011, it was supported by the voluntary work of foresters and hunters. Specialists from the SFI, Slovenian Forestry Service (SFS) and SHA were supported by the Research Programme (P4-0107) Forest Biology, Ecology and Technology, financed by the Slovenian Research Agency. Lek data were collected and analysed during all periods of the survey by Dr. M. Čas at the SFI. The research and paper manuscript preparation were financed by the project “Indicators of conservation status and measures for sustaining favourable conservation statuses of species and habitat types in the Natura 2000 forestlands” (V4-1143) at the Slovenian Research agency and the Ministry of Agriculture and Spatial Planning. We are especially grateful to Prof. Dr. M. Adamič for the first organization of the lek monitoring between 1979 and 1985 and support for the subsequent surveys. The authors thank all participants for their support and dedicated conservation fieldwork. We are indebted to Prof. Dr. K. Jerina for suggestions which greatly improved the manuscript. The manuscript is dedicated to the first author Dr. M. Čas, who passed away during its preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarten de Groot.

Electronic supplementary material

Table 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Čas, M., Kobler, A. & de Groot, M. Evaluating the spatiotemporal indicators of the population decline of a threatened large forest grouse. Eur J Wildl Res 63, 45 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-017-1099-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-017-1099-0

Keywords