Skip to main content
Log in

Dietary partitioning between European roe deer and European brown hare

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European roe deer Capreolus capreolus and the European brown hare Lepus europaeus are two important and widespread herbivores in Europe. In recent decades, roe deer have generally increased throughout Europe, while brown hares have decreased, because of habitat changes caused by agricultural intensification. It is unclear whether resource exploitation by roe deer may favour this decline. The analysis of interspecific dietary patterns could help to assess whether a potential for competition occurs between these herbivores. Through micro-histological analyses of feces, we have assessed food habits, diet selection, and dietary overlap between roe deer and brown hares in a Mediterranean mixed wood-agricultural area, in 2007–2008. We detected significant differences between the composition of diets of these two herbivores. Deciduous and evergreen wood plants were the staple of roe deer (each of them built up >30 % of total diet), while cereals, spontaneous herbs, and graminoids were the staple of hares (each of them built up 23–33 % of diet). These items were selected by roe deer and hares, with seasonal differences in selection indices, likely depending on variation of availability of different food categories. The dietary breadth of roe deer was ca. 2.5 times greater than that of hares; the interspecific dietary overlap was low but increased in winter, and the dietary niche of hares was included in that of roe deer. Our results suggest that dietary and habitat partitioning occurred between roe deer and hares, with wood and open field being their main foraging habitat, respectively. Ecological overlap occurred in winter, when roe deer aggregate in open fields and increase their use of wheat, the main food item of hares. Most likely, abundance of cultivated cereals and spontaneous herbs for hares and presence of wood, providing roe deer with high-quality browse, reduce the potential for interspecific competition and are the key for the coexistence between these herbivores, in Mediterranean agricultural areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (1998) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen R, Gaillard JM, Linnell JDC, Duncan P (2000) Factors affecting maternal care in an income breeder, the European roe deer. J Anim Ecol 69:672–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsenault R, Owen-Smith N (2002) Facilitation versus competition in grazing herbivore assemblages. Oikos 97:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky GE (1984) Moose and snowshoe hare competition and a mechanistic explanation from foraging theory. Oecologia 61:150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brillouin L (1956) Science and information theory. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis JL (1990) Comparison of the diets of two sympatric lagomorphs, Lepus europaeus (Pallas) and Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.) in an agroecosystem of the Ile-de-France. Z Saügertierkd 55:176–185

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer WF, Prins HHT (1990) Large herbivores that strive mightily but eat and drink as friends. Oecologia 82:264–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P, Tixier H, Hoffman RR, Lechner-Doll M (1998) Feeding strategies and the physiology of digestion in roe deer. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University, Oslo, pp 91–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga CL, Salzer DW, Willoughby JW (1998) Measuring and monitoring plant populations. Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1730-1, BLM/RS/ST 98/005 + 1730. National Business Center, Denver, CO

  • Frylestam B (1986) Agricultural land use effects on the winter diet of brown hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas) in southern Sweden. Mammal Rev 16:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith P (1983) Quantitative plant ecology, 3rd edn. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell J, Wauters LA, Lurz PWW, Tosi G (2004) Alien species and interspecific competition: effects of introduced eastern grey squirrels on red squirrel population dynamics. J Anim Ecol 73:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hass CC (2009) Competition and coexistence in sympatric bobcats and pumas. J Zool 278:174–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebblewhite M, White CA, Nietvelt CG, McKenzie JA, Hurd TE, Fryxell JM, Bayley SE, Paquet PC (2005) Human activity mediates a trophic cascade caused by wolves. Ecology 86:2135–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM, Vincent JP, Reby D (1998) Social organisation of European roe deer. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 189–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR (1989) Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78:443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homolka M (1983) The diet of Lepus europaeus in the agrocenoses. Acta Sci Nat Acad Sci Bohemoslov (Brno) 17:1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulbert IAR, Andersen R (2001) Food competition between a large ruminant and a small hindgut: the case of the roe deer and mountain hare. Oecologia 128:499–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illius AW, Gordon IJ (1992) Modelling the nutritional ecology of ungulate herbivores: evolution of body size and competitive interactions. Oecologia 89:428–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins KJ, Wright RG (1988) Resource partitioning and competition among cervids in northern Rocky Mountains. J Appl Ecol 25:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MK, Wofford H, Pearson HA (1983) Microhistological techniques for food habits analyses. Res. Pap. SO-199. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans

  • Katona K, Biró ZS, Hahn I, Kertész M, Altbäcker V (2004) Competition between European hare and European rabbit in a lowland area, Hungary: a long-term ecological study in the period of rabbit extinction. Folia Zool 53:255–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona K, Biró ZS, Szemethy L, Demes T, Nyeste M (2010) Spatial, temporal and individual variability in the autumn diet of European hare (Lepus europaeus) in Hungary. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 56:89–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw KA (1973) Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology, 2nd edn. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology. Addison Wesley Longman, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovari S, Herrero J, Conroy J, Maran T, Giannatos G, Stübbe M, Aulagnier S, Jdeidi T, Masseti M, Nader I, de Smet K, Cuzin F (2008a) Capreolus capreolus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2008: e.T42395A10692673. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T42395A10692673.en. Downloaded on 17 December 2015

  • Lovari S, Bartolommei P, Meschi F, Pezzo F (2008a) Going out to mate: excursion behaviour of female roe deer. Ethology 114:886–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovari S, Minder I, Ferretti F, Mucci N, Randi E, Pellizzi B (2013) Common and snow leopards share prey, but not habitats: competition avoidance by large predators? J Zool 291:127–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovari S, Ferretti F, Corazza M, Minder I, Troiani N, Ferrari C, Saddi S (2014) Unexpected consequences of reintroductions: competition between increasing red deer and threatened Apennine chamois. Anim Conserv 17:359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovari S, Pokheral CP, Jnawali SR, Fusani L, Ferretti F (2015) Coexistence of the tiger and the common leopard in a prey-rich area: the role of prey partitioning. J Zool 295:122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, Mc Donald LL, Thomas DL, Mc Donald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A, Verri A (1990) Population dynamics and habitat selection of the European hare (Lepus europaeus P.) on an area of monocultures of northern Italy. Acta Theriol 35:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meserve PL (1976) Habitat and resource utilization by rodents of a California coastal sage scrub community. J Anim Ecol 45:647–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minder I (2012) Local and seasonal variations of roe deer diet in relation to food resource availability in a Mediterranean environment. Eur J Wildl Res 58:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu CW, Byers CR, Peek JM (1974) A technique for analysis of utilisation-availability data. J Wildl Manag 38:541–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putman RJ (1996) Competition and resource partitioning in temperate ungulate assemblies. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reichlin T, Klansek E, Hacklander K (2006) Diet selection by hares (Lepus europaeus) in arable land and its implications for habitat management. Eur J Wildl Res 52:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson OJ, McAlpine C, House A, Maron M (2013) Influence of interspecific competition and landscape structure on spatial homogenization of avian assemblages. PLoS One 8:e65299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sangiuliano A (2010) Capriolo e lepre europea: competizione o neutralismo? PhD Thesis, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

  • San José C, Lovari S, Ferrari N (1997) Grouping in roe deer: an effect of habitat openness or cover distribution? Acta Theriol 42:235–239

  • Schoener TW (1970) Nonsynchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology 51:408–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 4145:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Mduma S, Brashares JS (2003) Patterns of predation in a diverse predator-prey system. Nature 425:288–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RK, Jennings NV, Harris S (2005) A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. Mammal Rev 35:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen EM, Gauthier G, Bilodeau F, Berteaux D, Gielly L, Taberlet P, Gussarova G, Bellemain E, Hassel K, Stenøien HK, Epp L, Schrøder-Nielsen A, Brochmann C, Yoccoz NG (2015) Highly overlapping winter diet in two sympatric lemming species revealed by DNA metabarcoding. PLoS One 10(1):e0115335. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115335

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson PR, Quinones MJ, Ahumada JA (2000) Influence of fruit availability on ecological overlap among four neotropical primates at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. Biotropica 32:533–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart DRM (1967) Analysis of plant epidermis in faeces: a technique for studying the food preferences of grazing herbivores. J Appl Ecol 4:33–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushma HS, Singh M (2006) Resource partitioning and interspecific interactions among sympatric rain forest arboreal mammals of the Western Ghats, India. Behav Ecol 17:479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telfer ES (1972) Forage yield and browse utilisation on logged areas in New Brunswick. Can J For Res 2:346–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tixier H, Duncan P (1996) Are European roe deer browsers? A review of variations in the composition of their diets. Rev Ecol 51:3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanak AT, Fortin D, Thaker M, Ogden M, Owen C, Greatwood S, Slotow R (2013) Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores. Ecology 94:2619–2631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vidus-Rosin A, Montagna A, Meriggi A, Serrano Perez S (2009) Density and habitat requirements of sympatric hares and cottontails in northern Italy. Hystrix It J Mamm 20:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidus-Rosin A, Meriggi A, Cardarelli E, Serrano Perez S, Mariani MC, Corradelli C, Barba A (2011) Habitat overlap between sympatric European hares (Lepus europaeus) and Eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus) in northern Italy. Acta Theriol 56:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach AD, Shanas U, Inbar (2010) Feeding activity and dietary composition of roe deer at the southern edge of their range. Eur J Wildl Res 56:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to L. Ricci for the permission to work in the “Le Malandrine” estate. We are grateful to L. Marruganti, L. Bindi, E. Finucci, and F. Tolu for their backing during our field work and to P. Bartolommei, A. Bocci, I. Minder, B. Pellizzi, F. Pezzo, G. Serrao, and especially L. Burrini for their help and suggestions in various stages of this work. We thank A. Meriggi and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on early drafts of this paper. This work was financially supported by the University of Siena Administration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro Lovari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sangiuliano, A., Lovari, S. & Ferretti, F. Dietary partitioning between European roe deer and European brown hare. Eur J Wildl Res 62, 527–535 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-1023-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-1023-z

Keywords

Navigation