Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of wild boar predation on nests of wading birds in various Swedish habitats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wild boar has, over the past few decades, undergone an expansion in Europe, which may have negatively affected ground-nesting bird populations and particularly those of wading birds. The aim of this study was to evaluate predation on waders’ nests by wild boar in Sweden, where this species has been increasing since its reintroduction. This was done by placing artificial nests in seven different study areas. A comparison was then made of predation rates of the nests placed on control plots (areas in which no wild boar were present but other predators were) and plots containing different abundances of wild boar. Contrary to our expectations, the proportion of nests predated was significantly lower in those areas in which wild boar were present, with a predation rate of 54 %, whereas the predation rate was 87.5 % in the others. The wild boar was identified as the second most important nest predator in the plots in which it was present, accounting for 18 % of the predated nests. The main predator on both types of plots was the red fox, which was responsible for 28 and 38.5 % of the predated nests on plots with/without wild boar, respectively. Interestingly, predation by badgers occurred principally in areas in which the wild boar was absent (34.5 % of the predated nests), whereas only one nest was predated by this predator in areas containing wild boar. It is not, however, possible to state whether predation by badgers was lower because of the presence of wild boar or whether this was owing to the fact that badgers do not select those particular patches because of habitat features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Acevedo P, Vicente J, Hofle U, Cassinello J, Ruiz-Fons F, Gortázar C (2007) Estimation of European wild boar relative abundance and aggregation: a novel method in epidemiological risk assessment. Epidemiol Infect 135:519–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Acevedo P, Quirós-Fernández F, Casal J, Vicente J (2014) Spatial distribution of wild boar population abundance: basic information for spatial epidemiology and wildlife management. Ecol Indic 36:594–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman JT, Blackmer AL, Eadie JM (2004) Is predation on waterfowl nests density dependent?—Tests at three spatial scales. Oikos 107:128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrén H (1992) Corvid density and nest predation in relation to forest fragmentation: a landscape perspective. Ecology 73:794–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1980) Vildsvin i Sverige. Betänkande av Jakt-och viltvårdsberedningen. SOU: 1980: 11. Stockholm: Liberförlag/Allmanna förlag

  • Apollonio M, Anderson R, Putman R (2010) European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballari SA, Barrios-García MN (2013) A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges. Mammal Rev 44:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrios-García M, Ballari S (2012) Impact of wild boar Sus scrofa in its introduced and native range: a review. Biol Invasions 14:2283–2300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batáry P, Fronczek S, Normann C, Scherber C, Tscharntke T (2014) How do edge effect and tree species diversity change bird diversity and avian nest survival in Germany’s largest deciduous forest? For Ecol Manag 319:44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayne EM, Hobson KA (1997) Comparing the effects of landscape fragmentation by forestry and agriculture on predation of artificial nests. Conserv Biol 11:1418–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver DL, Osborn RG, Custer TW (1980) Nest-site and colony characteristics of wading birds in selected Atlantic coast colonies. Wilson J Ornithol 92:200–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg Å (1996) Predation on artificial, solitary and aggregated wader nests of farmland. Oecologia 107:343–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernes C (2011) Biodiversity in Sweden. Naturvardsverket

  • Bolton M, Butcher N, Sharpe F, Stevens D, Fisher G (2007) Remote monitoring of nests using digital camera technology. J Field Ornithol 78:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Hickey C, Harrington B, Gill R (2001) United States shorebird conservation plans, 2nd edn. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Monomet

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunton DH (1997) Impacts of predators: center nests are less successful than edge nests in a large nesting colony of least terns. Condor 99:372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunton DH (1999) “Optimal” colony size for least terns: an inter-colony study of opposing selective pressures by predators. Condor 101:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno CG, Alados CL, Gómez-García D, Barrio IC, García-González R (2009) Understanding the main factors in the extent and distribution of wild boar rooting on alpine grasslands. J Zool 279:195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno CG, Barrio IC, García-González R, Alados CL, Gómez-García D (2010) Does wild boar rooting affect livestock grazing areas in alpine grasslands? Eur J Wildl Res 56:765–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpio AJ, Guerrero–Casado J, Ruiz–Aizpurua L, Vicente J, Tortosa FS (2014a) The high abundance of wild ungulates in a Mediterranean region: is this compatible with the European rabbit? Wildl Biol 20:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpio AJ, Guerrero–Casado J, Tortosa FS, Vicente J (2014b) Predation of simulated red-legged partridge nests in big game estates from South Central Spain. Eur J Wildl Res 60:391–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro-Caro JC, Carpio AJ, Tortosa FS (2014) Herbaceous ground cover reduces nest predation in olive groves. Bird Study 61:537–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens RS, Herrod A, Weston MA (2014) Lines in the mud; revisiting the boundaries of important shorebird areas. J Nat Conserv 22:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J (1996) Handbook of the birds of the world. Hoatzin to Auks. Vol. 3. Ediciones Lynx, Barcelona

  • Evans JC, Votier SC, Dall SRX (2015) Information use in colonial living. Biol Rev. doi:10.1111/brv.12188

    Google Scholar 

  • Göransson G, Karlsson J, Nilsson SG, Ulfstrand S (1975) Predation on birds’ nests in relation to antipredator aggression and nest density: an experimental study. Oikos 26:117–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gortázar C, Ferroglio E, Hofle U, Frolich K, Vicente J (2007) Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock: a European perspective. Eur J Wildl Res 53:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gortázar C, Ferroglio E, Lutton CE, Acevedo P (2010) Disease-related conflicts in mammal conservation. Wild Res 37:668–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner H (1997) Ecology of wading birds. Waterbirds 20:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath MF, Borggreve C, Peet N (2000) European bird populations: estimates and trends. BirdLife International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero J, Garcia-Serrano A, Couto S, Ortuno VM, Garcia-Gonzalez R (2006) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. Eur J Wildl Res 52:245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1995) Do avian and mammalian nest predators select for different nest dispersion patterns of fieldfares Turdus pilaris? A 15-year study. Ibis 137:484–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover JP (2006) Water depth influences nest predation for a wetland-dependent bird in fragmented bottomland forests. Biol Conserv 127:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhta E, Mappes T, Jokimäki J (1996) Predation on artificial ground nests in relation to forest fragmentation, agricultural land and habitat structure. Ecography 19:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Wader Study Group (2003) Are waders world-wide in decline? Reviewing the evidence. Conclusions from the 2003 International Wader Study Group conference in Cádiz, Spain

  • Krakauer DC (1995) Groups confuse predators by exploiting perceptual bottlenecks: a connectionist model of the confusion effect. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagos L, Picos J, Valero E (2012) Temporal pattern of wild ungulate-related traffic accidents in northwest Spain. Eur J Wildl Res 58:661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw RA, Smart J, Smart MA, Gill JA (2015) The influence of landscape features on nest predation rates of grassland-breeding waders. Ibis 157:700–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström Å, Green M, Husby M, Kålås JA, Lehikoinen A (2015) Large-scale monitoring of waders on their boreal and arctic breeding grounds in northern Europe. Ardea 103:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonal MA, Bolton M (2008) Predation on wader nests in Europe. Ibis 140:54–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpas LR, Kennerley RJ, Hirons GJM, Sheldon RD, Ausden M, Gilbert JC, Smart J (2013) The use of predator-exclusion fencing as a management tool improves the breeding success of waders on lowland wet grassland. J Nat Conserv 21:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massei G, Genov PV, Staines BW (1996) Diet, food availability and reproduction of wild boar in a Mediterranean coastal area. Acta Theriol 41:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massei G, Kindberg J, Licoppe A, Gacic D, Šprem N, Kamler J, Baubet E, Hohman H, Monaco A, Ozolins J, Cellina S, Podgorski T, Fonseca C, Markov N, Pokorny B, Rosell C, Nahlik A (2015) Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Manag Sci 71:492–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff B, Cargnelli L, Côté I (2004) Solitary nesting as an alternative breeding tactic in colonial nesting bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neinavaz E, Barati A, Brown JL, Etezadifar F, Emami B (2013) Effects of nest characteristics and black rat Rattus rattus predation on daily survival rates of great egret Ardea alba nests in mangrove forest in the Hara Biosphere Reserve, the Persian Gulf. Wildl Biol 19:240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nethersole-Thompson D, Nethersole-Thompson M (1986) Waders: their breeding. Haunts and Watchers, Poyser

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottvall R, Smith HG (2006) Effects of an agri-environment scheme on wader populations of coastal meadows of southern Sweden. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113:264–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picman J, Pribil S, Isabelle A (2002) Antipredation value of colonial nesting in yellow-headed blackbirds. Auk 119:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piersma T (2007) Using the power of comparison to explain habitat use and migration strategies of shorebirds worldwide. J Ornithol 148:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portugal SJ, Maurer G, Thomas GH, Hauber ME, Grim T, Cassey P (2014) Nesting behaviour influences species-specific gas exchange across avian eggshells. J Exp Biol 217:3326–3332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pratte I, Davis SE, Maftei M, Mallory ML (2016) Aggressive neighbours and dense nesting: nest site choice and success in high-Arctic common eiders. Polar Biol 1–8. doi:10.1007/s00300-015-1884–8

  • Praus L, Hegemann A, Tieleman BI, Weidinger K (2014) Predators and predation rates of skylark Alauda arvensis and woodlark Lullula arborea nests in a semi-natural area in the Netherlands. Ardea 102:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rands MRW (1988) Effect of nest site selection on nest predation in grey partridge. Ornis Fenn 19:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross RK, Smith PA, Campbell B, Friis CCA, Morrison RIG (2012) Population trends of shorebirds in Southern Ontario, 1974–2009. Waterbirds 35:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saniga M (2002) Nest loss and chick mortality in capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in West Carpathians. Folia Zool 51:205–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasvári L, Hegyi Z (1994) Colonial and solitary nesting choice as alternative breeding tactics in tree sparrow Passer montanus. J Anim Ecol 63:265–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe FE (2006) Productivity and population trends of northern Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) in Britain. PhD dissertation, University of Bath, Bath, UK

  • Taylor LNH, Ford HA (1998) Predation of artificial nests in fragmented landscape on the New England Tablelands of New South Wales. Wildl Res 25:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throrup O (2006) Breeding waders in Europe 2000. International Wader Studies 14: International Wader Study Group, UK

  • Thurfjell H, Ball JP, Ahlén PA, Kornacher P, Dettki H, Sjoberg K (2009) Habitat use and spatial patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa (L.): agricultural fields and edges. Eur J Wildl Res 55:517–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truvé J, Lemel J (2003) Timing and distance of natal dispersal for wild boar Sus scrofa in Sweden. Wildl Biol 9:51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryjanowski P, Gołdyn B, Surmacki A (2002) Influence of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes, Linnaeus 1758) on the distribution and number of breeding birds in an intensively used farmland. Ecol Res 17:395–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virgós E (2002) Factors affecting wild boar (Sus scrofa) occurrence in highly fragmented Mediterranean landscapes. Can J Zool 80:430–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welander J (2000) Spatial and temporal dynamics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) rooting in a mosaic landscape. J Zool 252:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetlands International (2012) Waterbird population estimates, fifth edition. Summary Report. Wetlands International, Wageningen, Netherlands

  • Wiklund CG, Andersson M (1994) Natural selection of colony size in a passerine bird. J Anim Ecol 63:765–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Will C (1994) Flocking is an effective anti-predation strategy in redshanks, Tringa totanus. Anim Behav 47:433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood GW, Roark DN (1980) Food habits of feral hogs in coastal South Carolina. J Wildl Manag 44:506–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the farmers who gave us permission to work in their fields. We would also like to thank Staffan Ulfstrand for his comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. The authors wish to acknowledge the many collaborators who contributed to the field work during the study period, such as Inga-Britt, Margareta, Inge, and Petter. This work received financial support from the research project AGL2012-40128-C03-01 and EU–FEDER funds. AJC holds a FPI pre-doctoral scholarship.

Author contributions

AJC and FST conceived and designed the experiments. AJC and LH performed the experiments. AJC and LH analyzed the data. AJC, LH, and FST wrote the manuscript; the other authors provided the editorial advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio J. Carpio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carpio, A.J., Hillström, L. & Tortosa, F.S. Effects of wild boar predation on nests of wading birds in various Swedish habitats. Eur J Wildl Res 62, 423–430 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-1016-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-1016-y

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Antonio J. Carpio