European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 351–357 | Cite as

The tragedy of the commons: unsustainable population structure of Iberian red deer in hunting estates

  • Jerónimo Torres-PorrasEmail author
  • Juan Carranza
  • Javier Pérez-González
  • Concha Mateos
  • Susana Alarcos
Original Paper


Hunting can influence population structure with consequences in ecological and evolutionary processes. Populations of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) in Spain occur under two different management regimes: fenced and unfenced (open) estates. We compared census data, hunting bags and data from hunted individuals between both types of estates. Harvest on stags was moderate in fenced estates but strong in open ones, probably due to the competition between neighbouring landowners over the same deer populations. On the contrary, female culling was low in open estates compared to fenced ones. As a result, populations in open estates have mostly young males and strongly female-biased sex ratios. Female-biased population structure in open estates did not result in higher number of males being harvested per year compared with fenced estates, probably due to negative effects on development, survival and reproduction, and harvested males were younger, and hence, with smaller antlers. There is published evidence for undesirable effects of biased population sex ratio and age structure in these red deer populations. Our results indicate that this type of management may be unsustainable and recommend that harvest on males in open estates should be reduced and that on females increased, in order to maintain a more balanced population structure that may allow sustainable population dynamics and the operation of natural evolutionary processes.


Game management Ungulates Iberian red deer Cervus elaphus hispanicus Fenced estates Open estates 



Our study was initiated under a collaborative agreement between the University of Extremadura and Consejería de Medio Ambiente of Junta de Andalucía. We thank R. Arenas and the staff at Consejería de Medio Ambiente in Córdoba for their support at different stages of our study. We are also grateful to the owners and wardens of the estates studied and to the hunters. C. Sánchez-Prieto, L. Castillo, J.M. Seoane, A. Casado, O. Linares and P. Montero helped in laboratory and fieldwork. This work complies with current Spanish laws. Additional financial support came from Spanish Ministry of Science, project CGL2010-17163.


  1. Allendorf FW, England PR, Luikart G, Ritchie PA, Ryman N (2008) Genetic effects of harvest on wild animal populations. Trends Ecol Evol 23:327–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  3. Beddington JR (1974) Age structure, sex ratio and population density in the harvesting of natural animal populations. J Appl Ecol 11:915–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonenfant C, Gaillard J-M, Klein F, Loison A (2002) Sex- and age dependent effects of population density on life history traits of red deer Cervus elaphus in a temperate forest. Ecography 25:446–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bugalho MN, Milne JA (2003) The composition of the diet of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Mediterranean environment: a case of summer nutritional constraint? For Ecol Manag 181:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunnell FL (1982) The lambing period of mountain sheep: synthesis, hypothesis, and tests. Can J Zool 60:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron TC, Benton TG (2004) Stage-structured harvesting and its effects: an empirical investigation using soil mites. J Anim Ecol 73:996–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carranza J, Alarcos S, Sánchez-Prieto CB, Valencia J, Mateos C (2004) Disposable-soma senescence mediated by sexual selection in an ungulate. Nature 432:215–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caughley G (1966) Mortality patterns in mammals. Ecology 47(6):906–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1989) Red deer in the Highlands. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer. Behaviour and ecology of two sexes. Edinburgh Univ, PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1985a) Parental investment and sex differences in juvenile mortality in birds and mammals. Nature 313:131–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH, Major M, Guinness FE (1985b) Population regulation in male and female red deer. J Anim Ecol 54:831–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clutton-Brock TH, Major M, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1989) Early development and population dynamics in red deer. I. Density-dependent effects on juvenile survival. J Anim Ecol 56:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock TH, Rose KE, Guinness FE (1997) Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1509–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clutton-Brock TH, Coulson TN, Milner-Gulland EJ, Thomson D, Armstrong HM (2002) Sex differences in emigration and mortality affect optimal management of deer populations. Nature 415:633–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coltman DW, O’Donoghue P, Jorgenson JT, Hogg JT, Strobeck C, Festa-Bianchet M (2003) Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426:655–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conradt L, Clutton-Brock TH, Thomson D (1999) Habitat segregation in ungulates: are males forced into suboptimal foraging habitats through indirect competition by females? Oecologia 119:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coulson T, Albon SD, Guinness FE, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (1997) Population substructure, local density, and calf winter survival in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Ecology 78:852–863Google Scholar
  20. Coulson T, Catchpole EA, Albon SD, Morgan BJT, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Crawley MJ, Grenfell BT (2001) Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. Science 292:1528–1531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crawford VP (1990) On the Definition of an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy in the “Playing the Field” Model. J Theor Biol 143:269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crawford VP (1991) An “Evolutionary” Interpretation of Van Huyck, Battalio, and Beil’s Experimental Results on Coordination. Game Econ Behav 3:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Festa-Bianchet M (1988) Birthdate and lamb survival in bighorn lambs (Ovis canadensis). J Zool 214:653–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foley AM, DeYoung RW, Lukefahr SD, Hewitt DG, Lewis JS, Hellickson MW (2012) Repeatability of antler characteristics in mature male white-tailed deer in south Texas: Consequences of environmental effects. J Mamm 93:1149–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fryxell JM, Hussell DJT, Lambert AB, Smith PC (1991) Time lags and population fluctuations in white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag 55:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaillard J-M, Sempere AJ, Boutin J-M, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B (1992) Effects of age and body weight on the proportion of females breeding in a population of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Can J Zool 70:1541–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG (1998) Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol Evol 13:58–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toigo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG (2001) Not all sheep are equal. Science 292:1499–1500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ginsberg JR, Milner-Gulland EJ (1994) Sex biased harvesting and population dynamics in ungulates: implications for conservation and sustainable use. Conserv Biol 8:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glucksman A (1974) Sexual dimorphism in mammals. Biol Rev 49:423–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hardin G (1968) The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162:1243–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holand Ø, Røed KH, Mysterud A, Kumpula JM, Nieminen M, Smith ME (2002) The effect of sex ratio and male age structure on reindeer calving. J Wildl Manag 67:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holand Ø, Mysterud A, Røed KH, Coulson T, Gjøstein H, Weladji RB, Nieminen M (2006) Adaptive adjustment of offspring sex ratio and maternal reproductive effort in an iteroparous mammal. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jorgenson JT, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard J-M, Wishart WD (1997) Effects of age, sex, disease and density on survival of bighorn sheep. Ecology 78:1019–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lahti DC, Johnson NA, Ajie BC, Otto SP, Hendry AP, Blumstein DT, Cos RG, Donohue K, Foster SA (2009) Relaxed selection in the wild. Trends Ecol Evol 24(9):487–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Langvatn R, Loison A (1999) Consequences of harvesting on age structure, sex ratio and population dynamics of red deer Cervus elaphus in central Norway. Wildl Biol 5:213–223Google Scholar
  38. Leberg PL, Smith MH (1993) Influence of density on growth of white-tailed deer. J Mammal 74:723–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Loison A, Gaillard J-M, Pélabon C, Yoccoz NG (1999) What factors shape sexual dimorphism in ungulates? Evol Ecol Res 1:611–633Google Scholar
  40. Martínez M, Rodriguez-Vigal C, Jones OR, Coulson T, San Miguel A (2005) Different hunting strategies select for different weights in red deer. Biol Lett 1:353–356PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller KV, Marchinton RL (1995) Quality Whitetails: The why and how of Quality Deer Management. Stackpole BooksGoogle Scholar
  43. Milner JM, Nilsen EB, Andreassen HP (2007) Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores. Conserv Biol 21:36–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitchell B (1967) Growth layers in dental cement food for determining the age of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). J Anim Ecol 36:279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Monteith KL, Long RA, Bleich VC, Heffelfinger JR, Krausman PR, Bowyer RT (2013) Effects of harvest, culture, and climate on trends in size of horn-like structures in trophy ungulates. Wildl Monogr 183:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mysterud A (2011) Selective harvesting of large mammals: How often does it result in directional selection? J Appl Ecol 48:827–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mysterud A, Holand Ø, Røed KH, Gjøstein H, Kumpula J, Nieminen M (2003) Effects of age, density and sex ratio on reproductive effort in male reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). J Zool (Lond) 261:341–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ostrom E (1990) “Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action”. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  49. Owen-Smith N (1993) Comparative mortality rates of male and female kudus: the costs of sexual dimorphism. J Anim Ecol 62:428–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pérez-González J, Carranza J (2009) Female-biased dispersal under conditions of low male mating competition in a polygynous mammal. Mol Ecol 18:4617–4630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pérez-González J, Mateos C, Carranza J (2009) Polygyny can increase rather than decrease genetic diversity contributed by males relative to females: evidence from red deer. Mol Ecol 18:1591–1600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pérez-González J, Barbosa AM, Carranza J, Torres-Porras J (2010) Relative effect of food supplementation and natural resources on female red deer distribution in a Mediterranean ecosystem. J Wildl Manag 74(8):1701–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reimers E (1983) Reproduction in wild reindeer in Norway. Can J Zool 61:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sæther B-E, Solberg EJ, Heim M (2003) Effects of altering sex ratio structure on the demography of an isolated moose population. J Wildl Manag 67:455–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sæther B-E, Solberg EJ, Heim M, Stacy JE, Jakobsen KS, Olstad R (2004) Offspring sex ratio in moose Alces alces in relation to paternal age: an experiment. Wildl Biol 10:51–57Google Scholar
  56. Singer FJ, Zeingenfuss LC (2002) Influence of trophy hunting and horn size on mating behavior and survivorship of mountain sheep. J Mammal 83:682–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Skogland T (1985) The effects of density-dependent resource limitations on the demography of wild reindeer. J Anim Ecol 54:359–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Solberg EJ, Sæther B-E, Strand O, Loison A (1999) Dynamics of a harvested moose population in a variable environment. J Anim Ecol 68:186–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tuljapurkar S, Caswell H (1997) Structured-population models in marine, terrestrial, and freshwater systems. Chapman & Hall, New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yoccoz NG, Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Stenseth NC (2002) Age and density-dependent reproductive effort in male red deer. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:1523–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerónimo Torres-Porras
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juan Carranza
    • 1
  • Javier Pérez-González
    • 1
  • Concha Mateos
    • 2
  • Susana Alarcos
    • 2
  1. 1.Game and Fish Research CenterUniversity of CórdobaCórdobaSpain
  2. 2.Biology and EthologyUniversity of ExtremaduraCáceresSpain

Personalised recommendations