Advertisement

European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 193–200 | Cite as

Population densities and habitat use of the golden jackal (Canis aureus) in farmlands across the Balkan Peninsula

  • Martin Šálek
  • Jaroslav Červinka
  • Ovidiu C. Banea
  • Miha Krofel
  • Duško Ćirović
  • Ivana Selanec
  • Aleksandra Penezić
  • Stanislav Grill
  • Jan Riegert
Original Paper

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to analyze the habitat use and population densities of the golden jackal in four countries across lowland regions of the Balkan Peninsula, known as the core area of the species' distribution in Europe. Using indirect (acoustic) method for detecting territorial golden jackals, we surveyed jackal presence and densities on 331 monitoring sites in four countries, covering area an of 4,296 km2 in total during April and May 2007–2012. We used GIS to assess landscape and environmental characteristics in a 2-km circular buffer (12.6 km2) around calling stations. Average population density of golden jackals in the study areas ranged between 0.6 and 1.1 territorial groups/10 km2 (mean ± SE, 0.6 ± 0.06 groups/10 km2), with several high-density areas with up to 4.8 territorial groups/10 km2. Analysis of habitat use showed that for both jackal occurrence and number of jackal groups, the only significant parameter was the interaction between country and intensity of agriculture, indicating that jackals adapt their habitat selection patterns in relation to the habitat availability. We observed that selection of the more suitable habitats (shrub–herbaceous vegetation/heterogeneous agricultural vegetation) increased with lower proportion of these habitat types in the study area. Our study confirms high habitat plasticity of the golden jackal and offers explanation for its recent range expansion, which might be connected with the land use changes during the last decades in the Balkan Peninsula.

Keywords

Golden jackal Acoustic monitoring Population density Habitat use GIS Farmland Balkan Peninsula 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Aleš Lipičnik, Nadja Osojnik, and Aleš Sedlar for their help in the field. We thank Giorgos Giannatos, Nikolai Spassov, Luca Lapini, Stoyan Stoyanov, and Dumitru Murariu for their scientific and technical advice. We would also like to thank Marina Kipson for editing the English manuscript. This work was supported by the research aim of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (RVO 68081766), by the grant of Grant Agency of University of South Bohemia 168/2013/P and Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia (Contract TR 31009).

References

  1. Alain B, Gilles P, Yannick D (2006) Factors driving small rodent's assemblages from field boundaries in agricultural landscapes of Western France. Landscape Ecol 21:449–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold J, Humer A, Heltai M, Murariu D, Spassov N, Hackländer K (2012) Current status and distribution of golden jackals Canis aureus in Europe. Mammal Rev 42:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banea OC, Krofel M, Červinka J, Gargarea P, Szabó L (2012) New records, first estimates of densities and questions of applied ecology for jackals in Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve and hunting terrains from Romania. Acta Zool Bulg 64:353–366Google Scholar
  4. Červinka J, Šálek M, Pavluvčík P, Kreisinger J (2011) The fine-scale utilization of forest edges by mammalian mesopredators related to patch size and conservation issues in Central European farmland. Biodivers Conserv 20:3459–3475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Červinka J, Šálek M, Padyšáková E, Šmilauer P (2013) The effects of local and landscape-scale habitat characteristics and prey availability on corridor use by carnivores: a comparison of two contrasting farmlands. J Nat Conserv 21:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ćirović D, Milenković M, Paunović M, Penezić A (2008) Present distribution and factors of range spread of golden jackal (Canis aureus L. 1758) in Serbia. In: Hunting Association of Serbia (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on large carnivores, Žagubica, pp. 93–102 (In Serbian with English summary)Google Scholar
  7. ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  8. Giannatos G (2004) Conservation action plan for the golden jackal Canis aureus L. in Greece. WWF Greece, AthensGoogle Scholar
  9. Giannatos G, Marinos Y, Maragou P, Catsasorakis G (2005) The golden jackal (Canis aureaus L.) in Greece. Belg J Zool 135:145–149Google Scholar
  10. Harrington FH, Mech LD (1982) An analysis of howling response parameters useful for wolf pack censusing. J Wildl Manage 46:686–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huck M, Jedrzejewski W, Borowik T, Jedrzejewska B, Nowak S, Myslajek RW (2011) Analyses of least cost paths for determining effects of habitat types on landscape permeability: wolves in Poland. Acta Theriol 56:91–101PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jhala YV, Moehlman PD (2004) Golden jackal Canis aureus. In: Sillero-Zubiri C, Hoffmann M, Macdonald D (eds) Canids: Foxes, Wolves. Jackals and Dogs Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group Gland, Switzerland, pp 156–161Google Scholar
  13. Krofel M (2008) Survey of golden jackals (Canis aureus L.) in Northern Dalmatia, Croatia: preliminary results. Natura Croatica 17:259–264Google Scholar
  14. Kryštufek B, Murariu D, Kurtonur C (1997) Present distribution of the golden jackal Canis aureus in the Balkans and adjacent regions. Mammal Rev 27:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Griffiths P, Rusu M (2009) Land-use change in Southern Romania after the collapse of socialism. Reg Environ Change 9:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lanszki J, Giannatos G, Heltai M, Legakis A (2009) Diet composition of golden jackals during cub-rearing season in Mediterranean marshland, in Greece. Mamm Biol 74:72–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Markov G, Lanszki J (2012) Diet composition of the golden jackal Canis aureus in an agricultural environment. Folia Zool 61:44–48Google Scholar
  18. Müller D, Kuemmerle T, Rusu M, Griffith P (2009) Lost in transition: determinants of cropland abandonment in postsocialist Romania. J Land Use Sci 4:109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Python Software Foundation (2012) Python Language Reference, version 2.6. http://www.python.org. Accessed Aug 2012
  20. QGIS (2012) Quantum GIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org
  21. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0Google Scholar
  22. Sillero-Zubiri C, Reynolds J, Novaro A (2004) Management and control of canids near people. In: Macdonald DW, Sillero-Zubiri C (eds) Biology and conservation of wild canids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 17–40Google Scholar
  23. Simeneh G (2010) Habitat use and diet of golden jackal (Canis aureus) and human-carnivore conflict in Guassa community conservation area, Menz. MSc.Thesis, Addis Ababa University. Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  24. StatSoft Inc (2010) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 9.1. www.statsoft.com
  25. Stoyanov S (2012) Golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Bulgaria. Current status, distribution, demography and diet. International symposium on hunting, “Мodern aspects of sustainable management of game population” Zemun-Belgrade, Serbia, 22–24 June, 2012. pp 48–56Google Scholar
  26. Szabó L, Heltai M, Lanszki J, Szűcs E (2007) An indigenous predator, the golden jackal (Canis aureus L. 1758) spreading like an invasive species in Hungary. Bulletin USAMV-CN, 63–64Google Scholar
  27. Šálek M, Kreisinger J, Sedláček F, Albrecht T (2009) Corridor vs. hayfield matrix use by mammalian predators in an agricultural landscape. Agr Ecosyst Environ 134:8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Šálek M, Kreisinger J, Sedláček F, Albrecht T (2010) Do foraging opportunities determine preferences of mammalian predators for habitat edges in an agricultural landscape? Landscape Urban Plan 98:86–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (1998) CANOCO release 4. Reference manual and user's guide to Canoco for Windows: software for canonical community ordination. Microcomputer Power, IthacaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Šálek
    • 1
  • Jaroslav Červinka
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ovidiu C. Banea
    • 4
  • Miha Krofel
    • 5
  • Duško Ćirović
    • 6
  • Ivana Selanec
    • 7
  • Aleksandra Penezić
    • 6
  • Stanislav Grill
    • 8
  • Jan Riegert
    • 9
  1. 1.Institute of Vertebrate BiologyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Agriculture, Applied Ecology LaboratoryUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic
  3. 3.Administration of Třeboňsko PLANature Conservation Agency of the Czech RepublicTřeboňCzech Republic
  4. 4.Ecology Department of Crispus NGO SibiuSibiuRomania
  5. 5.Biotechnical FacultyUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  6. 6.University of BelgradeFaculty of BiologyBelgradeSerbia
  7. 7.Association BIOMZagrebCroatia
  8. 8.Department of Ecosystem Biology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic
  9. 9.Department of Zoology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations