Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of habitat and game management practices on ring-necked pheasant harvest in the Czech Republic

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus L.) is one of the most popular small game species both numerically and economically. Pheasant populations are commonly managed in the Czech Republic in order to maximize their harvest. Game managers need to be aware of the possible effects of different management tools on wild pheasant populations. We used data from 38 hunting grounds collected over an 8-year period (2004–2011) and generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMMs) to assess whether pheasant harvest was related to the habitat characteristics and game management practices (release of hand-reared individuals and predator control) in the Czech Republic. The proportion of grasslands, idle lands (spontaneously set-aside lands), and organically farmed lands (i.e., with limited use of industrially made fertilizers and pesticides) and the density of watercourses were positively related to the pheasant harvest. The proportion of forests and road density showed a negative relationship with the pheasant harvest. An important effect of year on the pheasant harvest was also found. In terms of game management practices, predator control intensity (i.e., foxes, martens, corvids) was positively related to the pheasant harvest. The release of hand-reared individuals was not included in the final GLMMs. Our study suggests that the best long-term strategy to reinforce the wild population of ring-necked pheasants would be to concentrate on habitat improvement through the implementation of set-aside management, maintaining the right percentage of shrubby and grass vegetation, to continue with targeted predator control, and to reduce the costly practice of releasing of hand-reared individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreska J, Andresková E (1993) Tisíc let české myslivosti. Tina, Vimperk, In Czech

  • Bartoń K (2013) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.9.13. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn. Accessed 23 April 2014

  • Batcheller G, Swift B, Gordon B, Kande M (2010) Management plan for ring-necked pheasants in New York state 2010–2020. Department of Environmental Conservation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke H, Claußen C (2007) Fasan und Rebhuhn. Biologie, Hege, Aufzucht. Franckh-Kosmos, Hamburg

  • Berthelsen PS, Smith LM, Coffman CL (1989) CRP land and game bird production in the Texas High Plains. J Soil Water Conserv 44(5):504–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Best LB, Campa H III, Kemp KE, Robel RJ, Ryan MR, Savidge JA, Weeks HP, Winterstein SR (1997) Bird abundance and nesting in CRP fields and cropland in the Midwest. Wildl Soc Bull 25(4):864–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschutz T, McInroy M, Kruger L (2011) Iowa August roadside survey. Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Des Moines

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittas R, Marcström V, Kenward RE, Karlbom M (1992) Survival and breeding success of reared and wild ring-necked. J Wildl Manag 56(2):368–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalena MJ, Wallingford BD (1996) Experimental pheasant restoration program. Pennsylvania Game Commission, Harrisburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattadori IM, Haydon DT, Thirgood SJ, Hudson PJ (2003) Are indirect measures of abundance a useful index of population density? The case of red grouse harvesting. Oikos 100(3):417–639. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12072.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain DE, Fuller RJ, Bunce RGH, Duckworth JC, Shrubb M (2000) Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. J Appl Ecol 37:771–778. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00548.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WR, Bogenschutz TR (1999) Grassland habitat and reproductive success of ring-necked pheasants in northern Iowa. J Field Ornithol 70(3):380–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark WR, Schmitz RA, Bogenschutz TR (1999) Site selection and nest success of ring-necked pheasants as a function of location in Iowa landscapes. J Wildl Manag 63(3):976–989. doi:10.2307/3802812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML (1985) Habitat selection in birds. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Core Team R (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Csányi S (2000) The effect of hand-reared pheasants on the wild population in Hungary: a modelling approach. Hung Small Game Bull 5:71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Fernández S, Arroyo B, Casas F, Martinez-Haro M, Viñuela J (2013) Effect of game management on wild red-legged partridge abundance. PLoS One 8(6):e66671. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066671

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell SD (1992) Problems and pitfalls of game-bird reintroduction and restocking: an overview. Gibier Faune Sauvag 9:773–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Draycott RAH, Pock K, Carroll JP (2002) Sustainable management of a wild pheasant population in Austria. Z Jagdwiss 48:346–353. doi:10.1007/BF02192427

    Google Scholar 

  • Draycott RAH, Woodburn MIA, Carroll JP, Sage RB (2005) Effects of spring supplementary feeding on population density and breeding success of released pheasants Phasianus colchicus in Britain. Wildl Biol 11(3):177–182. doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2005)11[177:EOSSFO]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draycott RAH, Bliss TH, Carroll JP, Pock K (2009) Provision of brood-rearing cover on agricultural land to increase survival of wild ring-necked pheasant Phasianus colchicus broods at Seefeld Estate, Lower Austria, Austria. Conserv Evid 6:6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggebo SL, Higgins KF, Naugle DE, Quamen FR (2003) Effects of CRP field age and cover type on ring-necked pheasants in eastern South Dakota. Wildl Soc Bull 31(3):779–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris AL, Klonglan ED, Nomsen RC (1977) The ring-necked pheasant in Iowa. Iowa Conversation Commision, Des Moines

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbert AE, Leif AP, Purvis JR, Flake LD (1999) Survival and habitat use by ring-necked pheasants during two disparate winters in South Dakota. J Wildl Manag 63(2):711–722. doi:10.2307/3802661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudioso VR, Sánchez-García C, Prieto R, Bartolomé DJ, Pérez JA, Alonso ME (2010) Small game water troughs in a Spanish agrarian pseudo steppe: visits and water site choice by wild fauna. Eur J Wildl Res 56:591–599. doi:10.1007/s10344-009-0352-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi P, Besa M, Toso S (1999) Habitat selection by breeding pheasants Phasianus colchicus in an agricultural area of northern Italy. Wildl Biol 5(4):193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RE (1984) The feeding ecology and survival of partridge chicks (Alectoris rufa and Perdix perdix) on arable farmland in East Anglia. J Appl Ecol 21(3):817–830. doi:10.2307/2405049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthery FS (2002) The technology of bobwhite management: the theory behind the practice. Iowa State Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart CM, Brueggemann SJ, Fien CA (2009) A new perspective and methods for pheasant management. Calif Fish Game 95:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman FE, Sheffer DE (1971) Population dynamics and hunter harvest of ring-necked pheasant populations in Pennsylvania’s primary range. Proc Northeast Sect Wildl Soc 28:179–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill DA (1985) The feeding ecology and survival of pheasant chicks on arable farmland. J Appl Ecol 22(3):645–654. doi:10.2307/2403218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill DA, Robertson P (1988) The pheasant: ecology, management and conservation. BSP Professional Books, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hladíková B, Zbořil J, Tkadlec E (2008) Population dynamics of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) in central Moravia, Czech Republic (Artiodactyla: Suidae). Lynx 39(1):55–62, In Czech with English summary

    Google Scholar 

  • Homan HJ, Linz GM, Bleier WJ (2000) Winter habitat use and survival of female ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus Colchicus) in southeastern North Dakota. Am Midl Nat J 143:463–480. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2000)143[0463:WHUASO]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ježek M, Štípek K, Kušta K, Červený J, Vícha J (2011) Reproductive and morphometric characteristics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Czech Republic. J For Sci 57(7):285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard PA (1999) The pheasants of the world: biology and natural history, 2nd edn. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • King JW, Savidge JA (1995) Effects of Conservation Reserve Program on wildlife in southeast Nebraska. Wildl Soc Bull 23(3):377–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitson JC (2004) Harvest rate of sooty shearwaters (Puffinus griseus) by Rakiura Maori: a potential tool to monitor population trends? Wildl Res 31:319–325. doi:10.1071/WR02034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger SR (2008) Ring-necked pheasant management plan for Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Game Commission, Harrisburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick JP, Bizeau EG, Benson WW, Mullins WH (1974) Aerial pesticide applications and ring-necked pheasants. J Wildl Manag 38(4):679–685. doi:10.2307/3800035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millán J, Gortazar C, Tizzani P, Buenestado FJ (2002) Do helminths increase vulnerability of released pheasant to fox predation? J Helminthol 76(3):225–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Musil DD, Connelly JW (2009) Survival and reproduction of pen-reared vs translocated wild pheasants Phasianus colchicus. Wildl Biol 15(1):80–88. doi:10.2981/07-049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielson RM, McDonald LL, Sullivan JP, Burgess C, Johnson DS, Johnson DH, Bucholtz S, Hyberg S, Howlin S (2008) Estimating response of ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) to the Conservation Reserve Program. Auk 125(2):434–444. doi:10.1525/auk.2008.07002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins AR, Clark WR, Riley TZ, Vohns PA (1997) Effects of landscape and weather on winter survival ring-necked pheasant hens. J Wildl Manag 61(3):634–664. doi:10.2307/3802171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potts GR (1991) The environmental and ecological importance of cereal fields. In: Fairbank LG, Carter N, Darbyshire JF, Potts GR (eds) The ecology of temperate cereal fields. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley TZ, Clark WR, Ewing DE, Vohs PA (1998) Survival of ring-necked pheasant chicks during brood rearing. J Wildl Manag 62(1):36–44. doi:10.2307/3802262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sage RB, Robertson PA, Wise DR (2001) Survival and breeding success of two ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) strains released into the wild. Game Wildl Sci 18:331–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Santilli F, Bagliacca M (2008) Factors influencing pheasant Phasianus colchicus harvesting in Tuscany, Italy. Wildl Biol 14(3):281–287. doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[281:FIPPCH]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santilli F, Mazzoni Della Stella R, Mani P, Fronte B, Paci G, Bagliacca M (2004) Behavioural differences between pheasants artificially hatched from wild parents or from farm parents. Ann Fac Med Vet 56:344–351, In Italian with English summary

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley KL, Scott DP (2006) Survival and nesting habitat use by Sichuan and ring-necked pheasants released in Ohio. Ohio J Sci 106(3):78–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaug H, Fournier D, Nielsen A, Magnusson A, Bolker B (2013) Generalized linear mixed models using AD Model Builder. R package version 0.7.7. http://glmmadmb.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed 25 May 2014

  • Smith SA, Stewart NJ, Gates JE (1999) Home ranges, habitat selection and mortality of ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) in north-central Maryland. Am Midl Nat 141(1):185–197. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(1999)141[0185:HRHSAM]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šťastný K, Bejček V, Hudec K (2006) Atlas hnízdního rozšíření ptáků v České republice. Aventinum, Praha, In Czech with English summary

    Google Scholar 

  • Switzer CT (2009) Ring-necked pheasant management plan for South Dakota 2009–2014. Department of Game Fish and Parks, Pierre

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapper SC (1999) A question of balance. The Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker GM, Heath MF (1994) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vach M, Bartoš J, Bejček V, Bukovjan K, Hanák J, Janota J, Kůtová J, Pospíšil J, Růžička J, Šťastný K, Zíka T (2010) Vývoj myslivosti a lovectví v českých zemích. Silvestris, Příbram, In Czech

    Google Scholar 

  • Veverka B, Bogenschutz T, Emmerich B, Fandel S, Dahlgren D, Haroldson K, Kohn S, Lusk J, McCanna J, Rodgers R, Runia T, Walter S, Wefer M (2013) National wild pheasant conservation plan. Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner RE (1994) Agricultural land use and grassland habitat in Illinois: future shock for Midwestern birds. Conserv Biol 8(1):147–156. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010147.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner RE, Etter SL (1989) Hay cutting and the survival of pheasants: a long-term perspective. J Wildl Manag 53(2):455–461. doi:10.2307/3801150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner RE, Etter SL, Joselyn BB, Ellis JA (1984) Declining survival of ring-necked pheasant chicks in Illinois agricultural ecosystems. J Wildl Manag 48(1):82–88. doi:10.2307/3808455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler C (1986) The pheasant in Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Zíka T (2014) Age structure, reproduction rate and environmental impacts on population dynamics of ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus Linné, 1758) in current cultural landscape. Dissertation, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic, Grant No. QJ1220314 and by the Grant Agency of the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, CIGA (Project No. 20134314).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic

    Michaela Holá, Tomáš Zíka, Vladimír Hanzal, Tomáš Kušta, Miloš Ježek & Vlastimil Hart

  2. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Department of Ecology, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic

    Miroslav Šálek

Authors
  1. Michaela Holá
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tomáš Zíka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miroslav Šálek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vladimír Hanzal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tomáš Kušta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Miloš Ježek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vlastimil Hart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomáš Zíka.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holá, M., Zíka, T., Šálek, M. et al. Effect of habitat and game management practices on ring-necked pheasant harvest in the Czech Republic. Eur J Wildl Res 61, 73–80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0875-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0875-3

Key words

Search

Navigation