Response of the red fox to expansion of human habitation in the Trans-Himalayan mountains
- 322 Downloads
Habitat modification through rural and urban expansions negatively impacts most wildlife species. However, anthropogenic food sources in habitations can benefit certain species. The red fox Vulpes vulpes can exploit anthropogenic food, but human subsidies sometimes also sustain populations of its potential competitor, the free-ranging dog Canis familiaris. As human habitations expand, populations of free-ranging dog are increasing in many areas, with unknown effects on wild commensal species such as the red fox. We examined occurrence and diet of red fox along a gradient of village size in a rural mountainous landscape of the Indian Trans-Himalaya. Diet analyses suggest substantial use of anthropogenic food (livestock and garbage) by red fox. Contribution of livestock and garbage to diet of red fox declined and increased, respectively, with increasing village size. Red fox occurrence did not show a clear relationship with village size. Red fox occurrence showed weak positive relationships with density of free-ranging dog and garbage availability, respectively, while density of free-ranging dog showed strong positive relationships with village size and garbage availability, respectively. We highlight the potential conservation concern arising from the strong positive association between density of free-ranging dog and village size.
KeywordsVulpes vulpes Canis familiaris Carnivore Human subsidies Commensal Diet Dog
We are thankful to the Forest Research Institute University, Dehradun and Himachal Pradesh Forest Department (Wildlife Wing), Shimla, for the permissions and support. The fieldwork was supported by Narendra Babu Ecological Research Initiative Grant. We are also thankful to Fondation Segré–Whitley Fund for Nature for supporting our research and conservation programmes. Chhering Dorje and Takpa provided invaluable help during fieldwork.
- Aryal A, Sathyakumar S, Kreigenhofer B (2010) Opportunistic animal’s diet depend on prey availability: spring dietary composition of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the dhorpatan hunting reserve, Nepal. J Ecol Natl Environ 2(4):59–63Google Scholar
- Bidlack LA, Merenlender A, Getz MW (2006) Distribution of non-native red foxes in East Bay Oak Woodlands. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-217. In: Sixth California Oak Symposium: Today’s challenges, tomorrow’s opportunities, October 9–12, 2006, Rohnert Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Brassine MC, Parker DM (2011) Does the presence of large predators affect the diet of a mesopredator? Afr J Ecol Notes and Records: 1–4Google Scholar
- Champion FW, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of the forest types of India. Government of India, IndiaGoogle Scholar
- Contesse P et al (2004) The diet of urban foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and the availability of anthropogenic food in the city of Zurich, Switzerland. Mamm Biol 69(2):81–95Google Scholar
- Fuhrmann B (2002) Tracking down Yellowstone’s Red Fox: skis, satellites, and historical sightings. Yellowstone Scie 10(1):8–15Google Scholar
- Gloor S et al (2001) The rise of urban fox populations in Switzerland. Mamm Biol 66:155–164Google Scholar
- Macdonald DW, Reynolds JC (2008) Vulpes vulpes. IUCN 2011. IUCN Red list of threatened species. Version 2011.2. HYPERLINK “http://www.iucnredlist.org/”www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 07 May 2012.
- Mishra C (2000) Socio-economic transitions and wildlife conservation in the Indian Trans-Himalaya. J Bom Natl Hist Soc 95:215–220Google Scholar
- Mishra C (2001) High altitude survival: conflicts between pastoralism and wildlife in the Trans-Himalaya. PhD Dissertation, Wageningen University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Stempniewicz L (2006) Polar bear predatory behaviour toward molting barnacle geese and nesting glaucous gulls on Spitsbergen. Arctic 59(3):247–251Google Scholar
- Sutherland WJ (1996) Ecological census techniques: a hand book, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
- USL (2011) Management plan for upper spiti landscape including the kibber wildlife sanctuary. Wildlife wing Himachal Pradesh Forest Department, Shimla and Nature Conservation Foundation, MysoreGoogle Scholar