Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Occurrence of eggs and oocysts of intestinal parasites of pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) in droppings collected in differently managed protected areas of Tuscany (Italy)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The releasing of farm-reared pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) is a very common practice in order to sustain high hunting pressures. However farm-reared birds may be carriers of parasites and diseases for the natural populations. We compared the parasite egg and oocyst prevalence and abundance of excretions found in faecal droppings collected in 13 different protected areas of Tuscany: seven areas where farm-reared pheasants are released every year to increase the reproduction and dispersion of the wild population (restocking areas) and in six areas where the production of pheasants is guaranteed only by the wild population (wild areas). Eimeria spp. oocysts were found in 33 of 129 (25.6%) samples collected in wild areas and in 59 of 119 (51.3%) of samples collected in restocking areas. Nematode eggs were found in 21 of 129 (16.3%) samples collected in wild areas and in 59 of 119 (49.6%) of samples collected in restocking areas. Significant differences were found for Capillaria spp. (31.9% of restocking areas vs. 9.3% of wild areas) and Syngamus spp. (10.1% of restocking areas vs. 3.1% of wild areas) but not for Heterakis or Ascaridia spp. (7.6% of restocking areas vs. 3.9% of wild areas). Parasitic excretion abundance was higher in the droppings collected in restocking areas compared to those collected in wild areas, but differences were significant only for Eimeria and Capillaria spp. In order to reduce the risk of spreading parasites and diseases, we suggest to interpose a strip (larger than the home range of the pheasants) where hunting is not forbidden between the restocking areas and the wild areas, and pheasant releases should not be allowed at least within a “pheasant home range distance” from the wild areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arroyo B, Beja P (2002) Impact of hunting management practices on biodiversity. Final report of the Workpackage 2 of the project Reconciling Gamebird Hunting and Biodiversity (REGHAB). Institute of Terrestrial Ecology and Instituto de Investigacion en Resursos Cinegeticos, pp. 65

  • Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol 83(4):575–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Draycott RAH, Sage RB (2005) Parasite control and breeding success in pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). In: Pohlmeyer K (ed) Extended abstracts of the XXVIIth Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists, Hannover. DSV, Hamburg, pp 76–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Draycott RAH, Parish DMB, Woodburn MIA, Carroll JP (2000) Spring survey of the parasite Heterakis gallinarum in wild-living pheasants in Britain. Vet Rec 147:245–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Draycott RAH, Hoodless AN, Sage RB (2008) Effects of pheasant management on vegetation and birds in lowland woodlands. J Appl Ecol 45:334–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldova M, Paluš V, Letková V, Kočisová A, Čurlik J, Mojžišova (2006) Parasitoses of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) in confined system. Vet Arh 76:S83-–S89

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani P, Perrucci S, Bennati L, Bagliacca M, Santilli F, Mazzoni della Stella R, Rossi G (2001) Monitoraggio parassitologico in fagiani di Zone di Rispetto Venatorio e Zone di Ripopolamento e Cattura della Provincia di Siena (In italian with English summary: Parasitological control of wild pheasant in managed areas of Siena province). Annali della Facoltà di Medicina Veterinaria. Università di Pisa 53: 35–42

  • Millán J, Gortazar C, Tizzani P, Buenestado FJ (2002) Do helminths increase vulnerability of released pheasant to fox predation? J Helminthol 76(3):225–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millán J, Gortázar C, Villafuerte R (2004) A comparison of the helminth faunas of wild and farm-reared red-legged partridges. J Wildl Manage 68(3):701–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Permin A, Hansen JW (1998) The epidemiology, diagnosis and control of poultry parasites. FAO Handbook pp 155

  • Santilli F, Bagliacca M (2008) Factors influencing pheasant Phasianus colchicus harvesting in Tuscany (Italy). Wildl Biol 14:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2002) JMP statistical and graphic guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Seivwright LJ, Redpath S, Mougeot F, Watt L, Hudson PJ (2004) Faecal egg counts provide a reliable measure of Trichostrongylus tenuis intensities in free-living red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. J Helminthol 78:69–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokos CK, Birtsas PK, Tsachalidis EP (2008) The aims of galliforms release and choice of techniques. Wildl Biol 14:412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thienpont D, Rochette F, Vanparijs OFJ (1986) Diagnosing of helminthiasis through coprological examination, 2nd edn. Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins DM, Greenman JV, Hudson PJ (2001) Differential impact of shared nematode parasite on two gamebird host: implications for apparent competition. Parasitology 122:187–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villanúa D, Acevedo P, Höfle U, Rodríguez O, Gortazar C (2006a) Changes in parasite transmission stage excretion after pheasant release. J Helminthol 80(3):313–318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Villanúa D, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Gortazar C, Höfle U, Viñuela J (2006b) Avoiding bias in parasite excretion estimates: the effect of sampling time and type of faeces. Parasitology 133:251–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Villanúa D, Casas F, Viñuela J, Gortázar C, García de la Morena EL, Morales MB (2007a) First occurence of Eucoleus contortus in a little bustard Tetrax tetrax. A negative effect of red-legged partridge Alectoris rufa releases on steppe bird conservation? Ibis 149:405–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villanúa D, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Rodríguez O, Viñuela J, Gortazar C (2007b) How effective is pre-release nematode control in farm reared red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa)? J Helmithol 81(1):101–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Villanúa D, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Casas F, Alzaga V, Acevedo P, Viñuela J, Gortazar C (2008) Sanitary risks of red-legged partridge releases: introduction of parasites. Eur J Wildl Res 54:199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Schantz T, Wittzell H, Göransson G, Grahn M, Persson K (1996) MHC genotype and male ornamentation: genetic evidence for the Hamilton–Zuk model. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodburn MIA (1995) Do parasites alter pheasant breeding success? Game Conservancy Annu Rev 26:96–97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Santilli.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santilli, F., Bagliacca, M. Occurrence of eggs and oocysts of intestinal parasites of pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) in droppings collected in differently managed protected areas of Tuscany (Italy). Eur J Wildl Res 58, 369–372 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0552-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0552-8

Keywords

Navigation