Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Modeling the distribution of Apennine brown bears during hyperphagia to reduce the impact of wild boar hunting


The Apennine brown bear (Ursus arctos marsicanus) survives today in a relict population of about 50 bears in the central Apennines, even though they have been long protected and habitat suitability at the landscape scale does not appear to be a limiting factor for population recovery. Multiple uses within the bear range may increase disturbance and chances of human-caused mortality, including wild boar hunting drives with dogs conducted in the fall and coinciding with hyperphagia in bears. Although wild boar hunting drives represent a very popular recreational activity throughout the central Apennines, this is a very invasive practice and is thought to exert both direct and indirect detrimental effects on bears. In order to foster the progressive abandonment of wild boar hunting drives in the bear range in favor of less impacting hunting methods, we developed a species distribution model (SDM) to identify areas of likely bear presence during hyperphagia. This SDM could represent the basis to develop a hunting zoning system useful to modulate wild boar hunting regimes according to the bear occurrence. Starting from a large dataset of bear occurrences collected from September to November (2005–2010) within the core distribution range of the bear (n = 5746 GPS- and VHF-telemetry locations on 25 adult and subadult bears, plus other signs of bear presence), we modeled the distribution of bears during hyperphagia and selected candidate models using second order corrected Akaike information criteria (AIC c ). The final model included 16 environmental, topographic, and anthropogenic variables and was evaluated using the continuous Boyce index (0.91). By intersecting the bear occurrence model with a proxy of wild boar hunting intensity, we identified the areas where the banning of wild boar hunting drives represents a priority, and where less impacting hunting regimes are urgently needed. By discussing how such a model can be used to facilitate consensus toward alternative hunting management scenarios, we believe our approach can be extended to other small populations of bears, and of other species as well, that live in multiple-use landscapes and are in need of recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Academiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281

  2. Anonymous (2011) Piano d’azione nazionale per la tutela dell’orso bruno marsicano (PATOM). Quad Cons Nat 37, Ministero dell’Ambiente—ISPRA, Roma, Italy [In Italian]

  3. Apollonio M, Randi E, Toso S (1988) The systematics of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Italy. Boll Zool 55:213–221

  4. Baldwin RA, Bender LC (2008) Den-site characteristics of black bears in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. J Wildl Manag 72:1717–1724

  5. Bateson P, Bradshaw EL (1997) Physiological effects of hunting red deer (Cervus elaphus). Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 264:1707–1714

  6. Boscagli G (1987) Brown bear mortality in Central Italy from 1970 to 1984. Int Conf Bear Res Manag 7:97–98

  7. Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FKA (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Model 157:281–300

  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information theoretic approach. Springer, New York

  9. Carotenuto L, Pizzol I, Di Clemente G, Caporioni M, Davoli F, Donfrancesco S, Guj I, Lecce A, Monaco A, Peria E, Saltari MC, Serafini D, Tarquini L (2014) Long-distance, long-term movements of Apennine brown bears outside the core area. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 25 (Supplement). Proceedings of the IX Italian Congress of Mammalogy, May 7th–10th 2014, Civitella Alfedena (AQ, Italy), p 6

  10. Cianfrani C, Le Lay G, Maiorano L, Satizàbal HF, Loy A, Guisan A (2011) Adapting global conservation strategies to climate change at the European scale: the otter as a flagship species. Biol Conserv 144:2068–2080

  11. Cianfrani C, Maiorano L, Loy A, Kranz A, Lehmann A, Maggini R, Guisan A (2013) There and back again? Combining habitat suitability modeling and connectivity analyses to assess a potential return of the otter to Switzerland. Anim Conserv 16:584–594

  12. Ciarniello LM, Boyce MS, Heard DC, Seip DR (2007a) Components of grizzly bear habitat selection: density, habitats, roads, and mortality risks. J Wildl Manag 71:1446–1457

  13. Ciarniello LM, Boyce MS, Seip DR, Heard DC (2007b) Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent. Ecol Appl 17:1424–1440

  14. Ciucci P, Boitani L (2008) The Apennine brown bear: a critical review of its status and conservation problems. Ursus 19:130–145

  15. Ciucci P, Tosoni E, Di Domenico G, Quattrociocchi F, Boitani L (2014) Seasonal and annual variation in the food habits of the remnant Apennine bear (Ursus arctos marsicanus) population, central Italy. J Mammal 95:572–586

  16. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2012) Protected areas in Europe—an overview. EEA Report 5/2012, Copenaghen

  17. Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudik M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt to ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57

  18. Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Garton EO, Ciucci P, Boitani L (2008) Land-cover change and the future of the Apennine brown bear: a perspective from the past. J Mammal 89:1502–1511

  19. Falcucci A, Ciucci P, Maiorano L, Gentile L, Boitani L (2009) Assessing habitat quality for conservation using an integrated occurrence-mortality model. J Appl Ecol 46:600–609

  20. Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Tempio G, Boitani L, Ciucci P (2013) Modeling the potential distribution for a range-expanding species: wolf recolonization of the Alpine range. Biol Conserv 158:63–72

  21. Farley SD, Robbins CT (1995) Lactation, hibernation, and mass dynamics of American black bears and grizzly bears. Can J Zool 73:2216–2222

  22. FOP (Fundación Oso Pardo) (2005) Los cazadores asturianos y la conservación del oso. Manual para cazar en zonas oseras asturianas. Fundacion Oso Pardo—LIFE00NAT/E/007352 Conservación del oso cantábrico y lucha contra el furtivismo [In Spanish]

  23. Forconi P, Davoli F, Di Clemente G, Dell’Orso M, Pizzol I, Randi E, Ciucci P (2014) Fatal long distance roaming of a male bear highlights survival threats to dispersing bears in the Apennines, central Italy. Hystrix Ital J Mammal 25:56–58

  24. Gervasi V, Ciucci P, Boulanger J, Randi E, Boitani L (2012) A multiple data source approach to improve abundance estimates of small populations: the brown bear in the Apennines, Italy. Biol Conserv 152:10–20

  25. Gillies CS, Hebblewhite M, Nielsen SE, Krawchuk MA, Aldridge CL, Frair JL, Saher DJ, Stevens CE, Jerde CL (2006) Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. J Anim Ecol 75:887–898

  26. Grignolio S, Merli E, Bongi P, Ciuti S, Apollonio M (2011) Effects of hunting with hounds on a non-target species living on the edge of a protected area. Biol Conserv 144:641–649

  27. Hellgren EC (1998) Physiology of hibernation in bears. Ursus 10:467–477

  28. Hellgren EC, Vaughan MR, Kirkpatrick RL (1989) Seasonal patterns in physiology and nutrition of black bears in Great Dismal Swamp, Virginia-North Carolina. Can J Zool 67:1837–1850

  29. Hirzel AH, Le Lay G, Helfer V, Randin C, Guisan A (2006) Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol Model 199:142–152

  30. Jimenez-Valverde A (2012) Insights into the area under the ROC curve (AUC) as a discrimination measure in species distribution modelling. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:498–507

  31. Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Real R (2008) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:145–151

  32. Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Garton EO, Boitani L (2007) Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conserv Biol 21:1433–1444

  33. Martin J, Basille M, Van Moorter B, Kindberg J, Allainé D, Swenson JE (2010) Coping with human disturbance: spatial and temporal tactics of the brown bear (Ursus arctos). Can J Zool 88:875–883

  34. Massei G, Kindberg J, Licoppe A, Gacic D, Šprem N, Kamler J, Baubet E, Hohman H, Monaco A, Ozolins J, Cellina S, Podgorski T, Fonseca C, Markov N, Pokorny B, Rosell C, Nahlik A (2014) Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Manag Sci (in press)

  35. McLellan BN, Servheen C, Huber D, IUCN SSC Bear Specialist Group (2008) Ursus arctos. In: IUCN 2014. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2014.1. Accessed 2 July 2014

  36. Moe TF, Kindberg J, Jansson I, Swenson JE (2007) Importance of diel behaviour when studying habitat selection: examples from female Scandinavian brown bears (Ursus arctos). Can J Zool 85:518–525

  37. Monaco A, Franzetti B, Pedrotti L, Toso S (2003) Linee guida per la gestione del cinghiale. Ministero Politiche Agricole, Alimentari e Forestali—Ist Naz Fauna Selvatica, Documenti Tecnici 24 [In Italian]

  38. Naves J, Wiegand T, Revilla E, Delibes M (2003) Endangered species constrained by natural and human factors: the case of brown bears in Northern Spain. Conserv Biol 17:1276–1289

  39. Nichols JD, Williams BK (2006) Monitoring for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:668–673

  40. Nielsen SE, Boyce MS, Stenhouse GB, Munro RHM (2002) Modeling grizzly bear habitats in the Yellowhead ecosystem of Alberta: taking autocorrelation seriously. Ursus 13:45–56

  41. Nielsen SE, Boyce MS, Stenhouse GB (2004a) Grizzly bears and forestry I. Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in west-central Alberta, Canada. For Ecol Manag 199:51–65

  42. Nielsen SE, Herrero S, Boyce MS, Mace RD, Benn B, Gibeau ML, Jevons S (2004b) Modeling the spatial distribution of human caused grizzly bear mortalities in the Central Rockies ecosystem of Canada. Biol Conserv 120:101–113

  43. Ordiz A, Støen O-G, Delibes M, Swenson JE (2011) Predators or prey? Spatio-temporal discrimination of human-derived risk by brown bears. Oecologia 166:59–67

  44. Phillips SJ, Dudik M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175

  45. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259

  46. Podruzny SR, Cherry S, Schwartz CC, Landenburger LS (2002) Grizzly bear denning and potential conflict areas in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Ursus 13:19–28

  47. Posillico M, Meriggi A, Pagnin E, Lovari S, Russo L (2004) A habitat model for brown bear conservation and land use planning in the central Apennines. Biol Conserv 118:141–150

  48. Puddu G, Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Corsi F, Boitani L (2009) Spatially-explicit assessment of current and future conservation options for the endangered Corsican Red Deer (Cervus elaphus corsicanus) in Sardinia. Biodivers Conserv 18:2001–2016

  49. Pullin AS, Knight TM, Stone DA, Charman K (2004) Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biol Conserv 119:245–252

  50. Sáez-Royuela C, Tellería JL (1986) The increased population of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe. Mammal Rev 16:97–101

  51. Schoener TW (1968) The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704–726

  52. Scillitani L, Monaco A, Toso S (2010) Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behavior in Italy? Some evidences and management implications. Eur J Wildl Res 56:307–318

  53. Smith AB (2013) On evaluating species distribution models with random background sites in place of absences when test presences disproportionately sample suitable habitat. Divers Distrib 19:867–872

  54. Smith RJ, Verìssimo D, Leader-Williams N, Cowling RM, Knight AT (2009) Let the locals lead. Nature 462:280–281

  55. Sunde P, Olesen CR, Madsen TL, Haugaard L (2009) Behavioral responses of GPS-collared female red deer Cervus elaphus to driven hunts. Wildl Biol 15:454–460

  56. Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:305–308

  57. Tosoni E (2010) Indagini Ecologiche Relative alla Popolazione di Orso Bruno Marsicano (Ursus arctos marsicanus) nel Territorio del Parco Nazionale d’Abruzzo, Lazio e Molise. Dissertation, “La Sapienza” University of Rome [In Italian]

  58. Vaughan IP, Ormerod SJ (2005) The continuing challenges of testing species distribution models. J Appl Ecol 42:720–730

  59. Warren DL, Seifert SN (2011) Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol Appl 21:335–342

  60. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2008) Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62:2868–2883

  61. Watts PD, Jonkel C (1988) Energetic cost of winter dormancy in grizzly bear. J Wildl Manag 52:654–656

  62. Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T (2001) Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 16:446–453

  63. Zedrosser A, Dahle B, Swenson JE, Gerstl N (2001) Status and management of the brown bear in Europe. Ursus 12:9–20

Download references


LM was supported by a postdoc fellowship provided by a US donor through the International World Center (Ely, MN, USA). We thank F. Recchia, C. Ciuffetelli, B. Franzetti, V. Mastrangioli, A. Pace, L. Sammarone, and C. Sulli for sharing ideas and comments on wild boar hunting management and brown bear conservation in Abruzzo. We also thank the PNALM wardens and many technicians, students, and volunteers for assistance during fieldwork. L. Gentile (PNALM Veterinary Service) assisted with bear captures, and M. Masi helped with GIS analyses. The PNALM authority provided the data on indirect bear signs, and the Bear Monitoring Network of the Region of Lazio made available bear presence data recently collected in the western peripheral portion of the Apennine bear range. We greatly appreciate the detailed comments and insights of two anonymous referees which allowed us to enhance the content and readability of a previous version of our manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to P. Ciucci.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Acevedo

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resources 1

(DOCX 35 kb)

Online Resources 2

(DOCX 40 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maiorano, L., Boitani, L., Monaco, A. et al. Modeling the distribution of Apennine brown bears during hyperphagia to reduce the impact of wild boar hunting. Eur J Wildl Res 61, 241–253 (2015).

Download citation


  • Apennine brown bear
  • Habitat suitability
  • Multiple land use
  • Species distribution models
  • Ursus arctos marsicanus
  • Wild boar hunting