Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimating population size and density of a low-density population of black bears in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) is home to a low-density black bear (Ursus americanus) population that exists at >2,400 m with a very limited growing season. A previous study (1984–1991) found bear densities among the lowest reported (1.37–1.52 bears/100 km2). Because of concerns of viability of this small population, we assessed population size and density of black bears from 2003 to 2006 to determine the current status of RMNP’s bear population. We used three approaches to estimate population size and density: (1) minimum number known, (2) occupancy modeling, and (3) catch per unit effort (CPUE). We used information from capture and remote-triggered cameras, as well as visitor information, to derive a minimum known population estimate of 20–24 individuals and a median density estimate of 1.35 bears/100 km2. Bear occupancy was estimated at 0.46 (SE = 0.11), with occupancy positively influenced by lodgepole pine stands, non-vegetated areas, and patch density but negatively influenced by mixed conifer stands. We combined the occupancy estimate with mean home-range size and overlap for bears in RMNP to derive a density estimate of 1.44 bears/100 km2. We also related CPUE to density estimates for eight low-density black bear populations to estimate density in RMNP; this estimate (1.03 bears/100 km2) was comparable to the occupancy estimate and suggests that this approach may be useful for future population monitoring. The use of corroborative techniques for assessing population size of a low-density black bear population was effective and should be considered for similar low-density wildlife populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti A (1996) An introduction to categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J Wildl Manage 74:1175–1178

    Google Scholar 

  • Augeri DM, Reading RP, Fisher M, Chivers DJ, Royle JA (2006) Good estimates of density: a response to Garshelis and McLellan. Int Bear News 15:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin RA (2008) Population demographics, habitat utilization, critical habitats, and condition of black bears in Rocky Mountain National Park. Ph.D. dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces

  • Baldwin RA, Bender LC (2008a) Den-site characteristics of black bears in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. J Wildl Manage 72:1717–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin RA, Bender LC (2008b) Distribution, occupancy, and habitat correlates of American martens (Martes americana) in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. J Mammal 89:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin RA, Bender LC (2009a) Foods and nutritional components of diets of black bear in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Can J Zool 87:1000–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin RA, Bender LC (2009b) Survival and productivity of a low-density black bear population in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Hum–Wildl Confl 3:271–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin RA, Bender LC (2010) Denning chronology of black bears in eastern Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. West N Am Nat 70:48–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck TDI (1991) Black bears of west-central Colorado. Technical publication number 39, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Ft. Collins

  • Beck TDI (1997) Development of black bear inventory techniques. Federal Aid Progress Report W-153-R-10, WP5A, J2, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins

  • Bender LC, Roloff GJ, Haufler JB (1996) Evaluating confidence intervals for habitat suitability models. Wildl Soc Bull 24:347–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman JL, Chamberlain MJ, Leopold BD, Jacobson HA (1996) An evaluation of two censusing techniques to estimate black bear population size on White River National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 50:614–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (2004) Challenges in estimating size and conservation of black bear in west-central Florida. Master’s thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JD, Smith KG (1994) A demographic comparison of two black bear populations in the interior highlands of Arkansas. Wildl Soc Bull 22:593–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello CM, Jones DE, Green-Hammond KA, Inman RM, Inman KH, Thompson BC, Deitner RA, Quigley HB (2001) A study of black bear ecology in New Mexico with models for population dynamics and habitat suitability. Final report, Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Project W-131-R. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SC, Ballard WB (2004) Effects of wildfire on black bear demographics in central Arizona. Wildl Soc Bull 32:928–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkie PC, Rempel RS, Carr AP (1999) Patch analyst user’s manual. Technical manual TM-002, Northwest Science and Technology. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Thunder Bay

    Google Scholar 

  • Elowe KD (1987) Factors affecting black bear reproductive success and cub survival in Massachusetts. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

  • Frost HC (1990) Population and reproductive characteristics of black bears on an isolated mountain in southeastern Utah. Master’s thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo

  • Grogan RG, Lindzey FG (1999) Estimating population size of a low-density black bear population using capture–resight. Ursus 11:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu W, Swihart RK (2004) Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models. Biol Conserv 116:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter WH, III (2001) Biology of the black bear in the northern coastal plain of South Carolina. Master’s thesis, Clemson University, Clemson

  • Jennelle CS, Runge MC, MacKenzie DI (2002) The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals: a comment on misleading conclusions. Anim Conserv 5:119–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KU, Nichols JD (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasworm WF, Manley T (1988) Grizzly bear and black bear ecology in the Cabinet Mountains of Northwest Montana. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, Helena

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindzey FG, Meslow EC (1977) Population characteristics of black bears on an island in Washington. J Wildl Manage 41:408–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linke J, Franklin SE, Huettmann F, Stenhouse GB (2005) Seismic cutlines, changing landscape metrics and grizzly bear landscape use in Alberta. Landsc Ecol 20:811–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI (2006) Modeling the probability of resource use: the effect of, and dealing with, detecting a species imperfectly. J Wildl Manage 70:367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Bailey LL (2004) Assessing the fit of site occupancy models. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 9:300–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD (2004) Occupancy as a surrogate for abundance estimation. Anim Biodivers Conserv 27:461–467

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Bailey LL, Hines JE (2006) Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Martorello DA, Eason TH, Pelton MR (2001) A sighting technique using cameras to estimate population size of black bears. Wildl Soc Bull 29:560–567

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen HE (1990) Cryptic behavior of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Int Conference Bear Res Manage 8:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen HE (1993) Ecology of high mountain black bear population in relation to land use at Rocky Mountain NP. Park Sci 13:25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller SD, Becker EF, Ballard WB (1987) Black and brown bear density estimates using modified capture–recapture techniques in Alaska. Int Conference Bear Res Manage 7:23–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SD, White GC, Sellers RA, Reynolds HV, Schoen JW, Titus K, Barnes VG Jr, Smith TB, Nelson RR, Ballard WB, Schwartz CC (1997) Brown and black bear density estimation in Alaska using radiotelemetry and replicated mark–resight techniques. Wildl Monogr 133:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke NJD (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78:691–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service (1988) Management policies. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD, Williams BK (2006) Monitoring for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:668–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noyce KV, Garshelis DL, Coy PL (2001) Differential vulnerability of black bears to trap and camera sampling and resulting biases in mark–recapture estimates. Ursus 12:211–226

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell AF Jr, Talancy NW, Bailey LL, Sauer JR, Cook R, Gilbert AT (2006) Estimating site occupancy and detection probability parameters for meso- and large mammals in a coastal ecosystem. J Wildl Manage 70:1625–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oli MK, Jacobson HA, Leopold BD (2002) Pattern of space use by female black bears in the White River National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas, USA. J Nat Conserv 10:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando MA (2003) The ecology and behavior of an isolated black bear population in west central Florida. Master’s thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington

  • Pagano AM, Arnold TW (2009) Detection probabilities for ground-based breeding waterfowl surveys. J Wildl Manage 73:392–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelton MR (2003) Black bear (Ursus americanus). In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 547–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain-Bondi KA, Wielgus RB, Waits L, Kasworm WF, Austin M, Wakkinen W (2004) Density and population size estimates for North Cascade grizzly bears using DNA hair-sampling techniques. Biol Conserv 117:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1982) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. Charles Griffin and Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research was funded by Rocky Mountain National Park and the New Mexico State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. Thanks are extended to K. Boykin, A. Ernst, and S. Schrader for assistance with GIS questions. S. Graham, B. Hoenes, M. Levine, L. Polson, M. Polson, and many other RMNP volunteers provided valuable field assistance.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Roger A. Baldwin

    Present address: Kearney Agricultural Research & Extension Center, University of California, 9240 South Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA, 93648, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88003, USA

    Roger A. Baldwin

  2. Extension Animal Sciences and Natural Resources, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88003, USA

    Louis C. Bender

Authors
  1. Roger A. Baldwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Louis C. Bender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger A. Baldwin.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldwin, R.A., Bender, L.C. Estimating population size and density of a low-density population of black bears in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Eur J Wildl Res 58, 557–566 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0605-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0605-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation