European badgers (Meles meles) in Ireland and the UK are a reservoir for Mycobacterium bovis, the causative agent of bovine tuberculosis (TB). A number of interventions have been evaluated in attempts to control bovine TB within badger populations, and many of which rely on the capture of badgers. One strategy being implemented within Ireland is intramuscular vaccination using Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), as an alternative to badger culling. The success of vaccination as a disease control strategy depends on the ability to capture badgers and administer vaccines; thus, trapping success is crucial to effectively vaccinate the population (maximize vaccine coverage). A field vaccine trial was conducted in County Kilkenny, Ireland, from 2010–2013. We used data from this trial to evaluate the association between weather (precipitation and temperature data), badger sett characteristics, and badger trapping success. Approximately 10% of capture efforts resulted in a badger capture. Our results indicate that badger captures were the highest in drizzle, rain, and heavy rain weather conditions, and when minimum temperatures ranged from 3–8 °C. Badger captures were the highest at main setts (large burrow systems), and when sett activity scores were high (qualitative classes 4 or 5). Using local precipitation and temperature data in conjunction with observed sett characteristics provides wildlife managers with guidelines to optimize trapping success. Implementing capture operations under optimal conditions should increase the trapping success of badgers and allow for increased delivery of vaccines to manage bovine TB.
Wildlife management Badger capture probability Climate effects Wildlife vaccine
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank the field staff who made this study possible and John Cummins and Richie Browne in particular. Thanks to Danny Martin for his assistance with map creation. Comments from Tom Hobbs, Beth Ross, Emily Weiser, Drew Ricketts, and Bram Verheijen improved earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
LEM was supported by the Morris Animal Foundation Veterinary Fellowship for Advanced Study (grant ID: D15ZO-906). This manuscript has not been reviewed or endorsed by the Morris Animal Foundation, and the views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation. The fieldwork was funded by the Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All badger captures were conducted under licenses issued by the Irish Department of Health & Children and approved by the University College Dublin animal ethics committee. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Baker PJ, Harris S, Robertson CP et al (2001) Differences in the capture rate of cage-trapped red foxes Vulpes vulpes and an evaluation of rabies control measures in Britain. J Appl Ecol 38:823–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begon M (2009) Ecological epidemiology. The Princeton Guide to Ecology, In, pp 220–226Google Scholar
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Byrne AW, Paddy Sleeman D, O’Keeffe J, Davenport J (2012b) The ecology of the European badger (Meles meles) in Ireland: a review. Biol Environ Proc R Ir Acad 112:105–132. doi:10.3318/BIOE.2012.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne AW, Fogarty U, O’Keeffe J, Newman C (2015a) In situ adaptive response to climate and habitat quality variation: spatial and temporal variation in European badger (Meles meles) body weight. Glob Change Biol n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/gcb.12939Google Scholar
Byrne AW, O’Keeffe J, Fogarty U et al (2015b) Monitoring trap-related injury status during large-scale wildlife management programmes: an adaptive management approach. Eur J Wildl Res. doi:10.1007/s10344-015-0916-6Google Scholar
Chambers MA, Rogers F, Delahay RJ et al (2011) Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination reduces the severity and progression of tuberculosis in badgers. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:1913–1920. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox GW, Hunt J (1992) Relation of seasonal activity patterns of valley pocket gophers to temperature, rainfall, and food availability. J Mammal 73:123–134. doi:10.2307/1381873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler PA, Racey PA (1988) Overwintering strategies of the badger, Meles meles, at 57 °N. J Zool 214:635–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goszczyński J, Jedrzejewska B, Jedrzejewski W (2000) Diet composition of badgers (Meles meles) in a pristine forest and rural habitats of Poland compared to other European populations. J Zool 250:495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan MJ, Rahman MA, Newman C et al (2015) Avoiding verisimilitude when modelling ecological responses to climate change: the influence of weather conditions on trapping efficiency in European badgers (Meles meles). Glob Change Biol n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/gcb.12942Google Scholar
O’Keeffe JJ (2006) Description of a medium term national strategy toward eradication of tuberculosis in cattle in Ireland. In: Proceeding of the 11th Symposium of the International Society of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Cairns, p 502Google Scholar
Pawlina IM, Proulx G (1999) Factors affecting trap efficiency: a review. In: Mammal trapping. Alpha Wildlife Research & Management, Sherwood Park, pp 95–115Google Scholar
Smal C (1995) The badger and habitat survey of Ireland. Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry, DublinGoogle Scholar
StataCorp (2013) Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. StataCorp LP, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
Tuyttens FAM, Macdonald DW, Delahay R et al (1999) Differences in trappability of European badgers Meles meles in three populations in England. J Appl Ecol 36:1051–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson D, Smith GC, Delahay RJ, Cheeseman CL (2004) A model of bovine tuberculosis in the badger Meles meles: an evaluation of different vaccination strategies. J Appl Ecol 41:492–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar