Skip to main content

Effectiveness of odour repellents on red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a field test

Abstract

Chemical repellents are promoted as a method to reduce ungulate–vehicle collisions and ungulate browsing damages to agricultural and forestry resources. We tested the effectiveness of two odour repellents (Mota FL and Wolf Urine) on the foraging behaviour and area avoidance of free-ranging roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus). The effects of the repellents were assessed by comparing deer visitation rates to sand arenas before and after application of repellents and visitation rates to control arenas. Neither of the tested products reduced deer visitation rates. Rapid habituation to olfactory stimuli and lack of sensitivity to predator odours may explain the ineffectiveness of the repellents to alter the behaviour of the deer. The results indicate that the tested products have no effects on roe deer and red deer behaviour and suggest that the effectiveness of the chemical area repellents as a measure to reduce deer–vehicle collision risk and browsing damages is questionable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Andreassen HP, Gundersen H, Storaas T (2005) The effect of scent marking, forest-clearing, and supplemental feeding on moose-train collisions. J Wildl Manage 69:1125–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Apfelbach R, Blanchard CD, Blanchard RJ, Hayes RA, McGregor IS (2005) The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1123–1144

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atwood TC, Gese EM, Kunkel KE (2008) Comparative patterns of predation by cougars and recolonizing wolves in Montana's Madison Range. J Wildl Manage 71:1098–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger J, Swensson JE, Persson I-L (2001) Recolonizing carnivores and naïve prey: conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions. Science 291:1036–1039

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D'Angelo GJ, D'Angelo JG, Gallagher GR, Osborn DA, Miller KV, Warren RJ (2006) Evaluation of wildlife warning reflectors for altering white-tailed deer behavior along roadways. Wildl Soc Bull 34:1175–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Groot Bruinderink GWTA, Hazebroek E (1996) Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conservat Biol 10:1059–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huijser MP, Duffield JW, Clevenger AP, Ament RJ, McGowen PT (2009) Cost–benefit analyses of mitigation measures aimed at reducing collisions with large ungulates in the United States and Canada: a decision support tool. Ecol Soc 14:15 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art15/. Accessed 14 Jan 2010

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iuell B, Begger GJ, Cuoerus R et al (eds) (2003) Wildlife and traffic. A European handbook for identifying conflicts and designing solutions. KNNV Publishers, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jaeger JAG, Fahrig L (2004) Effects of road fencing on population persistence. Conservat Biol 18:1651–1657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jayakody S, Sibbald AM, Gordon IJ, Lambin X (2008) Red deer Cervus elephus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance. Wildl Biol 141:81–91

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jensen B (1993) Nordens pattedyr. [Nordic mammals] G.E.C. GAD Forlag, Copenhagen

  12. Kimball BA, Taylor J, Perry KR, Capelli C (2009) Deer responses to repellent stimuli. J Chem Ecol 35:1461–1470

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Knapp KK, Yi X, Oakasa T, Thimm W, Hudson E, Rathmann C (2004) Deer-vehicle crash countermeasure toolbox: a decision and choice resource. Midwest Regional University Transportation Center

  14. Lutz W (1994) Ergebnisse der Anwendung eines sogenannten Duftzaunes zur Vermeidung von Wildverlusten durch Strassenverkehr nach Gehege- und Freilandorientierungen. Z Jagdw 40:91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Putman RJ, Langbein J, Staines BW (2004) Deer and road traffic accidents: a review of mitigation measures: costs and cost-effectiveness. Report for the Deer Commission for Scotland

  16. Ratikainen II, Panzacchi M, Mysterud A, Odden J, Linnell J, Andersen R (2007) Use of winter habitat by roe deer at a northern latitude where Eurasian lynx are present. J Zool Lond 273:192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarno RJ, Grigione MM, Arvidson LD (2008) Lack of response of an open-habitat ungulate to the presence of predator urine. Rev Chil Hist Nat 81:179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thiel PK, Coutant AE, Olesen CR (2004) Seasonal changes and activity-dependent variation in heart rate of roe deer. J Mammal 85:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservat Biol 14:18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ujvári ML, Baagøe HJ, Madsen AB (1998) Effectiveness of wildlife warning reflectors in reducing deer-vehicle collisions: a behavioral study. J Wildl Manage 62:1094–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ujvári ML, Baagøe HJ, Madsen AB (2004) Effectiveness of acoustic road markings in reducing deer-vehicle collisions: a behavioural study. Wildl Biol 10:155–159

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner KK, Nolte DL (2001) Comparison of active ingredients and delivery systems in deer repellents. Wildl Soc Bull 29:322–330

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J Andersen, U Lorentzen and O Daugaard, Forest and Nature Agency, Blåvandshuk, for access to the study area. JKW was financially supported by the Danish Animal Welfare Society, Kjebi Foundation and Svales Foundation. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morten Elmeros.

Additional information

Communicated by H. Kierdorf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elmeros, M., Winbladh, J.K., Andersen, P.N. et al. Effectiveness of odour repellents on red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a field test. Eur J Wildl Res 57, 1223–1226 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0517-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cervidae
  • Chemical deterrents
  • Habituation
  • Browsing damage
  • Deer–vehicle collision